300 W7 Discussion

profileTie3D
Neuman_Ch_10.ppt

This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following are prohibited by law: any public performance or display, including transmission of any image over a network; preparation of any derivative work, including the extraction, in whole or in part, of any images; any rental, lease or lending of the program.

Observing People in Natural Setting

Chapter 10

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

What is Field Research?

  • Field research produces qualitative data.
  • Field researchers directly observe and participate in a natural social setting.
  • There are several kinds of field research:
  • ethnography
  • participant-observation research
  • informal “depth” interviews
  • focus groups

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

What is Field Research?

  • Ethnography = A detailed description of insider meanings and cultural knowledge of living cultures in natural settings.

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Studying People in the Field

  • Naturalism = The principle that we learn best by observing ordinary events in a natural setting, not in a contrived, invented, or researcher-created setting

Preparing for a Field Study

Increasing Self Awareness

Conducting Background Investigation

Practice observing and writing

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Studying People in the Field

Starting the Research Project

  • Getting Organized.
  • Selecting a Field Site
  • Field Site = Any location or set of locations in which field research takes place. It usually has on-going social interaction and a shared culture.
  • Containment
  • Richness
  • Unfamiliarity
  • Suitability

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Studying People in the Field

Starting the Research Project

  • Gaining Access
  • Gatekeeper = Someone with the formal or informal authority to control access to a field site.
  • Entering the Field
  • Presentation of self
  • Disclosure
  • Social Roles

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Studying People in the Field

Being in the Field

Learning the Ropes.

Normalizing Social Research

  • Normalize = How a field researcher helps field site members redefine social research from unknown and potentially threatening to something normal, comfortable and familiar.

Building Rapport and Trust.

Negotiating continuously

Deciding a degree of Involvement

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Studying People in the Field

Strategies for Success in the Field

  • Building relationships
  • Performing small favors
  • Appearing interested and exercising selective inattention
  • Appearance of interest = A micro strategy to build or maintain relationships in which a researcher acts interested even when he or she is actually bored and uninterested.

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Studying People in the Field

Strategies for Success in the Field

  • Being an earnest novice
  • Avoiding Conflicts
  • Adopting an Attitude of Strangeness
  • Attitude of Strangeness = A perspective in which the field researcher questions and notices ordinary details by looking at the ordinary through the eyes of a stranger.

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Studying People in the Field

Observing and Collecting Data

  • The Researcher is a Data Collection Instrument
  • What to Observe
  • Physical appearance
  • People and their behavior

People’s actions

The context in which events occur

Exactly what people say

  • When “Nothing” Happens.

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Studying People in the Field

Observing and Collecting Data

  • Sampling 
  • observations from all possible times, locations, people, situations, types of events, or contexts of interest.
  • sample three types of field site events: routine, special, and unanticipated.

Routine

Special

Unanticipated 

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Studying People in the Field

Observing and Collecting Data

  • Becoming a Skillful Note-Taker
  • Types of Notes

Jotted notes = Optional very short notes of a few words written very inconspicuously in the field site that are only to trigger memory later.

Supplements

How to take notes

Maps and diagrams

  • Recordings to Supplement Memory.  

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Studying People in the Field

Interviewing in Field Research

  • Types of Questions in Field Interviews
  • Descriptive Questions
  • Structural Questions
  • Contrast Questions
  • Informant = A member in a field site with whom a researcher develops a relationship, and who tells the researcher many details about life in the field state.

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Studying People in the Field

Leaving the Field

  • exiting can be disruptive or emotionally painful
  • depends on specifics of the field setting and relationships developed

Writing the Field Research Report

  • start to think about what will appear in a report while still gathering data
  • book-length or long descriptive articles

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Ethics and the Field Researcher

  • Privacy is the most common ethical issue.
  • Confidentiality must be maintained.
  • Personal risk potential.

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Focus Groups

  • Focus Group = A qualitative research technique that involves informal group interviews about a topic.
  • Advantages
  • Limitations

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Focus Groups

  • Advantages:
  • fast, easy to do, and inexpensive
  • natural setting helps to increase external validity
  • provides new insights and ideas for questions and answer categories
  • gives a window into how people naturally discuss topics
  • allows participants to query one another and explain their answers to each others
  • encourages open expression among members of marginalized social groups
  • helps people feel empowered by a group setting

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009

Focus Groups

  • Limitations
  • cannot generalize discussion outcomes to large, diverse population
  • creates group “polarization effect”
  • limited to discussing one or a few topics per session
  • moderator may unknowingly limit full, open, and free expression
  • participants tend to produce fewer ideas than in individual interviews
  • large quantity of results can be difficult to analyze
  • rarely report all details of study design/procedure
  • difficult to reconcile differences between responses given by individual-only interview and those from a focus group