Short Answer Question

 Your answers appear to be nonsensical. Did you write these responses yourself? I want to give this opportunity for you to explain why this is the case. Can you please elaborate on your answers and address the highlighted sentences below. It is unclear to me.

1.      What is your most saved character? What is your most killed character?             

The partitioned decision of a driver in the event of a frontal impact that results in a fatality is deemed unpredictable, intuitive, and quasi under the law. We may infer from the driver's reply that he had no intention of doing anything wrong (Fleetwood, 2017). On the other contrary, autonomous cars must be pre-programmed before they can decide what steps are needed. In the M.I.T. Moral Machine Exercise, the most killed character concerning the survey and decision is the dog. As per the same assay, the most saved character is humans crossing the road in survey section six. The choice is based on life preferences where humans are saved. 

2.      How much does saving the greatest number of lives matter to you? How much does protecting passengers' lives matter to you? 

Utilitarianism asserts that the best moral action is the one that results in the most happiness for the most people. This logic dictates that a driverless car should do whatever it takes to save as many people as possible, whether or not they are in the vehicle itself (Fleetwood, 2017). If an autonomous vehicle collides with a wall and kills everyone on board, it should keep going even if it hits a pedestrian who is not at fault. 

3.      How much does upholding the law matter to you? How much does avoiding intervention matter to you? 

Despite its seeming simplicity, Act Utilitarianism by John Stuart Mill comes with substantial drawbacks. There aren't many situations where drivers must choose between life and death in a single second (Himmelreich, 2018). When self-driving vehicles become common, they may have to choose between harming a pedestrian or a passenger in the future. 

4.      Do your results indicate strong preference to a certain gender, age, fitness, or perceived social value?  

The results in the survey are not based on gender and social perception based on economic and religious backgrounds. However, the test favors the younger. The favor to the youths is based on the financial contribution in the sample country (Fleetwood, 2017). The aged have gained less popularity in the survey due to their lessened life estimation. Increasing the number of road signs along key thoroughfares may help reduce the number of traffic accidents. There should be enough signage to inform vehicles of the elevation change of the road and help them in slowing down. Increasing the number of car accidents may result from removing road mobility limitations. 

5.      If you were to provide your recommendation to a government regulator, would you advocate for regulation of the industry? If so, would you recommend a utilitarian or duty-based mandate?  

Regulations improve the safety of driving. However, such limitations make it more trustworthy. In order to minimize the number of catastrophes, lawmakers, non-government staff should draft legislation (Himmelreich, 2018). It is possible to police traffic laws more rigorously if there are traffic cops on the road. In order to assist minimize the accident rate, Kenyans should practice safe driving habits. As a motorway privacy and protection association, they engage the general populace on a range of highway safety and security problems. Our products and services have helped us establish a global brand. We can tell you more about our fleet management alternatives, such as automobile speed restrictions when you contact authorities straight away. 

6.      Is there anything about your results that surprised you?  

The surprise to the survey is that when a motorist causes a deadly car accident, the legal system assumes that the driver's split-second reaction is random, intuitive, and nondiscriminatory (Himmelreich, 2018). From the driver's response, it's safe to infer that he was acting in good faith. It is the responsibility of drivers to instruct self-driving cars on what actions to take before they go off on their own. It's possible that the design of an automobile puts the driver's safety first or lowers the danger to others. Before a self-driving car collision occurs, coders or decision-makers may have chosen how the outcome will be. Consider these competing views to better comprehend autonomous vehicle source code and strategic strategy. Utility theory states that the optimal course of action benefits the most people, including oneself.