Autism and Accommodations in Higher Education: Insights from the Autism Community
Background Information Summary
|
Client initials: |
Age: |
Gender: |
Primary Language |
|
Allergies: |
|||
|
Code status: |
Wt: |
Ht: |
BMI: |
|
Admit date: |
Hospital Day # |
|
|
|
Isolation Y N
Indication
|
Bleeding Precautions Y N
Indication |
Fall Risk Y N
Aspiration Risk Y N |
|
|
Admitting diagnosis/symptoms (chief complaint upon admission): |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Current medical diagnoses:
|
|||
|
Summary of hospitalization to date: (what happened from admission to time you took care of them)
|
|||
|
PMH/PSH:
|
|||
|
Social history (ethnicity, occupation, marital status, family support, living situation):
|
Relevant Medical ORDERS
|
VS freq: |
|
|
|
Diet: |
Blood sugars frequency: |
|
|
Activity order: |
|
|
|
Oxygen order: |
Respiratory Tx: |
|
|
Dressing changes: |
||
|
Other relevant orders:
|
Assessment and Analysis
|
Physical Assessment Findings |
Analysis of Findings (Explain significance related to current diagnosis and/or PMH.) |
|
Vital signs: I: O: |
|
|
Neurological/Sensory:
|
|
|
Cardiovascular:
|
|
|
Respiratory:
|
|
|
Gastrointestinal & Nutrition:
|
|
|
Musculoskeletal:
|
|
|
Genitourinary/Reproductive:
|
|
|
Integumentary (including incisions and drains):
|
|
|
IV Assessment:
|
|
|
Pain:
|
|
|
Psychosocial:
|
|
|
|
|
Laboratory Tests (relevant admission and current labs)
|
Date |
Lab Test |
Abnormal Lab Results |
Normal Range |
Rationale for performing test |
Relationship between/among test results with client’s condition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diagnostic Tests (x-rays, CT scans, endoscopies, etc.)
|
Date |
Test |
Reason for test |
Results/Findings |
Analysis of relationship between diagnosis test and client’s condition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medications
|
Trade Name |
Generic Name |
Medication Classification |
Therapeutic Use |
Major adverse effects |
Time dosage |
Route of administration |
Nursing Consideration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nursing Diagnoses
List 3 pertinent nursing diagnoses for your patient and prioritize them. Two actual problems and one at-risk problem. Outcomes need to be SMART – specific, measurable, attainable, realistic and time specific. The collaborative interventions are what you do with another healthcare discipline (resp therapy, PT/OT, pharmacy, case manager, dietician, wound ostomy specialists, etc. It is not another nurse, nurse tech or notifying the MD/HCP)
|
Nursing Diagnosis #1: |
|
|
R/T:
|
AEB:
|
|
Interventions (3)
|
Expected Outcome (3 -Measurable): |
Collaborative Interventions (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nursing Diagnosis #2: |
|
|
R/T:
|
AEB:
|
|
Interventions (3)
|
Expected Outcome (3 - Measurable): |
Collaborative Interventions (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nursing Diagnosis #3: |
|
|
R/T:
|
AEB:
|
|
Interventions (3)
|
Expected Outcome (3 - Measurable): |
Collaborative Interventions (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Routine Nursing Management – what you can do independently. Each rationale needs to have evidence-based peer-journal reference cited
Interdisciplinary Care
· Collaborative Management
|
Member of the Team |
Brief description of the role & responsibilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· Therapeutic Modalities – The rationale must be included for each modality. The rationale must be evidence-based peer-journal referenced cited.
Nursing Reflection
Must include:
· Analysis of communication style preferences among interdisciplinary team members and with the critically‐ ill individual and family members;
· Analysis of the impact of own communication style on others
· Description of system barriers and facilitators in relation to the quality of care/outcomes for the critically‐ ill individual
· Discussion of recommendations to the organizational system for enhancing interdisciplinary collaboration, which are supported by at least two (2) evidence‐ based literature
· Description of ideas for own professional self‐ development plan to enhance own potential for becoming an effective member in an interdisciplinary team.