For Wendy Lewis only

profileappletree123
NegotiatingAssessments_Scales.zip

Negotiating Assessments_Scales/Communication Competence Scale.doc

Questionnaire

Communication Competence Scoring Key (page 691)

Planning Cognitions

1. ___5_____

9. ___5_____

12. ___5_____

15. ___5_____

19. ___3_____

Total: __23______

Reflection Cognitions

4. ____5______

6. ____5______

10. ____5______

14. ____5______

20. ____3______

Total:___23_______

Presence Cognitions

3. ____4_____

7. ____4_____

17. ____4_____

22. ____3_____

Total: ___15_____

Consequence Conditions

5. ____5______

11. ____5______

16. ____5______

21. ____3______

Total: ___18______

Modeling Cognitions

2. ____4______

8. ____5______

13. ____4______

18. ____3______

Total: ___16______

PAGE

Negotiating Assessments_Scales/Cultural Intelligence Scale.doc

Cultural Intelligence Scale (page 693)

Scoring the Instrument

The CQS measures four dimensions of Cultural Intelligence: CQ-Strategy, CQ-Knowledge, CQ-Drive, and CQ-Action.

( Items 1-4 measure “metacognitive” or strategic elements of CQ.

( Items 5-10 measure “cognitive” or knowledge elements of CQ.

( Items 11-15 measure “motivational” or drive elements of CQ.

( Items 16-20 measure “behavioral” or action elements of CQ.

Calculate an average of your scores on each of the four separate dimensions. For example, averaging one’s responses to items 1-4 will yield a CQ-Strategy score between 1 and 7.

Next average the four dimension scores to compute your overall CQ score.

Submit your total CQ scores as well as your four dimension scores so that I can calculate class averages and/or creation of score distributions.

My scores:

Metacognitive

Cognitive

Motivational

Behavioral

Total

24

22

27

27

Average

6

3.66

5.4

5.4

Overall CQ

Total

100

Average

25

Negotiating Assessments_Scales/SINS II Scale SCORING KEY.doc

SINS II Scale SCORING KEY (pAGE 680)

(Based On Robinson, Lewicki, & Donahue, 1997, and Fulmer, Barry, & Long, 2009)

Traditional Competitive Bargaining

Item 10 ___7__

Item 12 ___5__

Item 23 ___6__

Total __18___

Average T/3 ___6__ (5.50)*

Attacking Opponent’s Network

Item 5 __1___

Item 15 __1___

Item 19 __1___

Total __3___

Average T/3 __1___ (1.91)

False Promises

Item 1 __2___

Item 14 __3___

Item 24 __3___

Total __8___

Average T/3 __2.66___ (2.06)

Misrepresentation

Item 3 __2___

Item 6 __2___

Item 16 __7____

Item 18 __1___

Total __12___

Average T/4 __3___ (3.02)

Inappropriate Information Gathering

Item 8 __1___

Item 21 __4___

Item 25 __3___

Total __8___

Average T/3 __2.66___ (2.35)

Strategic Misrepresentation of Positive Emotion

Item 2 __4___

Item 7 __5___

Item 17 __7___

Total __16___

Average T/3 __5.33___ (5.09)

Strategic Misrepresentation of Negative Emotion

Item 4 ___1___

Item 9 ___3___

Item 11 ___2___

Item 13 ___5___

Item 20 ___1___

Item 22 ___1___

Total __13_____

Av. T/6 ___2.166___ (4.82)

* Numbers represent mean ratings for groups of MBAs at leading business schools.

PAGE

Negotiating Assessments_Scales/Six Channels Inventory.doc

SCORING THE SIX CHANNELS OF PERSUASION SURVEY (page 682)

Column 1 Column 2

What I need to do to What I would be more

be more effective within comfortable doing if

my organization: I could choose:

# of A’s = __4__ # of A’s = __2__

# of B’s = __4__ # of B’s = __3__

# of C’s = __7__ # of C’s = __2__

# of D’s = __5__ # of D’s = __5__

# of E’s = __7__ # of E’s = __1__

# of F’s = __4__ # of F’s = __4__

TOTAL: _31___ TOTAL: _17__

(should=30) (should=30)

Negotiating Assessments_Scales/SVI Scale - 1 (Knights_Excalibur negotiation).doc

the SUBJECTIVE VALUE INVENTORY (SVI)

The Subjective Value Inventory (SVI) is a questionnaire designed to measure social psychological outcomes of a negotiation, such as satisfaction, interpersonal rapport, and impressions of oneself. The questionnaire will be used in conjunction with the second and third negotiation simulations (the paired negotiation and the team negotiation). These are the objectives associated with using the SVI:

1. To help you learn to conceptualize your performance in a negotiation along multiple dimensions;

2. To help you compare your own perspectives following negotiations to those perspectives held by others;

3. To provide you with individualized feedback concerning the impressions that their negotiation counterparts hold about them.

Following the close of each negotiation simulation, you are to complete this questionnaire. Your information will then be input online (information will be provided at the time detailing how to do this). In this way, feedback on the entire class averages and your team’s averages (for the third negotiation) will be available to you in addition to your own ratings. For now, just look over the questionnaire and the scoring key which follows.

Four dimensions of subjective valuE

1. Feelings about the Instrumental Outcome

2. Feelings about Oneself

3. Feelings about the Process

4. Feelings about the Relationship

Subjective Value Inventory Scoring Key (svi) (PAGE 483)

(Based on Curhan, Elfenbein, and Xu, 2005)

Feelings about the Instrumental Outcome

Item 1 __7___

Item 2 __7___

8 minus Item 3 __5___

Item 4 _(n/a)__

Total __19___

Average (Total/4) _4.75__ (a)

Feelings about Oneself

8 minus Item 5 __7___

Item 6 __6___

Item 7 __4___

Item 8 __5___

Total __22___

Average (Total/4) __5.5___ (b)

Feelings about the Process

Item 9 __6___

Item 10 __6___

Item 11 __7___

Item 12 __6___

Total __25___

Average (Total/4) _3.57___ (c)

Feelings about the Relationship

Item 13 __7___

Item 14 __7___

Item 15 __7___

Item 16 __6___

Total __27___

Average (Total/4) __6.75___ (d)

Global Subjective Value

Total lines a through d _20.57__

Average (Total/4) _5.1425_

PAGE

Negotiating Assessments_Scales/SVI Scale - 2 (group negotiation).doc

the SUBJECTIVE VALUE INVENTORY (SVI) (page 483)

The Subjective Value Inventory (SVI) is a questionnaire designed to measure social psychological outcomes of a negotiation, such as satisfaction, interpersonal rapport, and impressions of oneself. The questionnaire will be used in conjunction with the second and third negotiation simulations (the paired negotiation and the team negotiation). These are the objectives associated with using the SVI:

1. To help you learn to conceptualize your performance in a negotiation along multiple dimensions;

2. To help you compare your own perspectives following negotiations to those perspectives held by others;

3. To provide you with individualized feedback concerning the impressions that their negotiation counterparts hold about them.

Following the close of each negotiation simulation, you are to complete this questionnaire. Your information will then be input online (information will be provided at the time detailing how to do this). In this way, feedback on the entire class averages and your team’s averages (for the third negotiation) will be available to you in addition to your own ratings. For now, just look over the questionnaire and the scoring key which follows.

Four dimensions of subjective valuE

1. Feelings about the Instrumental Outcome

2. Feelings about Oneself

3. Feelings about the Process

4. Feelings about the Relationship

Subjective Value Inventory Scoring Key

(Based on Curhan, Elfenbein, and Xu, 2005)

Feelings about the Instrumental Outcome

Item 1 __3___

Item 2 __4___

8 minus Item 3 __6___

Item 4 __3___

Total __16___

Average (Total/4) __4__ (a)

Feelings about Oneself

8 minus Item 5 __n/a___

Item 6 __7___

Item 7 __2___

Item 8 __5___

Total __14___

Average (Total/4) __3.5__ (b)

Feelings about the Process

Item 9 __6___

Item 10 __6___

Item 11 __4___

Item 12 __6___

Total __22___

Average (Total/4) __5.5___ (c)

Feelings about the Relationship

Item 13 __7___

Item 14 __4___

Item 15 __4___

Item 16 __4___

Total __19___

Average (Total/4) _4.75___ (d)

Global Subjective Value

Total lines a through d _17.75__

Average (Total/4) _4.43__

PAGE

Negotiating Assessments_Scales/Trust Scale Scores.doc

Trust Scale Scoring Key (page 686)

Calculus Based Trust Items

1. __5___

5. __5__

9. __3___

13. __3___

17. __2___

21. __3___

25. __3___

29. __3___

Total __27____

Calculus-Based Distrust Items

2. __3___

6. __3___

10. __3___

14. __4___

18. __3___

22. __4___

26. __4___

30. __3___

Total __27____

Identification-Based Trust Items

3. __3___

7. __5___

11. __3___

15. __5___

19. __3___

23. __3___

27. __3___

31. __3___

Total __28____

Identification-Based Distrust Items

4. __3___

8. __1___

12. __2___

16. __5___

20. __3___

24. __3___

28. __3___

32. __3___

Total __23____