D4

N512discussion.docx

This assignment entails the development of a Power Point Presentation (PPP) on your choice of an immunodeficiency disease incorporating evidence-based practice literature and reliable electronic sources. The presentation shall include at least 10 slides, excluding the title and reference slides.

Submission Parameters:

Please use the following criteria to develop your PPP:

Topic HIV/AID

· Introductory slide with at least 3 presentation objectives

· Description of an immunodeficiency disease

· A description of the disorder’s pathophysiology and clinical presentation.

· A description of the associated laboratory, radiological, or other referral diagnostic tests required with supporting references.

· Presentation of a comprehensive, holistic plan of care.

· Conclusion

· Provide brief concluding statements

· List of References in APA format (6 references minimum)

· You are encouraged to use the Notes section associated with each slide to provide more extensive discussion/narratives of the slide content.

In regards to APA format, please use the following as a guide:

· Use references throughout the Power Point Presentation

· Apply appropriate spelling, grammar, and organization throughout the Presentation

· Include a reference list at the end of the Presentation

· Attempt to use primary sources only. That said, you may cite reliable electronic sources (i.e. ANA)

Final Project Rubric

Criteria	60 Points	50 Points	40 Points	30 Points
Content - Accuracy	Provides an accurate and complete explanation of the diagnosis/disorder; its patho-physiology; clinical presentation, assessment processes, and plan of care, drawing exclusively upon relevant literature.	For the most part, explanations of the diagnosis/disorder; its patho-physiology; clinical presentation, examination, assessment processes, and plan of care, accurate and complete, drawing mostly on the relevant literature.	--Explanations of the diagnosis/ disorder; its pathophysiology; clinical presentation, assessment processes, and plan of care, are too brief, making it challenging for the reader to comprehend the breadth and depth of the material presented.	Explanations of the diagnosis/ disorder; its pathophysiology; clinical presentation, examination, assessment processes, and plan of care, contain inaccuracies or are incomplete little to no reference is made to the relevant literature.
Criteria	20 Points	16 Points	12 Points	8 Points
Research Effort	Went above and beyond to research information; included six or more unique citations from evidence-based literature	Did a very good job of researching; utilized materials provided to their full potential. Provided four to five unique citations from the evidence-based literature.	Used the material provided in an acceptable manner, providing at least three unique citations from the evidence-based literature.	Did not utilize resources effectively; did little research, providing one to two unique citations from the evidence-based