Developmental Assessment and the School-Aged Child

renol81

NRS-420Rubric-DevelopmentalAssessmentandtheSchool-AgedChild.pdf

Home >Nursing homework help >Developmental Assessment and the School-Aged Child

Developmental Assessment and the School-Aged Child - Rubric

Assessment 18 points

Criteria Description

Summary of the relevant data obtained during assessment about the patient's health

status, including physical, psychological, sociocultural, spiritual, and economic factors

that are affecting the patient.

5. Target 18 points

Summary of the relevant data obtained during assessment about the patient's

health status, including physical, psychological, sociocultural, spiritual, and

economic factors that are affecting the patient is thorough.

4. Acceptable 16.02 points

Summary of the relevant data obtained during assessment about the patient's

health status, including physical, psychological, sociocultural, spiritual, and

economic factors that are affecting the patient, is detailed.

3. Approaching 14.22 points

Summary of the relevant data obtained during assessment about the patient's

health status, including physical, psychological, sociocultural, spiritual, and

economic factors that are affecting the patient is present.

2. Insufficient 13.5 points

Summary of the relevant data obtained during assessment about the patient's

health status, including physical, psychological, sociocultural, spiritual, and

economic factors that are affecting the patient is lacking detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Summary of the relevant data obtained during assessment about the patient's

health status, including physical, psychological, sociocultural, spiritual, and

economic factors that are affecting the patient is omitted.

Collapse All

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

Diagnosis: Part 1 9 points

Criteria Description

Determination of two components of the Developmental Assets that need to be

addressed for this patient.

5. Target 9 points

Determination of two components of the Developmental Assets that need to be

addressed for this patient is thorough.

4. Acceptable 8.01 points

Determination of two components of the Developmental Assets that need to be

addressed for this patient is detailed.

3. Approaching 7.11 points

Determination of two components of the Developmental Assets that need to be

addressed for this patient is present.

2. Insufficient 6.75 points

Determination of two components of the Developmental Assets that need to be

addressed for this patient is lacking detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Determination of two components of the Developmental Assets that need to be

addressed for this patient is omitted.

https://www.gce.com/

Diagnosis: Part 2 9 points

Criteria Description

Definition of two components selected and explanation of rationale for selecting the

two components.

5. Target 9 points

Definition of two components selected and explanation of rationale for selecting

the two components is thorough.

4. Acceptable 8.01 points

Definition of two components selected and explanation of rationale for selecting

the two components is detailed.

3. Approaching 7.11 points

Definition of two components selected and explanation of rationale for selecting

the two components is present.

2. Insufficient 6.75 points

Definition of two components selected and explanation of rationale for selecting

the two components is lacking detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Definition of two components selected and explanation of rationale for selecting

the two components is omitted.

https://www.gce.com/

Planning: Part 1 8 points

Criteria Description

Creation of plan of care for patient, taking into account their health problems and

needs.

5. Target 8 points

Creation of plan of care for patient, taking into account their health problems and

needs is thorough.

4. Acceptable 7.12 points

Creation of plan of care for patient, taking into account their health problems and

needs, is detailed.

3. Approaching 6.32 points

Creation of plan of care for patient taking into account their health problems and

needs is present.

2. Insufficient 6 points

Creation of plan of care for patient, taking into account their health problems and

needs is lacking detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Creation of plan of care for patient, taking into account their health problems and

needs is omitted.

https://www.gce.com/

Planning: Part 2 8 points

Criteria Description

Description of how each of the two components of the Developmental Assets

identified above would be addressed, including specific examples in recommendations

and discussion.

5. Target 8 points

Description of how each of the two components of the Developmental Assets

identified above would be addressed, including specific examples in

recommendations and discussion is thorough.

4. Acceptable 7.12 points

Description of how each of the two components of the Developmental Assets

identified above would be addressed, including specific examples in

recommendations and discussion, is detailed.

3. Approaching 6.32 points

Description of how each of the two components of the Developmental Assets

identified above would be addressed, including specific examples in

recommendations and discussion is present.

2. Insufficient 6 points

Description of how each of the two components of the Developmental Assets

identified above would be addressed, including specific examples in

recommendations and discussion is lacking detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Description of how each of the two components of the Developmental Assets

identified above would be addressed, including specific examples in

recommendations and discussion is omitted.

https://www.gce.com/

Planning: Part 3 8 points

Criteria Description

Provision of at least one community resource for each of the selected Developmental

Assets components.

5. Target 8 points

Provision of at least one community resource for each of the selected

Developmental Assets components is thorough.

4. Acceptable 7.12 points

Provision of at least one community resource for each of the selected

Developmental Assets components is detailed.

3. Approaching 6.32 points

Provision of at least one community resource for each of the selected

Developmental Assets components is present.

2. Insufficient 6 points

Provision of at least one community resource for each of the selected

Developmental Assets components is lacking detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Provision of at least one community resource for each of the selected

Developmental Assets components is omitted.

https://www.gce.com/

Planning: Part 4 8 points

Criteria Description

Discussion of how cultural or religious beliefs may impact the plan of care.

5. Target 8 points

Discussion of how cultural or religious beliefs may impact the plan of care is

thorough.

4. Acceptable 7.12 points

Discussion of how cultural or religious beliefs may impact the plan of care is

detailed.

3. Approaching 6.32 points

Discussion of how cultural or religious beliefs may impact the plan of care is

present.

2. Insufficient 6 points

Discussion of how cultural or religious beliefs may impact the plan of care is lacking

detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Discussion of how cultural or religious beliefs may impact the plan of care is

omitted.

https://www.gce.com/

Implementation 11 points

Criteria Description

Discussion of how the four metaparadigm concepts (person, environment, health, and

nursing) support the implementation of plan of care

5. Target 11 points

Discussion of how the four metaparadigm concepts (person, environment, health,

and nursing) support the implementation of plan of care is thorough.

4. Acceptable 9.79 points

Discussion of how the four metaparadigm concepts (person, environment, health,

and nursing) support the implementation of plan of care is detailed.

3. Approaching 8.69 points

Discussion of how the four metaparadigm concepts (person, environment, health,

and nursing) support the implementation of plan of care is present.

2. Insufficient 8.25 points

Discussion of how the four metaparadigm concepts (person, environment, health,

and nursing) support the implementation of plan of care is lacking detail or is

incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Discussion of how the four metaparadigm concepts (person, environment, health,

and nursing) support the implementation of plan of care is omitted.

https://www.gce.com/

Evaluation 11 points

Criteria Description