write two page essay

profileghtyui52000
NaturalEnvironmentStakeholder.pptx

Spheres of Influence Current Society?

Public

Private

Economic

Political

Social

Ecological

“Capitalist economies are geared first and foremost to the growth of profits, and hence to economic growth at virtually any cost—including the exploitation and misery of the vast majority of the world’s population. This rush to grow generally means rapid absorption of energy and materials and the dumping of more and more wastes into the environment—hence widening environmental degradation.” - John Bellamy Foster Ecology Against Capitalism

https :// www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDIb2uEirT0

https:// www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/mar/27/rockefeller-family-tried-and-failed-exxonmobil-accept-climate-change

How Much Does Nature Give Us for Free?

Global GNP

(US $18 trillion)

Ecosystem Services

(US $33 trillion)

3

Estimates of Human Economic Activities and Ecosystem Services

What are nature’s life-support services worth? Practitioners in the young field of ecological economics believe concrete numbers are required to help nations avoid unsustainable economic choices. In one of the first efforts to calculate a global number, a team of researchers has put an average price tag of US$33 trillion a year on these fundamental ecosystem services. That is nearly twice the value of the global gross national product of US$18 trillion. For more information see http://www.wri.org/wri/trends/ecoserv.html.

Source: Adapted from R. Costanza et al., “The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital,” Nature, Vol. 387 (1997), p. 256, Table 2.

The Environmental Challenge Ahead

Emerging participation of developing countries

Increasing material aspirations

Competition for resources

Migration

Scarcity of natural resources

Increasing demand for oil & gas

Scarcity of water

Environmental & social problems

Climate change

Environmental degradation

Child labor; poor social standards

4

Energy Source Comparison

6

Ecological Footprints

The average American uses 24 acres to support his or her current lifestyle. In comparison, the average Canadian lives on a footprint 30 percent smaller (17 acres), and the average Italian on a footprint 60 percent smaller.

http://www.storyofstuff.com/

Biomimicry

Upcycle

Quantifying Ecosystem

Services

SRI

VCI

Reuse

Upcycle

A New Environmental Paradigm?

Nature is an adversary to be conquered

Man is superior to nature

Man is superior to other animal and plant species

Humans must accept pollution risks

Future generations have few rights

Economic development has priority

Corporations may exploit nature

Nature is an indispensable ally in struggle to survive

Humans are part of interdependent community

Humans have duty to protect rights of other animals and plants

Humans have natural right to pure environment

Future generations must not be endangered

Corporations have duty to protect nature

Dominant Western Worldview

New Environmental Paradigm

“Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.” Brundtland Declaration, 1987

Or, more simply,

“Don’t take more than your share.”

Sustainable Development

By itself, the Brundtland definition is insufficient. ..

How does one define "needs," as opposed to wants or even excessive luxury? Is a lowering of living standards acceptable? Is barely enough to eat and minimal shelter good enough? What about education and medical care? Does sustainability imply some equity in distribution of goods, or might an increasing gap between rich and poor meet the sustainability test (if environmental and population stability are achieved)? Is ecosystem health important for itself, or only as it sustains humans?

Sustainable Development

Sustainability as Hierarchy of Needs

Marshall & Toffel

Sustainability as Triple Bottom Line

Sustainable development requires environmental health, economic prosperity and social equity. Earth Council

The Movement with No Name

“The movement has three basic roots: environmental activism, social justice initiatives, and indigenous cultures’ resistance to globalization, all of which have become intertwined.”

The "immune response" of humanity to protect

itself from the forces of depredation—

"social antibodies attaching themselves to

the pathologies of power"

Paul Hawken

“Natural Capitalism”

Radical Resource Productivity

slows resource depletion at one end, lowers pollution at other end

Biomimicry

redesign industrial systems along biological lines

Service and Flow Economy

a new perception of value, a shift from the acquisition of goods as measure of affluence to an economy where continuous receipt of quality and utility promotes well-being

Green Accounting/Investing

reversing world-wide planetary destruction through accounting and reinvestment techniques that sustain, restore, and expand stocks of natural capital

Eco-efficiency is not good enough!

Eco-efficiency principle: getting more for less, fewer throwaways, reduced use of resources, and inflicting less harm in the process of attaining more products or services.

While reducing and minimizing is commendable, the compounded effect of a growing population and greater needs is accruing in a crescendo of waste to squander, of new poisons adding to an already lethal toxic scourge, and a befouling of what is already contaminated.

Recycling has, in reality, turned into down cycling, where materials being re-processed lose their original qualities, often of a poorer standard, and are only suitable for downgraded applications, pre-destined for a landfill or an incinerator.

“Eco-efficiency is a reactionary approach, a strategy for damage management and guilt reduction that doesn’t address the necessity of a fundamental redesign of the industrial material f lows. Traditionally, people define environment protection by destroying a little less.”

- Michael Braungart

William McDonough & Michael Braungart

Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things

21

23

Estimates of Human Economic Activities and Ecosystem Services

What are nature’s life-support services worth? Practitioners in the young field of ecological economics believe concrete numbers are required to help nations avoid unsustainable economic choices. In one of the first efforts to calculate a global number, a team of researchers has put an average price tag of US$33 trillion a year on these fundamental ecosystem services. That is nearly twice the value of the global gross national product of US$18 trillion. For more information see http://www.wri.org/wri/trends/ecoserv.html.

Source: Adapted from R. Costanza et al., “The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital,” Nature, Vol. 387 (1997), p. 256, Table 2.

Artifacts & Behaviors

Espoused Values

long-term thinking

Basic Assumptions

sustainability is good for

business & stakeholders

perks & subsidies for sustainable innovations

telecommuting & flexible work options

respect for nature

Sustainable

Organization

Culture

24

"The more our world functions like the natural world, the more likely we are to endure on this home that is ours, but not ours alone."

~ Janine Benyus

25

The Golden

Streamlining

Principle

Velco Fasteners

Friction-Reducing

Sharkskin

Endorsed by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, who believes in a massive global stimulus for a green future: “An investment that fights climate change, creates millions of green jobs and spurs green growth.”

Impossible under the neoliberal policy regime, in which all countries are forced to concentrate their resources on “competitiveness” in the global market, rather than on meeting social and environmental needs. Currently, public employment and investment in climate protection are defined as costs that detract from competitiveness. Countries that pursue them are punished by international policy discrimination and capital flight.

According to UNEP, the objectives should be to create jobs and restore the financial system and global economy to health; to put the post-crisis economy on a sustainable path that deals with ecological scarcity and climate instability; and to end extreme poverty. It spells out investments and policy reforms to achieve these goals.

In order to move the world toward greater equality, this must be complemented by a new regulatory regime that protects labor and social rights around the world and that rewards rather than punishes countries for implementing such rights. WTO rules should be revised.

A Global Green New Deal?

Coal

Natural Gas

Oil

Hydroelectric

Wind

Geothermal

Solar

Biofuels

Nuclear Fission

Nuclear Fusion

Capital Cost

Cost

Stability

Maintenance Costs

Infrastructure Cost

Land Use

Gas Emissions

Solid Waste

Other Waste

Noise

Visual / Cosmetic

Social

Fuel

Sites

Raw Materials

Political Stability

Maturity

Construction Time

ReliabilityCapacity Factors

Economics

Environment

Energy Supply

Fuel Cost

Other impacts

Availability

Technology

Sheet1

Coal Natural Gas Oil Hydroelectric Wind Geothermal Solar Biofuels Nuclear Fission Nuclear Fusion
Economics Capital Cost
Fuel Cost Cost
Stability
Maintenance Costs
Infrastructure Cost
Environment Land Use
Gas Emissions
Solid Waste
Other Waste
Other impacts Noise
Visual / Cosmetic
Social
Energy Supply Availability Fuel
Sites
Raw Materials
Political Stability
Technology Maturity
Construction Time
Reliability Capacity Factors

Sheet2

Sheet3