|
NURS_5051_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 5- to 6-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following:· Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.· Define and explain nursing informatics.
|
|
25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
Ably synthesize the literature and course resources to present a clear and accurate explanation of the 2 concepts....The presentation clearly and accurately explains the concept of a knowledge worker....The presentation clearly and accurately defines and explains nursing informatics.
|
22 to >19.0 pts
Good
Summarize the literature and course resources to present a clear and accurate explanation of the 2 concepts....The presentation explains the concept of a knowledge worker. ...The presentation defines and explains nursing informatics.
|
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The presentation is missing one of the concepts or one of the concepts is superficially addressed.
|
17 to >0 pts
Poor
The presentation is missing two concepts or the concepts are superficially addressed.
|
|
25 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a graphic visual representation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker. On the slide, include an explanation of the role.
|
|
15 to >13.0 pts
Excellent
The presentation includes a detailed graphic and explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
|
13 to >11.0 pts
Good
The presentation includes a graphic and an adequate explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
|
11 to >10.0 pts
Fair
The presentation includes a graphic, yet the explanation of the role is not addressed or is superficially addressed.
|
10 to >0 pts
Poor
The presentation is missing a graphic, an explanation of the role, or both the graphic and explanation of the role are missing.
|
|
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresent the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from the data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues' replies.
|
|
35 to >31.0 pts
Excellent
The presentation clearly and thoroughly includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including a detailed and accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. ...The presentation incorporates peer feedback.
|
31 to >27.0 pts
Good
The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. ...The presentation incorporates peer feedback.
|
27 to >24.0 pts
Fair
The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum; one or two of the criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
|
24 to >0 pts
Poor
The presentation is missing the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum or three or more of the criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
|
|
35 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePowerPoint presentation:The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
|
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
|
4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Eighty percent of the presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
|
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Sixty to seventy nine percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
|
2 to >0 pts
Poor
Less than sixty percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources
|
|
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
Presentation includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed articles and 2 or more course resources.
|
8 to >7.0 pts
Good
Presentation includes: 2 peer-reviewed articles and 2 course resources.
|
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair
Presentation includes: 1 peer-reviewed article and 1 course resource.
|
6 to >0 pts
Poor
Presentation includes: 1 or no resources.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
|
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
|
4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
3 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The reference list and image attribution list follow correct APA format
|
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
|
4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
|
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
|
3 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
|
|
5 pts
|
Jlm1128
N6051ASSIGNMENT1WK1Rubric.docx
