Assessment Description
NRS-465: Rubric: Evaluation of Student by Preceptor
|
Criteria |
% Value |
1: Unacceptable |
2: Below Expectations |
3: Meets Expectations |
|
% Scaling |
|
0% |
75% |
100% |
|
Judgement/Common Sense |
10% |
Student never responds to clinical situations logically nor demonstrates good judgement and does not consider the cost/benefits and ethical principles. |
Student inconsistently responds to clinical situations logically and demonstrates good judgement, and rarely considers the cost/benefits and ethical principles. |
Student consistently responds to clinical situations logically and demonstrates good judgement and does consider the cost/benefits and ethical principles. |
|
Community as a Client and Partner |
10% |
Student never considers the community as client throughout the course. |
Student inconsistently considers the community as client throughout the course. |
Student consistently considers community as client throughout the course. |
|
Attitude/Cooperation |
10% |
Student never maintains professional composure and never accepts instruction; is not well motivated and does not show enthusiasm. |
Student inconsistently maintains professional composure and rarely accepts instruction; is somewhat motivated and shows little enthusiasm. |
Student consistently maintains professional composure and routinely accepts instruction; is well-motivated and does show enthusiasm. |
|
Accountability/Dependability |
10% |
Student is never in good attendance, nor punctual, nor well prepared; and does not meet minimum clinical hour requirements. |
Student is inconsistent in attendance, punctuality and is rarely well prepared; and does not meet minimum clinical hour requirements.
|
Student is consistently in good attendance, punctual and well prepared; and does meet minimum clinical hour requirements. |
|
Communication Skills |
10% |
Student never communicates well with staff and patients. Oral and written communication is never free of errors.
|
Student inconsistently communicates with staff and patients. Oral and written is inconsistently free of errors. |
Student consistently communicates well with staff. Oral and written communication is consistently free of errors. |
|
Critical Thinking Skills |
10% |
Student never applies critical thinking skills in clinical practice. |
Student inconsistently applies critical thinking skills in clinical practice. |
Student consistently applies critical thinking skills in clinical practice. |
|
Professionalism/Collaboration |
10% |
Student never articulates the specific scope of the change project proposal and never collaborates with other health care partners. |
Student inconsistently articulates the specific scope of the change project proposal and inconsistently collaborates with other health care partners. |
Student consistently articulated the specific scope of the change project proposal and consistently collaborates with other health care partners. |
|
Leadership Role |
10% |
Student never demonstrates leadership skills in client care and professional relationships. |
Student inconsistently demonstrates leadership skills in client care and professional relationships. |
Student consistently demonstrates leadership skills in client care and professional relationships. |
|
Ethical Principles/Care |
10% |
Student never provides safe, quality, cost-effective care with ethically sound solutions across the life span. |
Student inconsistently provides safe, quality, cost-effective care with ethically sound solutions across the life span. |
Student consistently provides safe, quality, cost-effective care with ethically sound solutions across the life span. |
|
Evidence-based practice |
10% |
Student never considers evidence-based practice when determining needs, interventions, and outcomes. |
Student inconsistently considers evidence-based practice when determining needs, interventions, and outcomes.
|
Student consistently considers evidence-based practice when determining needs, interventions, and outcomes. |
© 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.