NURSING - QSEN Assignment (ZERO PLAGIARISM with APA FORMAT)
QSEN Discussion Board Rubric
|
Criteria |
Exemplary |
Accomplished |
Developing |
Beginning |
Total |
|
Describes nursing or patient care concern that needs improvement |
18-20 points |
16-17 points |
14-15 points |
13 points |
/20 |
|
|
The concern is comprehensive, clearly stated, and focused.
|
The concern is clearly stated and somewhat focused.
|
The concern is unclear and is too broadly or too narrowly focused.
|
The concern is weak or absent.
|
|
|
Describes the Evidence-based Practice and/or Quality Improvement QSEN competencies and relates significance of issue to QSEN competencies. Why is it important to explore this concern? |
18-20 points |
16-17 points |
14-15 points |
13 points |
/20 |
|
|
All components of discussion prompt thoroughly and completely addressed.
|
Most components of discussion prompt are completely addressed.
|
Limited components of discussion prompt addressed. Ideas expressed are general in nature and/or occasionally may not be relevant.
|
Minimal or no components of discussion prompt addressed. Ideas expressed lack depth, are off-topic and/or confusing to follow.
|
|
|
Describes best or preferred practices for this concern. Supports with at least one current nursing RESEARCH article.
|
22-25 points |
20-21 points |
16-19 points |
15 points |
/25 |
|
|
Thorough, logical, and clear discussion of (1) Preferred Practices and (2) How the literature relates to the practice(s) are described
|
Adequate and clear discussion of (1) Preferred Practices and (2) How the literature relates to the practice(s) are described
|
Some discussion but no clear link between (1) Preferred Practices and (2) How the literature relates to the practice(s) described
|
Minimal discussion and no link made between (1) Preferred Practices and (2) How the literature relates to the practice(s) described.
|
|
|
Describes strategies to improve practices in the health care system. Support with at least one reference. Textbooks or current nursing literature are appropriate.
|
All components of discussion prompt addressed. Thorough, logical, and clear discussion of strategies described. Literature clearly supports improved strategies discussed.
|
Most components of discussion prompt addressed. There is adequate discussion of strategies described. Literature supports improved strategies discussed.
|
Limited components of discussion prompt addressed. There is some general discussion of strategies described. Literature for supporting improved strategies is weak.
|
Minimal or no components of discussion prompt addressed. Minimal discussion of strategies described. Literature for supporting improved strategies is not relevant or missing.
|
/25 |
|
Writing Quality, Grammar & APA |
9-10 points |
7-9 points |
5-6 points |
0-4 points |
|
|
|
Posts show above average writing style using standard English, basically free from grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors. 0-1 APA errors. |
Posts show average writing style using standard English with few grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors. 2-3 APA errors. |
Posts show an average and/or casual writing style with some errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and usage. 4-5 APA errors. |
Posts show a below average/poor writing style in terms of appropriate standard English writing style, clarity, language used, and grammar. >5 APA errors. |
/10 |
|
|
|
||||
|
TOTAL POINTS (sum of all criteria) |
/100 |