Study Plan

Catherine2

NRNP_6675_Week2_Assignment2_RubricDetails.html

Home >Nursing homework help > Study Plan

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Content

Name: NRNP_6675_Week2_Assignment2_Rubric

	Excellent 90%–100%	Good 80%–89%	Fair 70%–79%	Poor 0%–69%
Revise your study plan, summarizing your current strengths and opportunities for improvement.	Points: Points Range: 23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The response provides an accurate, clear, and complete summary of both current strengths and opportunities for improvement. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The response provides an accurate summary of both current strengths and opportunities for improvement. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The response provides a somewhat vague and/or inaccurate summary of both current strengths and opportunities for improvement. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 17 (17%) A summary of both the current strengths and opportunities for improvement are incomplete or missing. Feedback:
Develop 3-4 new SMART goals for this quarter and the tasks you need to complete to accomplish each goal. Include a timetable for accomplishing them and a description of how you will measure your progress.	Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response provides 3-4 new clear and appropriate SMART goals for the study plan, including tasks to complete to accomplish each goal. A clear timeline is provided for the study plan as well as a description of how progress toward goal completion will be measured. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response provides 3-4 new appropriate SMART goals and objectives for the practicum experience. Appropriate tasks, timeline, and description of how progress will be measured are provided. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response provides 3-4 somewhat vague or general goals for the study plan. Tasks, timeline, and description of how progress toward goals will be measured are vague or somewhat inappropriate. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response provides 3-4 unclear or inappropriate goals for the study plan, or goals are missing. Tasks, timeline, and a description for how progress will be measured are incomplete or missing. Feedback:
Describe resources you would use to accomplish your goals and tasks, such as ways to participate in a study group or review course, mnemonics and other mental strategies, and print or online resources you could use to study.	Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response provides a clear description of appropriate resources to support the study plan that are tailored to individual need. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response provides a description of appropriate resources to support the study plan that are somewhat tailored to individual need. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response provides a description of general resources that are not tailored to individual need. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response provides a description of inappropriate resources to support the study plan, or the description of resources is vague or missing. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.	Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time. Purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion were not provided. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting - English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation	Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for parenthetical/in-text citations and reference list.	Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 APA format errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 APA format errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains five or more APA format errors Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Revise your study plan, summarizing your current strengths and opportunities for improvement.--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The response provides an accurate, clear, and complete summary of both current strengths and opportunities for improvement. Good 80%–89% 20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The response provides an accurate summary of both current strengths and opportunities for improvement. Fair 70%–79% 18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The response provides a somewhat vague and/or inaccurate summary of both current strengths and opportunities for improvement. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) - 17 (17%) A summary of both the current strengths and opportunities for improvement are incomplete or missing. Feedback:

Develop 3-4 new SMART goals for this quarter and the tasks you need to complete to accomplish each goal. Include a timetable for accomplishing them and a description of how you will measure your progress.--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response provides 3-4 new clear and appropriate SMART goals for the study plan, including tasks to complete to accomplish each goal. A clear timeline is provided for the study plan as well as a description of how progress toward goal completion will be measured. Good 80%–89% 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response provides 3-4 new appropriate SMART goals and objectives for the practicum experience. Appropriate tasks, timeline, and description of how progress will be measured are provided. Fair 70%–79% 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response provides 3-4 somewhat vague or general goals for the study plan. Tasks, timeline, and description of how progress toward goals will be measured are vague or somewhat inappropriate. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response provides 3-4 unclear or inappropriate goals for the study plan, or goals are missing. Tasks, timeline, and a description for how progress will be measured are incomplete or missing. Feedback:

Describe resources you would use to accomplish your goals and tasks, such as ways to participate in a study group or review course, mnemonics and other mental strategies, and print or online resources you could use to study.--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response provides a clear description of appropriate resources to support the study plan that are tailored to individual need. Good 80%–89% 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response provides a description of appropriate resources to support the study plan that are somewhat tailored to individual need. Fair 70%–79% 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response provides a description of general resources that are not tailored to individual need. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response provides a description of inappropriate resources to support the study plan, or the description of resources is vague or missing. Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

-- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. Good 80%–89% 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive. Fair 70%–79% 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time. Purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion were not provided. Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting - English Writing Standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

-- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors Good 80%–89% 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Fair 70%–79% 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for parenthetical/in-text citations and reference list.--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Good 80%–89% 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 APA format errors Fair 70%–79% 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 APA format errors Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains five or more APA format errors Feedback:

Total Points: 100