Summary of Article

Grid View

List View

Inadequate Not Competent Competent Proficient

Content of Review

Points:

0 (0.00%)

No content (missed all major points of the content).  Incomplete summary.  Key ideas/themes/findings are not communicated clearly and/or missed in analysis.  There is no clear introduction or conclusion.

Points:

20 (20.00%)

 Minimal analysis of the content (some of the major points discussed).  Basic summary.  Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with little clarity or insight.  Introduction and conclusion do not indicate the overall focus of the paper.

Points:

32 (32.00%)

 Comprehensive analysis of the content (most of the major points discussed).  Adequate summary.  Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with considerable clarity, but lacks insight.  Engaging introduction and conclusion, paper focus inconsistently supported.

Points:

40 (40.00%)

 In depth analysis of the content (all major points discussed).  Excellent summary.  Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with a high degree of clarity and insight.  Engaging introduction and conclusion, both indicate the overall focus of the paper.

Reflection

Points:

0 (0.00%)

 Demonstrates little understanding of the article with few or no key findings reported.

Points:

15 (15.00%)

 Demonstrates some understanding of the article by listing some of the key findings…but documentation is lacking in completeness.

Points:

24 (24.00%)

 Demonstrates considerable understanding of the article by listing all of the key findings

Points:

30 (30.00%)

 Demonstrates thorough understanding of the article by listing all key findings and reflecting upon their implications.

Organization and Development of Ideas

Points:

0 (0.00%)

 No evidence of structure or organization.

Points:

7.5 (7.50%)

 Logical organization, paragraphs not fully developed

Points:

12 (12.00%)

 Logical organization, paragraph development not perfected.

Points:

15 (15.00%)

 Logical development of ideas through welldeveloped paragraphs, good use of transitions.

Mechanics

Points:

0 (0.00%)

 Length requirement is not met; poor content  Numerous grammatical errors (distracting)  Numerous punctuation errors  Neither style is used  Does not adhere to Font/Spacing Guidelines.

Points:

7.5 (7.50%)

 Length requirement is not met; minimal content  5-6 grammatical errors  5-6 punctuation errors  Demonstrates little ability to adhere to APA/MLA guidelines, more than two errors present  Adheres to neither Font nor Spacing Guidelines.

Points:

12 (12.00%)

 Length requirement is met with adequate content  3-4 grammatical errors.  3-4 punctuation errors.  Adheres consistently to APA/MLA guidelines, however, one error present.  Adheres to either Font or Spacing Guidelines, but not both

Points:

15 (15.00%)

 Meets length requirement.  1-2 grammatical errors.  1-2 punctuation errors.  APA/MLA Guidelines are meticulously followed.  Adheres to Font/Spacing Guidelines.