NEEDS ANALYSIS FOR CHANGE
[email protected]
NHS6008.docxNHS6008 U05A1 - NEEDS ANALYSIS FOR CHANGE LEARNER: JENNIFER , FRANKS
INSTRUCTIONS
Use the following scoring guide, along with the project information, for evaluating each learner's work.
Top of Form
OVERALL COMMENTS
Your instructor selected the following reason for this evaluation: You submitted the wrong assignment or submitted the assignment incorrectly. I'm giving this a score of zero so you will be able to resubmit.
Jennifer,
I am returning this submission to you. Your safe-assign score is 79% and matches the work of other learners, not your own. This submission is a violation of Capella University policy 3.01.01, Academic Integrity and Honesty.
This submission is also not consistent with your first assignment submission in this course. Your original chosen topic was SDoH. The quality of the work has significant discrepancies.
Please contact me via the course room to discuss this.
Dr. Merritt
RUBRICS
CRITERIA 1
Summarize the chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and community.(15%)COMPETENCY
Analyze the effects of financial and economic factors (such as cost-benefit, supply and demand, return on investment, and risks) in a health care system on patient care, services offered, and organizational structures and operation.
NON_PERFORMANCEDoes not provide any type of summary of the chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and community. BASICProvides an unclear or incomplete summary of the chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and community. PROFICIENTSummarizes the chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and community. DISTINGUISHEDSummarizes the chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and community. Notes the rationale for pursing the issue, as well as a gap contributing to it.
COMMENTS:
Please see overall comments.
CRITERIA 2
Identify any socioeconomic or diversity disparities that exist with how your chosen economic issue impacts any particular groups or populations.(20%)COMPETENCY
Develop ethical and culturally equitable solutions to economic problems within a health care organization in an effort to improve the quality of care and services offered.
NON_PERFORMANCEDoes not identify any disparities that exist with regards to the chosen economic issue. BASICIdentifies disparities that exist with regards to the chosen economic issue. However, does not relate the disparities to any socioeconomic or diversity considerations. PROFICIENTIdentifies any socioeconomic or diversity disparities that exist with how your chosen economic issue impacts any particular groups or populations. DISTINGUISHEDIdentifies any socioeconomic or diversity disparities that exist with how your chosen economic issue impacts any particular groups or populations. Supports assertion by using at least one piece of evidence (public health data, aggregated data from an organization, or other scholarly resource).
COMMENTS:
Please see overall comments.
CRITERIA 3
Explain the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources regarding the need to address your chosen issue and pursue potential change or implementation plans.(20%)COMPETENCY
Justify the qualitative and quantitative information used to guide economic decision making to stakeholders and colleagues.
NON_PERFORMANCEDoes not identify the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources. BASICIdentifies the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources, but the relevance to regarding the need to address the chosen issue is unclear or misaligned. PROFICIENTExplains the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources regarding the need to address your chosen issue and pursue potential change or implementation plans. DISTINGUISHEDExplains the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources regarding the need to address your chosen issue and pursue potential change or implementation plans. Cites at least four relevant evidence-based or scholarly sources to support explanation.
COMMENTS:
Please see overall comments.
CRITERIA 4
Explain the predicted outcomes and opportunities for growth as the result of the proposed change or implementation plan.(20%)COMPETENCY
Develop ethical and culturally equitable economic strategies to address dynamic environmental forces and ensure the future security of an organization's resources and its ability to provide quality care.
NON_PERFORMANCEDoes not identify possible outcomes and opportunities of growth. BASICIdentifies possible outcomes and opportunities of growth, but their relationship to the proposed change or implementation plan is unclear. PROFICIENTExplains the predicted outcomes and opportunities for growth as the result of the proposed change or implementation plan. DISTINGUISHEDExplains the predicted outcomes and opportunities for growth as the result of the proposed change or implementation plan. Notes the specific economic benefits for patients and the organization.
COMMENTS:
Please see overall comments.
CRITERIA 5
Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.(25%)COMPETENCY
Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella's writing standards.
NON_PERFORMANCEDoes not convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and writing scholarly standards. BASICConveys purpose, in an appropriate tone or style. Clear, effective communication is inhibited by insufficient supporting evidence and/or minimal adherence to applicable writing standards. PROFICIENTConveys purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards. Attempts to apply APA style and formatting. DISTINGUISHEDConveys clear purpose, in a tone and style well-suited to the intended audience. Supports assertions, arguments, and conclusions with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards, including APA style and formatting. Notes the specific economic benefits for patients and the organization.
COMMENTS:
Please see overall comments.
SUPPLEMENTAL FEEDBACK
Bottom of Form
