Health Promotion - Topic 4

Benchmark - Community Teaching Project - Part 4 - Rubric

Representative's Role 10 points

Criteria Description

Description of representative's role within the nonprofit organization and the role of

the organization.

5. Target 10 points

A description of representative's role within the nonprofit organization and the role

of the organization is thorough.

4. Acceptable 8.9 points

N/A

3. Approaching 7.9 points

A description of representative's role within the nonprofit organization and the role

of the organization is present, but lacking detail.

2. Insufficient 7.5 points

N/A

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A description of representative's role within the nonprofit organization and the role

of the organization is missing or incomplete.

Collapse All

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Addressing the Issue 10 points

Criteria Description

Explanation of how the organization addresses the issues faced by the community.

5. Target 10 points

An explanation of how the organization addresses the issues faced by the

community is thorough.

4. Acceptable 8.9 points

An explanation of how the organization addresses the issues faced by the

community is detailed.

3. Approaching 7.9 points

An explanation of how the organization addresses the issues faced by the

community is present, but lacking detail.

2. Insufficient 7.5 points

An explanation of how the organization addresses the issues faced by the

community is present but inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

An explanation of how the organization addresses the issues faced by the

community is not present.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Feedback (B) 12.5 points

Criteria Description

Discussion of feedback received from representative after reviewing the teaching plan.

(C 3.2)

5. Target 12.5 points

A discussion of feedback received from representative after reviewing the teaching

plan is thorough.

4. Acceptable 11.13 points

A discussion of feedback received from representative after reviewing the teaching

plan is detailed.

3. Approaching 9.88 points

A discussion of feedback received from representative after reviewing the teaching

plan is present, but lacking detail.

2. Insufficient 9.38 points

A discussion of feedback received from representative after reviewing the teaching

plan is present but inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A discussion of feedback received from representative after reviewing the teaching

plan is not present.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Partnership Approach (B) 12.5 points

Criteria Description

Explanation of how you communicated with the interviewee in a manner that

facilitates a partnership approach to quality delivery (C 6.1).

5. Target 12.5 points

An explanation of how you communicated with the interviewee in a manner that

facilitates a partnership approach to quality delivery is thorough.

4. Acceptable 11.13 points

An explanation of how you communicated with the interviewee in a manner that

facilitates a partnership approach to quality delivery is detailed.

3. Approaching 9.88 points

An explanation of how you communicated with the interviewee in a manner that

facilitates a partnership approach to quality delivery is present, but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 9.38 points

An explanation of how you communicated with the interviewee in a manner that

facilitates a partnership approach to quality delivery is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

An explanation of how you communicated with the interviewee in a manner that

facilitates a partnership approach to quality delivery is missing.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Mechanics of Writing 3 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 3 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 2.67 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 2.37 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 2.25 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Format/Documentation 2 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 2 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 1.78 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 1.58 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 1.5 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 50 points

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.