| Rubric for the ITEC 625 Individual Research Paper |
| Criteria (Weight) |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Score |
Multiplier |
Total |
| 1. Knowledge and Understanding of Computer Systems Architecture (60%) Demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter |
Paper reflects a strong depth of knowledge and understanding of computer systems architecture concepts. Information presented is accurate and relevant. |
Paper reflects an adequate depth of knowledge and understanding of computer systems architecture concepts. Minor inaccuracies were noted and the information was generally relevant. |
Paper reflects a limited depth of knowledge and understanding of computer systems architecture concepts. Several inaccuracies were noted and some irrelevant material was present. |
Paper reflects a lack of knowledge and understanding of computer systems architecture concepts.. The paper is fraught with inaccurate information that was often irrelevant. |
| 15 |
0 |
| 2. Writing Style (20%) Illustrates communication skills dealing with writing |
Word choice is consistently precise and accurate. The tone is consistently professional and appropriate for a scholarly paper. The writing is free or almost free of errors. |
Word choice is acceptable. The tone is generally professional. For the most part, it is appropriate for a scholarly paper. There are occasional errors, but they do not represent a major distraction or obscure meaning. |
Word choice is merely adequate, and the range of words is limited. Some words are used inappropriately. The tone is not consistently appropriate for a scholarly paper. The writing has many errors, and the reader is distracted by them. |
Many words are used inappropriately, confusing the reader. The tone is inappropriate. It is not a scholarly paper. There are so many errors that meaning is obscured. The reader is confused. |
| 5 |
0 |
| 3. References (10%) Measures the depth and quality of research |
References are scholarly, primarily peer-reviewed professional journals or other approved sources (e.g., official government documents). The reader is confident that the information and ideas can be trusted. |
References are broad and varied. Most references are scholarly. The reader is uncertain of the reliability of a few of the sources. |
Most of the references are from sources that are not peer- reviewed and have uncertain reliability (e.g., wikis and blogs). The reader doubts the accuracy of much of the material presented. |
There are virtually no sources that are professionally reliable. The reader seriously doubts the value of the material. |
| 2.5 |
0 |
| 4. APA Format (10%) Determines the level of compliance with the latest APA Style Manual |
APA format is used accurately and consistently particularly on the "References" page. |
APA format is used with minor errors. |
There are frequent errors in APA format. |
Format of the “References” page and other elements are not recognizable as APA. |
| 2.5 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
| 0 |
| Comments: |