Prof_Marcos A. power point and narrated document see rubric

profilejess009
MUSTHAVESTHISALL.docx

MUST HAVES THIS ALL

Reference not older than 5 years

you must have your oral CPG presentation posted by 11:59 PM ALONG WITH a copy of the article and your written transcript.

Cystitis

Jessica Ruiz – Presenter

Gupta, K., Hooton, T., Naber, K., Wullt, B., Colgan, R., et al. (2011). International Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Cystitis and Pyelonephritis in Women: A 2010 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 52(5), e103-e120.

NR511 Clinical Practice Guideline Assignment

NR511 Clinical Practice Guideline Assignment

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDisease & Background Student: 1) Identifies the disease condition 2) Gives a brief statement of incidence and prevalence in the US 3) The student briefly summarizes the disease pathophysiology and 4) Identifies the typical clinical presentation seen in a patient with the disease (4 critical elements).

15.0 pts

Exceptional- Student identifies the disease topic AND Student states the incidence and prevalence in the US AND Student provides a pathophysiology statement AND Student states the typical clinical presentation seen in a patient with the disease.

13.0 pts

Exceeds- All four (4) critical elements are present but some information may be only partially addressed or inaccurate.

12.0 pts

Meets- One to two (1-2) critical elements are missing.

6.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Three (3) critical elements are missing.

0.0 pts

Developing- All four (4) critical elements are missing.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePublication & Applicability in Primary Care The student: 1) Identifies the author, organization or group that developed the CPG, 2) Student denotes the year of the original guideline publication, 3) Student identifies any subsequent revisions (student’s reference should be the most recent version), and 4) Student discusses the applicability for use of this CPG in the primary care setting (4 critical elements).

30.0 pts

Exceptional- Student correctly identifies the author(s), organization(s), or group(s) that developed the CPG AND Student states the year of the original CPG guideline AND Student notes all subsequent revisions of the guideline (with the student’s version being the most recent) AND Student discusses how this CPG is applicable to primary care.

26.0 pts

Exceeds- All four (4) critical elements are present but some information may be only partially addressed or inaccurate.

24.0 pts

Meets- Two (2) critical elements are missing.

12.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Three (3) critical elements are missing.

0.0 pts

Developing-All four (4) critical elements are missing.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeKey Action Statements & Body of Evidence The student: 1)Provides each of the CPG’s “Key Action” or “Guideline Statements” up to a maximum of 5 relevant recommendations, 2) Provides the body of evidence strength for each, and 3) If the statement has applicability to other groups, only discuss the relevant primary care ones (3 critical elements).

45.0 pts

Exceptional- Student presents a maximum of 5 relevant recommendations AND Student denotes the evidence strength for EACH recommendation AND Student discusses ONLY the ones applicable to primary care

39.0 pts

Exceeds- All three (3) critical elements are addressed but some information may be only partially addressed, or not completely accurate

37.0 pts

Meets- One (1) critical element is missing.

18.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Two (2) critical elements are missing.

0.0 pts

Developing- All three (3) critical elements are missing

45.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication in Clinical 1) Using an example of a patient from their clinical rotation with the same condition, 2) Student discusses how the diagnosis and treatment of their patient compared to the recommendations given in the guidelines, and 3). Specific examples of what was done well or what could have been done better is noted (3 critical elements).

45.0 pts

Exceptional- The student uses a patient example from their clinical setting with the same condition AND The student discusses how the diagnosis & treatment of their patient compared to those recommended in the guideline AND Specific examples are given on what was done well or what could have been done better

39.0 pts

Exceeds- All three (3) critical elements are addressed but some information may only be partially addressed

37.0 pts

Meets- One (1) critical element is missing.

18.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Two (2) critical elements are missing.

0.0 pts

Developing- All three (3) critical elements are missing

45.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation 1) The student used PowerPoint and Kaltura and presentation was professional in quality, 2) Slides were well organized and aesthetically pleasing, 3) Student’s narration was understandable and well-paced, 4) References were noted, 5) Presentation was under 15min in length. (5 critical elements).

15.0 pts

Exceptional- Student uses Power Point and Kaltura which demonstrates a professional quality AND Student’s slides were well organized AND Student’s narration was understandable and well-paced AND References were noted AND Presentation was <15 minutes

13.0 pts

Exceeds- Two (2) critical elements were missing.

12.0 pts

Meets- Three (3) critical elements were missing.

6.0 pts

Needs Improvement-Four (4) critical elements were missing.

0.0 pts

Developing- Five (5) critical elements were missing

15.0 pts

Total Points: 150.0