Study Plan

Catherine2

NRNP_6665_Week3_Assignment2_RubricDetails.html

Home >Nursing homework help >Study Plan

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Content

Name: NRNP_6665_Week3_Assignment2_Rubric

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Based on your practice test question results and considering the national certification exam, summarize your strengths and opportunities for improvement.	Points: Points Range: 23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The response provides an accurate, clear, and complete summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The response provides an accurate summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The response provides a somewhat vague and/or inaccurate summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 17 (17%) A summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement are incomplete or missing. Feedback:
Create a study plan, including three or four SMART goals and the tasks you need to complete to accomplish each goal. Include a timetable for accomplishing them and a description of how you will measure your progress.	Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response provides three or four clear and appropriate SMART goals for the study plan, including tasks to complete to accomplish each goal. A clear timeline is provided for the study plan as well as a description of how progress toward goal completion will be measured. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response provides three or four appropriate SMART goals and objectives for the practicum experience. Appropriate tasks, timeline, and description of how progress will be measured are provided. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response provides three or four somewhat vague or general goals for the study plan. Tasks, timeline, and description of how progress toward goals will be measured are vague or somewhat inappropriate. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response provides three or four unclear or inappropriate goals for the study plan, or goals are missing. Tasks, timeline, and a description for how progress will be measured are incomplete or missing. Feedback:
Describe resources you would use to accomplish your goals and tasks, such as ways to participate in a study group or review course, mnemonics and other mental strategies, and print or online resources you could use to study.	Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response provides a clear description of appropriate resources to support the study plan that are tailored to individual need. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response provides a description of appropriate resources to support the study plan that are somewhat tailored to individual need. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response provides a description of general resources that are not tailored to individual need. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response provides a description of inappropriate resources to support the study plan, or the description of resources is vague or missing. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.	Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time. Purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion were not provided. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting - English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation	Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/narrative in-text citations, and reference list.	Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains one or two APA format errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (three or four) APA format errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) APA format errors Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Based on your practice test question results and considering the national certification exam, summarize your strengths and opportunities for improvement.--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 23 (23%) - 25 (25%) The response provides an accurate, clear, and complete summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. Good 20 (20%) - 22 (22%) The response provides an accurate summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. Fair 18 (18%) - 19 (19%) The response provides a somewhat vague and/or inaccurate summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. Poor 0 (0%) - 17 (17%) A summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement are incomplete or missing. Feedback:

Create a study plan, including three or four SMART goals and the tasks you need to complete to accomplish each goal. Include a timetable for accomplishing them and a description of how you will measure your progress.--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response provides three or four clear and appropriate SMART goals for the study plan, including tasks to complete to accomplish each goal. A clear timeline is provided for the study plan as well as a description of how progress toward goal completion will be measured. Good 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response provides three or four appropriate SMART goals and objectives for the practicum experience. Appropriate tasks, timeline, and description of how progress will be measured are provided. Fair 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response provides three or four somewhat vague or general goals for the study plan. Tasks, timeline, and description of how progress toward goals will be measured are vague or somewhat inappropriate. Poor 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response provides three or four unclear or inappropriate goals for the study plan, or goals are missing. Tasks, timeline, and a description for how progress will be measured are incomplete or missing. Feedback:

Describe resources you would use to accomplish your goals and tasks, such as ways to participate in a study group or review course, mnemonics and other mental strategies, and print or online resources you could use to study.--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) The response provides a clear description of appropriate resources to support the study plan that are tailored to individual need. Good 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) The response provides a description of appropriate resources to support the study plan that are somewhat tailored to individual need. Fair 21 (21%) - 23 (23%) The response provides a description of general resources that are not tailored to individual need. Poor 0 (0%) - 20 (20%) The response provides a description of inappropriate resources to support the study plan, or the description of resources is vague or missing. Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time. Purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion were not provided. Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting - English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/narrative in-text citations, and reference list.--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains one or two APA format errors Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (three or four) APA format errors Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) APA format errors Feedback:

Total Points: 100