Anthropology essay final

Liao 2

Cover Letter

Dear Jenny,

In this submission, I am trying to discuss a very popular myth that is “Latino or Hispanic” is a homogeneous naturally existing, easily identifiable group. They aren’t a heterogeneous group."  I am disagreeing with this myth by stating that “Latino or Hispanic” is a heterogeneous naturally existing, easily identifiable group. They aren’t a homogeneous group." because there are many reasons that give us an idea that Latino or Hispanic” is a heterogeneous group living in the United States of America.

(For draft submissions 2, 3, and final submission: In my last draft I proposed this myth (thesis statement) for the Latino history-related assignment, and the feedback given on the draft that I have received, I decided to select that slightly innovates this proposed myth by belonging Latino people to the heterogeneous group instead of homogeneous group because there are many logical reasons and proves of the statement.

For this submission, I concentrated most of my efforts on the logical reasons and proof of the statement that “Latino or Hispanic” is a heterogeneous naturally existing, easily identifiable group. They aren’t a homogeneous group."  Because there are many reasons that give us the idea that Latino or Hispanic” is a heterogeneous group living in the United States of America.

What I struggled with most was the concept of heterogeneity in the Latino or Hispanic people, and who are they, where do Hispanics or Latino originate from, who are those Latino or Hispanics, and further importantly, whereby does their unique ethnic state in U. S. manage their state and cultural clout? If I was given more time, I would like to work on that why Latino or Hispanic people converted as a heterogeneous group because it is very famous that they belong to a homogeneous group, what would be the reasons for this? I think the strongest parts of this submission are exposing the falseness of the myth or a thesis statement, which is popular for a long time and people use to believe in this. So, debunking the statement is the strongest and interesting part for me

A question I have for you is that what are more point of views regarding Latino history, which are changed now? May be it can help in my future research. Also please give me feedback on my efforts and data.

Sincerely,

Myth 1 of Latino history

This essay focuses on the Latino history. It is considered that Latino or Hispanic is the homogeneous group in the United States of America. The history of Hispanics and Latinos in theU. S.is wide-varying, crossing stronger than 400 years and the diverging day the U. S, further. Hispanics (whether mestizo or criollo) converted to the leading residents of America in the recently taken Southwest region later the War of Mexican–America and continued a bulk in many nations till the 20th century (Holloway T. H. Latin America: What’s in a Name?). Now the question arises that with which group Latino or Hispanic belongs, homogeneous or heterogeneous? The essay presenting and discussing a myth regarding the Latino or Hispanic and My myth (thesis statement) is “Latinoor Hispanic” is a homogeneous naturally existing, easily identifiable group. They aren’t a heterogeneous group." I am disagreeing with this myth because there are many reasons that gives us an idea that Latino or Hispanic” is a heterogeneous group living in the united states of America. Benjamin Franklin once stated that why British people only established Pennsylvania, why they grow as a single or same society who should be similar to each other, who will help them to create their own personalities, perspectives, and foundations, without concentrating on their customs, culture, or language, one more importantly their color of skin?” (Rumbaut, Pigments of our imagination: On the racialization and racial identities of “Hispanics” and “Latinos”).

Latino people are among most populous society of the country

According to issued article, initial conclusions that the Latino or Hispanic community is formally the second most populous society of the country including 50.5 million or 16.3 %, of the population of United States of America (Rumbaut, Pigments of our imagination: On the racialization and racial identities of “Hispanics” and “Latinos”). This data, while engaging, proposes several issues, such as where do Hispanics or Latino originate from, who are those Latino or Hispanics, and further importantly, whereby does their unique ethnic state in U. S. manage their state and cultural clout? Latino is presently the most populous ethnic society in the U. S. Therefore, it is important that each segment of U. S. community completely assume this group as a heterogeneous group. As a very popular book regarding Latino or Hispanic, it states that as Latino people at that millennial time, and also for parts of the ruling African American and Anglo societies, democratic culture holds the central frame in conflicts across determining the purpose. Within the spell, ceremonial, and metaphorical range of traditional culture, stories are created regarding the part Latino people will not or will perform as part of the public figure (Unit 3, Kibria, Bowman and O'Leary, n.d.).

Many such as the African-American and Asian communities, (who have extended been a point in the top of identifiers of combined -race, as well as recently migrated black people from the Caribbean Islanders and Africa), the Hispanic classification will surely suffer the corresponding racial, social, and political difficulties.

Latino people are comes with many cultures

The word “Hispanic or Latino” was initially utilized to represent individuals of the Iberian Peninsula, additionally remembered as "Hispania." Yet the identifier of Hispanic did not use state till they have been measured while it was applied to describe the one belongs to Latin America, and also from sections of the Caribbean (Flores, 1997). They came from many places in a country and bring a part of culture of each place and created a new one. The usage of the word “Hispanic or Latino” itself is yet profoundly discussed and is interchanged with Spanish or Latino sometimes. It has a variety of becoming a sociological problem because it frequently lumps collectively states despite cultural and social identification, spiritual connection and also race. This is why I consider Hispanic or Latino as a heterogeneous group not a homogeneous group. Hispanic or Latino people are known to come from a part of ancestry of Spanish, Latino, or Hispanic, which affects its culture and tradition. This then placed potential cultural outcomes varying from Cuban to Spaniard to Mexican to American. This may all look interchangeable and simple; nevertheless, I identify some Dominicans, Puerto Ricans, and some Mexican people that may clasp your collar if you equal to attempt to mix all these three. This is why I consider Hispanic or Latino as a heterogeneous group not a homogeneous group.

And allow us not to ignore regarding color. As another issue preceding that described, Hispanics or Latino people in the country of America are yet demanded to distinguish themselves through the race. Comprehensive data knowledge more than 50 % of Hispanic or Latino people consider themselves as white while just 2.7 % classified themselves as black people. A still more modest % of people consider themselves as American Indian (Rumbaut, Pigments of our imagination: On the racialization and racial identities of “Hispanics” and “Latinos”). This is why I consider Hispanic or Latino as a heterogeneous group not a homogeneous group.

According to a research, black and white Hispanic people and as well as Hispanic people who state that they belong to any other race, receive varying levels of payment or salaries and remain in isolated communities based on the color of the skin  (José A. Cobas, Jorge, and Joe, 2010). Hispanic or Latino people who represent themselves as white people typically have greater profits, earnings or salaries and the most profound rate of unemployment while Hispanic or Latino people who represent themselves as black people typically have lower salaries, profits, or earnings and a greater percentage of unemployment. This is why I consider Hispanic or Latino as a heterogeneous group, not a homogeneous group.

Hispanic or Latino people have constitutional class, color, and intra-racial discrimination problems amongst themselves, that possess endured previous to their entry in the country like America (José A. Cobas, Jorge, and Joe, 2010). Presently, certain problems may just be strengthened in the so-called community of post-racial as researchers and policy-makers ignore everything that and protest to tag and describe Hispanic or Latino people in one central spot as a homogeneous group. This is why I consider Hispanic or Latino as a heterogeneous group, not a homogeneous group.

Latino people have different perspective for leadership of the country

if we discuss politically, although there is an application to handle Hispanic or Latino people as a member of a homogeneous group, Hispanic or Latino people can't be placed into great tents of voters of Democratic and Republican. Cuban people manage to place more extra to the power whereas Mexican people favor extra to the democratic. Between the Hispanic majorities, 54 % as Democratic voters, 14 % classified as Republican voters, 18 % as self-governing and 7 % as different (Rumbaut, Pigments of our imagination: On the racialization and racial identities of “Hispanics” and “Latinos”). This is why I consider Hispanic or Latino as a heterogeneous group not a homogeneous group. For instance, though Puerto Rican people may be sensitive to the situation of problems of the migration, as the residents of the United States of America. The large preponderance of this society may not respond as individually affected as Mexican people and different Hispanics from South American. The identical could be stated for Cuban American people, whose emigrant situation has not significantly constrained them to vote except the Party of Republican.

Indeed mostly it is considered that Latino or Hispanic is the homogeneous group in the United States of America. The history of Hispanics and Latinos in the U. S. is wide-varying, crossing stronger than 400 years and the diverging day the U. S, further, but recently there are many issues rises that focuses on the heterogeneity of the Latino or Hispanic group in the United States of America. There are many differences and conflicts on many matters among the members of the Latino group i.e. Mexicans, Cubans, and Spanish.

References

Flores, J. (1997). Tropicalizations: Transcultural representations of Latinidad, London: U press New England, pp. 183-193.

Holloway T. H. Latin America: What’s in a Name?, University of California, Davis

José A. Cobas, Jorge D. and Joe R. F. (2010). How the United States racializes Latinos: White hegemony and its consequences. Latino Studies, 8(2), 292-294. doi: 10.1057/lst.2010.15

Kibria, N., Bowman, C. and O'Leary, M. (n.d.). Race and immigration.

Rumbaut, R. G. Pigments of our imagination: On the racialization and racial identities of “Hispanics” and “Latinos” pp. 8-18.