Journal Entry

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Content

Name: PRAC_6635_Week11_Assignment_Rubric

• Grid View
• List View

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Assimilation and Synthesis: Content Reflection	Points: Points Range: 50 (50%) - 50 (50%) Reflection demonstrates a high level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or Discussions. Insightful and relevant connections are made through contextual explanations and examples. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 40 (40%) - 49 (49%) Reflection demonstrates moderate level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or Discussions. Connections are made through explanations and/or examples. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 31 (31%) - 39 (39%) Reflection demonstrates minimal critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or Discussions. Minimal connections made through explanations and/or examples. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 30 (30%) Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and resources, and/or assignments Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis: Personal Growth	Points: Points Range: 30 (30%) - 30 (30%) Expresses solid evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates substantial personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences, well developed insights, and significant depth in awareness and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 20 (20%) - 20 (20%) Expresses moderate evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences, insights, and challenges. There is mention of the future implications of student’s current experience. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 10 (10%) - 19 (19%) Expresses minimal evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through limited or simplistic inferences made, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. Minimal thought of future implications of student’s current experience. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 9 (9%) Expresses inadequate evidence of reflection on own work. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrate an impersonal experience. Lacks personal insights, challenges, inferences, and/or future implications are overlooked. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting	Points: Points Range: 15 (15%) - 15 (15%) Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 11 (11%) - 14 (14%) Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 6 (6%) - 10 (10%) Average writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 5 (5%) Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work. Feedback:
APA	Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) No APA errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains one to two (1–2) APA errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 2 (2%) - 3 (3%) Contains three to five (3–5) APA errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 1 (1%) Contains more than five (> 5) APA errors Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Assimilation and Synthesis: Content Reflection--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 50 (50%) - 50 (50%) Reflection demonstrates a high level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or Discussions. Insightful and relevant connections are made through contextual explanations and examples. Good 40 (40%) - 49 (49%) Reflection demonstrates moderate level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or Discussions. Connections are made through explanations and/or examples. Fair 31 (31%) - 39 (39%) Reflection demonstrates minimal critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or Discussions. Minimal connections made through explanations and/or examples. Poor 0 (0%) - 30 (30%) Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and resources, and/or assignments Feedback:

Assimilation and Synthesis: Personal Growth--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 30 (30%) - 30 (30%) Expresses solid evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates substantial personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences, well developed insights, and significant depth in awareness and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications. Good 20 (20%) - 20 (20%) Expresses moderate evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences, insights, and challenges. There is mention of the future implications of student’s current experience. Fair 10 (10%) - 19 (19%) Expresses minimal evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through limited or simplistic inferences made, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. Minimal thought of future implications of student’s current experience. Poor 0 (0%) - 9 (9%) Expresses inadequate evidence of reflection on own work. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrate an impersonal experience. Lacks personal insights, challenges, inferences, and/or future implications are overlooked. Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 15 (15%) - 15 (15%) Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors. Good 11 (11%) - 14 (14%) Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Fair 6 (6%) - 10 (10%) Average writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Poor 0 (0%) - 5 (5%) Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work. Feedback:

APA--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) No APA errors Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains one to two (1–2) APA errors Fair 2 (2%) - 3 (3%) Contains three to five (3–5) APA errors Poor 0 (0%) - 1 (1%) Contains more than five (> 5) APA errors Feedback:

Total Points: 100

Name: PRAC_6635_Week11_Assignment_Rubric