Creating change

profilestressedstudent
NRS-415creatingchange.pdf

Benchmark - Creating Change Through Advocacy - Rubric

Problem 15 points

Criteria Description

Describe a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation

and the consequences if the issue continues.

5. Target 15 points

A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through

legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is thorough and includes

relevant supporting details.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through

legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is detailed.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through

legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through

legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A description of a health care problem that has the capacity for advocacy through

legislation and the consequences if the issue continues is not present.

Collapse All

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Research the Issue 22.5 points

Criteria Description

Identify a minimum of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of legislation

passed in other states within the last 5 years.

5. Target 22.5 points

Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of

legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is present and provides

substantive evidence of the identified issue.

4. Acceptable 19.13 points

Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of

legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is present and provides

evidence of the identified issue.

3. Approaching 16.88 points

Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of

legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is present but lacks

evidence of the identified issue or falls outside of the five-year limit.

2. Insufficient 14.63 points

Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of

legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Identification of at least of three research studies, reports, or similar pieces of

legislation passed in other states within the last 5 years is not present.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Idea for Addressing Solution (B) 22.5 points

Criteria Description

Explain an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best course for

advocacy. (C9.4)

5. Target 22.5 points

An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best

course for advocacy is thorough and provides detailed support from research.

4. Acceptable 19.13 points

An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best

course for advocacy is detailed and provides support from research.

3. Approaching 16.88 points

An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best

course for advocacy is present but lacks support from research.

2. Insufficient 14.63 points

An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best

course for advocacy is not present.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

An explanation of an idea for addressing the issue and why legislation is the best

course for advocacy is not present.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Stakeholder Support 15 points

Criteria Description

Discuss the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why.

5. Target 15 points

A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is

thorough.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is

detailed.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is

present.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is

incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A discussion of the stakeholders who would support the proposed idea and why is

not present.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Stakeholder Opposition 15 points

Criteria Description

Discuss the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why.

5. Target 15 points

A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is

thorough and includes relevant detail on how to debate these considerations.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is

detailed and includes some detail on how to debate these considerations.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is

present but lacks detail on how to debate these considerations.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is

incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A discussion of the stakeholders who would oppose the proposed idea and why is

not present.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Financial Incentives/Costs 15 points

Criteria Description

Explain the financial impact of the issue and the solution.

5. Target 15 points

An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is thorough and

includes relevant supporting detail from research.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is detailed and

includes some supporting detail from research.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is present but

lacks detail from research.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is incomplete or

incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

An explanation of the financial impact of the issue and the solution is incomplete.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Legislature: Information Needed and Process for Proposal 15 points

Criteria Description

Discuss how to advocate for the proposal using legislation.

5. Target 15 points

A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact

information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is

thorough and includes substantial detail from research.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact

information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is

detailed and includes some detail from research.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact

information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is

present but lacks substantial detail from research.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact

information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is

incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A discussion of how to advocate for the proposal using legislation, including contact

information for the legislator and the steps needed to present the proposal, is not

present.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Christian Principles and Nursing Advocacy 15 points

Criteria Description

Discuss how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative advocacy in

health care without bias.

5. Target 15 points

A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative

advocacy in health care without bias is thorough and includes substantial detail

regarding inclusiveness and positive health outcomes for all populations.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative

advocacy in health care without bias is detailed and includes some detail regarding

inclusiveness and positive health outcomes for all populations.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative

advocacy in health care without bias is present but lacks detail regarding

inclusiveness and positive health outcomes for all populations.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative

advocacy in health care without bias is incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A discussion of how principles of a Christian worldview lend support to legislative

advocacy in health care without bias is not present.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Mechanics of Writing 7.5 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 7.5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 6.38 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 5.63 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 4.88 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Format/Documentation 7.5 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 7.5 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 6.38 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 5.63 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 4.88 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 150 points

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.