Nursing Report

stressedstudent

NRS-440Rubric-FutureofNursingReport.pdf

Home >Nursing homework help >Nursing Report

Future of Nursing Report - Rubric

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and Future

of Nursing Report 16.5 points

Criteria Description

A description of the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and

Medicine that led to the Future of Nursing report.

5. Target 16.5 points

A clear and accurate description of the work of the National Academies of Sciences,

Engineering, and Medicine that led to the Future of Nursing report is presented.

4. Acceptable 14.69 points

A detailed description of the work of the National Academies of Sciences,

Engineering, and Medicine that led to the Future of Nursing report is presented.

3. Approaching 13.04 points

A description of the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and

Medicine that led to the Future of Nursing report is presented.

2. Insufficient 12.38 points

A description of the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and

Medicine that led to the Future of Nursing report lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A description of the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and

Medicine that led to the Future of Nursing report is omitted or inaccurate.

Collapse All

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

Current Trends and Education 16.5 points

Criteria Description

An explanation of current trends in the nursing workforce and how nursing education

is adapting to meet the needs.

5. Target 16.5 points

A clear and accurate explanation of current trends in the nursing workforce, how

nursing education is adapting to meet the needs, and the role of the nurse in

leading change of the profession is discussed.

4. Acceptable 14.69 points

A detailed explanation of current trends in the nursing workforce, how nursing

education is adapting to meet the needs, and the role of the nurse in leading

change is discussed.

3. Approaching 13.04 points

An explanation of current trends in the nursing workforce, how nursing education is

adapting to meet the needs, and the role of the nurse in leading change is

discussed.

2. Insufficient 12.38 points

An explanation of current trends in the nursing workforce, how nursing education is

adapting to meet the needs, and the role of the nurse in leading change lacks detail

or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

An explanation of current trends in the nursing workforce, how nursing education is

adapting to meet the needs, and the role of the nurse in leading change is omitted

or inaccurate.

https://www.gce.com/

State-Based Action Coalitions and Their Help in Advancing Goals form

National Academy of Sciences re 16.5 points

Criteria Description

A discussion of the role of state-based action coalitions and how they help advance the

goals in the National Academy of Sciences report.

5. Target 16.5 points

A clear and accurate discussion of the role of state-based action coalitions and how

they help advance the goals in the National Academy of Sciences report is

presented.

4. Acceptable 14.69 points

A detailed discussion of the role of state-based action coalitions and how they help

advance the goals in the National Academy of Sciences report is presented.

3. Approaching 13.04 points

A discussion of the role of state-based action coalitions and how they help advance

the goals in the National Academy of Sciences report is presented.

2. Insufficient 12.38 points

A discussion of the role of state-based action coalitions and how these advance the

goals in the National Academy of Sciences report lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The role of state-based action coalitions is omitted or inaccurate.

https://www.gce.com/

State Action Coalition Initiatives Advancing Nursing Profession 33 points

Criteria Description

A discussion of two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they

advance the nursing profession.

5. Target 33 points

A clear and accurate discussion of two initiatives spearheaded by a state action

coalition and how they advance the nursing profession is present.

4. Acceptable 29.37 points

A detailed discussion of two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and

how they advance the nursing profession is present.

3. Approaching 26.07 points

A discussion of two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they

advance the nursing profession is present.

2. Insufficient 24.75 points

A discussion of initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they

advance the nursing profession lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A discussion of initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they

advance the nursing profession is omitted or inaccurate.

https://www.gce.com/

Barriers to Advancement 33 points

Criteria Description

A description of barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how

nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers.

5. Target 33 points

A clear and accurate description of barriers to advancement that currently exist in

the state and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is present.

4. Acceptable 29.37 points

A detailed description of barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state

and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is present.

3. Approaching 26.07 points

A description of barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how

nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is present.

2. Insufficient 24.75 points

A description of barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how

nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A description of barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how

nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is omitted or inaccurate.

https://www.gce.com/

Thesis, Position, or Purpose 11.55 points

Criteria Description

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

5. Target 11.55 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly

directed to a specific audience.

4. Acceptable 10.28 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the

appropriate audience is demonstrated.

3. Approaching 9.12 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally

weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

2. Insufficient 8.66 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little

awareness of the intended audience.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate

audience is evident.

https://www.gce.com/

Development, Structure, and Conclusion 11.55 points

Criteria Description

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves

from development.

5. Target 11.55 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression

of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the

development of the purpose.

4. Acceptable 10.28 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on

each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

3. Approaching 9.12 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are

inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic

and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

2. Insufficient 8.66 points

Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some

organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and

not supported by the overall development of the purpose.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections

between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

https://www.gce.com/

Evidence 9.9 points

Criteria Description

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers

other perspectives.

5. Target 9.9 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are

clearly considered.

4. Acceptable 8.81 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

3. Approaching 7.82 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or

integration of other perspectives is present.

2. Insufficient 7.43 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is

superficial or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies

entirely on the perspective of the writer.

https://www.gce.com/

Mechanics of Writing 9.9 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 9.9 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 8.81 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 7.82 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 7.43 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

https://www.gce.com/

Format/Documentation 6.6 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 6.6 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 5.87 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 5.21 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 4.95 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 165 points

https://www.gce.com/