Capstone Change Project Implementation Plan

profileSashells1986
NRS-465Rubric-Benchmark-CapstoneChangeProjectImplementationPlan.pdf

Benchmark - Capstone Change Project Implementation Plan - Rubric

Summary of Problem 2.25 points

Criteria Description

Summarize the problem or issue being addressed by the student's proposed change project.

5. Target 2.25 points

A summary of the problem or issue being addressed by the student's proposed change project is thorough and

accurate.

4. Acceptable 2 points

A summary of the problem or issue being addressed by the student's proposed change project is mostly

detailed.

3. Approaching 1.78 points

A summary of the problem or issue being addressed by the student's proposed change project is present but

lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 1.69 points

A summary of the problem or issue being addressed by the student's proposed change project is incomplete

or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A summary of the problem or issue being addressed by the student's proposed change project is missing.

Collapse All

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Solution (B) 9 points

Criteria Description

Propose a solution to the identified problem, including sociocultural and linguistic considerations and affect

nursing practice. (C 5.1a) (C5.1)

5. Target 9 points

A proposed solution to the identified problem, including sociocultural and linguistic considerations and affect

nursing practice, is thorough and accurate.

4. Acceptable 8.01 points

A proposed solution to the identified problem, including sociocultural and linguistic considerations and affect

nursing practice, is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching 7.11 points

A proposed solution to the identified problem, including sociocultural and linguistic considerations and affect

nursing practice, is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 6.75 points

A proposed solution to the identified problem, including sociocultural and linguistic considerations and affect

nursing practice, is incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A proposed solution to the identified problem, including sociocultural and linguistic considerations and affect

nursing practice, is missing.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Implementation of Intervention 6.75 points

Criteria Description

Describe how nursing practice intervention will be implemented in capstone change project, including impact it

will have on nursing practice.

5. Target 6.75 points

A description of how nursing practice intervention will be implemented in capstone change project, including

impact it will have on nursing practice, is thorough and accurate.

4. Acceptable 6.01 points

A description of how nursing practice intervention will be implemented in capstone change project, including

impact it will have on nursing practice, is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching 5.33 points

A description of how nursing practice intervention will be implemented in capstone change project, including

impact it will have on nursing practice, is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 5.06 points

A description of how nursing practice intervention will be implemented in capstone change project, including

impact it will have on nursing practice, is incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A description of how nursing practice intervention will be implemented in capstone change project, including

impact it will have on nursing practice, is missing.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Objectives 4.5 points

Criteria Description

List three to five objectives for the student's proposed intervention.

5. Target 4.5 points

A list of three to five objectives for the student's proposed intervention is thorough and accurate.

4. Acceptable 4.01 points

A list of three to five objectives for the student's proposed intervention is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching 3.56 points

A list of three to five objectives for the student's proposed intervention is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 3.38 points

A list of three to five objectives for the student's proposed intervention is incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A list of three to five objectives for the student's proposed intervention is missing.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Measurable Outcomes (B) 4.5 points

Criteria Description

List three to five measurable outcomes for the student's proposed intervention. (C 5.1b) (C5.1)

5. Target 4.5 points

A list of three to five measurable outcomes for the student's proposed intervention is thorough and accurate.

4. Acceptable 4.01 points

A list of three to five measurable outcomes for the student's proposed intervention is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching 3.56 points

A list of three to five measurable outcomes for the student's proposed intervention is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 3.38 points

A list of three to five measurable outcomes for the student's proposed intervention is incomplete or

inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A list of three to five measurable outcomes for the student's proposed intervention is missing.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Rationale 4.5 points

Criteria Description

Provide a rationale for how the proposed project, objectives, and outcomes demonstrate respect for autonomy

(self-determination) for individuals and diverse populations.

5. Target 4.5 points

A rationale for how the proposed project, objectives, and outcomes demonstrate respect for autonomy (self-

determination) for individuals and diverse populations is thorough and accurate.

4. Acceptable 4.01 points

A rationale for how the proposed project, objectives, and outcomes demonstrate respect for autonomy (self-

determination) for individuals and diverse populations is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching 3.56 points

A rationale for how the proposed project, objectives, and outcomes demonstrate respect for autonomy (self-

determination) for individuals and diverse populations is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 3.38 points

A rationale for how the proposed project, objectives, and outcomes demonstrate respect for autonomy (self-

determination) for individuals and diverse populations is incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A rationale for how the proposed project, objectives, and outcomes demonstrate respect for autonomy (self-

determination) for individuals and diverse populations is missing.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose 3.15 points

Criteria Description

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

5. Target 3.15 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is

demonstrated.

4. Acceptable 2.8 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific

audience.

3. Approaching 2.49 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended

audience.

2. Insufficient 2.36 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is

limited awareness of the appropriate audience

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion 3.15 points

Criteria Description

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.

5. Target 3.15 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization

or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

4. Acceptable 2.8 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion

aligns to the development of the purpose.

3. Approaching 2.49 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and

unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

2. Insufficient 2.36 points

Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas

are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing

or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Evidence 2.7 points

Criteria Description

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

5. Target 2.7 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.

4. Acceptable 2.4 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

3. Approaching 2.13 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other

perspectives is present.

2. Insufficient 2.03 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of

the writer.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Mechanics of Writing 2.7 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

5. Target 2.7 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure

is attempted.

4. Acceptable 2.4 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

3. Approaching 2.13 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

2. Insufficient 2.03 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence

structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence

structure errors are found throughout.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Format/Documentation 1.8 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations,

footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 1.8 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 1.6 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 1.42 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

2. Insufficient 1.35 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of

sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 45 points

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.