Religion discussion due tonight
'Now It's a Sign of Protest:' Muslim Women in Denmark Defy the Face Veil Ban
By KARIS HUSTAD/COPENHAGEN August 2, 2018
Sabina started wearing the niqab two years ago as a way to feel more connected
to God. The face veil—a piece of fabric tied around the back of her head that
only reveals her eyes—is a reminder of her identity and beliefs, she says. “I
found it very beautiful,” the 21-year-old education student explains, sitting
cross-legged on the floor of the women’s prayer room in Det Islamiske
Trossamfund, a mosque in Copenhagen. “In the beginning it was a very
spiritual choice.”
But starting this month when she wears her niqab in public, her act of devotion
will also be an act of civil disobedience. She will be one of the Danish citizens
defying the country’s ban on face coverings in all public places, which came
into effect on Wednesday.
“Now it has also become a political choice for me,” says Sabina, who asked
TIME not to disclose her last name out of concerns for her safety. “It is also a
sign of protest.”
Sabina is a founder of Kvinder i Dialog (Women in Dialogue), an organization
started by niqabis—women who wear the veil—that brings Muslim women
affected by the ban into conversation with the larger Danish population
through events, social media and public appearances. Their goal has been to
dispel what they say are misconceptions about their choice to wear the veil:
that niqabis are forced to wear the garment, don’t go to school or work, and are
radicalized and pose a threat.
Now their aims have expanded to include standing their ground in Danish
society. On the first day of the ban, the women led a public protest over their
right to wear the veil. Hundreds of people of different religious and ethnic
backgrounds congregated at Den Sorte Plads in Copenhagen’s Nørrebro
neighborhood, donning niqabs, colorful scarves and flamboyant face coverings
—a horse head, fake beards and lucha libre masks were spotted across the plaza
—to challenge the enforcement of the ban. The crowd marched on local streets
led by a sign that read “My clothes, my choice” and chanted “No racists in our
streets!” as they locked arms around the Bellahøj police station. At the same
time, across the country a protest took place in Aarhus, Denmark’s second
biggest city.
Many in the crowd said taking to the streets seemed to be the only way to bring
attention to the problem. “When I was a kid, no one talked about who you
could be and how you could look and dress,” said Line Schmidt, 33, wearing a
black balaclava with yellow translucent heart-shaped glasses.“It’s not the
Denmark I know.”
To protesters and women who wear the veil, the ban looks like another sign
that Denmark is betraying its long-held value of tolerance. “It’s not just about
us fighting for the right to wear our niqab,” Sabina says. “It’s also about us
fighting for right to live our lives as practicing Muslims in Denmark. We are
saying to the government: we do not accept this form of racist, Islamophobic
and oppressive politics.”
Denmark’s new law, passed May 31 to take effect from August 1, does not
specifically mention the niqab (a veil that covers the face except for the eyes)
or burqa (more conservative headwear that covers the head and body and
includes a mesh screen over the eyes). It is up to police to judge whether a face
covering is in violation of the ban and to instruct the offender to go home.
Fines range from 1,000 krone ($156) up to 10,000 krone ($1,568) for repeat
offenses.
But many of those in support of the ban have been clear that it is meant to
target the Muslim face veil. “We don’t want the burqa and niqab in Denmark,”
Naser Khader, a parliament member with the Conservative People’s Party and a
Muslim who has long supported the ban, tells TIME. He says it’s about the
principle of women not being oppressed, rather than the number of women
who wear the veil. “We want gender equality in Denmark, that’s it. If you want
to go with burqa and niqab, find another place to do it.”
The current number of women who wear the veil in Denmark is unknown, but
the most recent research suggests it is very few. A 2009 study by Margit
Warburg, a professor in sociology of religion at the University of Copenhagen,
indicates less than 0.2% of Muslim women in the country wear the niqab or
burqa—an estimated 150 women out of a country of 5.7 million. “It is really a
very small minority out of a minority out of a minority,” says Warburg.
Human rights groups have slammed arguments like Khader’s. While there
might be some specific instances where the full-face veil ban might be
legitimate in the interests of public safety, Amnesty International argues that
the blanket ban is a violation of women’s rights to freedom of expression and
religion. “If the intention of this law was to protect women’s rights it fails
abjectly. Instead, the law criminalizes women for their choice of clothing—
making a mockery of the freedoms Denmark purports to uphold.”
A Continent-Wide Debate
Denmark follows France, Belgium and Austria with full bans on face coverings
(Bulgaria, the Netherlands, Germany and other regions and cities across Europe
have partial bans based on geographical area or type of space). In 2014 the
European Court of Human Rights upheld France’s 2011 law, accepting that
social cohesion was a valid argument for the ban, even though fewer than 2,000
women reportedly wore the veil in 2011, out of nearly 5 million Muslims in
France.
But enforcement and effectiveness of the ban have been mixed. In Austria,
which implemented a similar law in October 2017, police fined people with
scarves and a man in a shark costume because of confusion over the vague
wording of the law. France, the first European country to introduce such a ban,
has consistently enforced the law—but surveys indicate niqabis continue to
wear the veil but spend more time indoors (though there is little research on
women who wear the veil after the ban).
“It divides society,” says Sara Silvestri, professor of religion and politics at
City, University of London, and an expert on Islam in Europe. “It either
withdraws women into the closely-knit community or empowers them to fight
back and become even more religious and even more proud to wear the veil.”
In Denmark both the center-right government and center-left Social Democrat
party voted in favor of the ban, passing the law 75-30. At the heart of the
government’s argument were concerns over the subjugation of women and a
need to enforce Danish culture and values.“We must be able to see each other
and we must also be able to see each other’s facial expressions,” Justice
Minister Søren Pape Poulsen said when the ban was passed in May. “It’s a value
in Denmark.” A significant portion of the Danish population favored the ban:
62% supported a ban on the niqab and burqa according to an opinion poll from
last September.
Read more: Denmark’s “ghetto” policies are an ominous sign that liberal
Europe is starting to unravel at the seams
Denmark is still a homogeneous country: 87.6% of the country’s population is
ethnically Danish and 75% of the population is Protestant (based off
membership in the state-funded National Church). In recent decades, the
country has struggled to integrate immigrants and their new cultures. This year
alone, significant debate has raged over policies that seem to target minorities.
For example, the country has weighed a citizens’ proposal to outlaw
circumcision (mainly practiced by the country’s Jews and Muslims) and the
immigration minister suggested Muslims do not work during Ramadan because
they pose a safety hazard. And more concretely, the government passed a series
of laws to eradicate “ghettos,” neighborhoods with social problems where more
than 50% of residents are non-Western immigrants.
“The parliament decides what it means to be Danish,” says Garbi Schmidt, a
Roskilde University professor who studies migration and cultural encounters.
“Right now, it is Muslims that fall out and minorities that fall out [of that
definition]. But it is also problematic for society—how xenophobic should it be
when it comes to ethnic, religious and all kinds of diversity? Who has the right
to live as a Dane?”
Fighting for the Right to Wear the Veil
Asserting the right to live as a Dane while wearing the niqab has been the goal
of Kvinder i Dialog since it officially launched in January. The group, which has
grown to approximately 60 niqabis and allies, has hosted open houses, stood
on the street handing out flyers, visited high school classrooms and
participated in debates on the issue, all in the hopes of trying to help their
fellow citizens understand their choice. “We were saying to everyone, just ask
us whatever you like,” Sabina says. “Let’s talk about it.”
By becoming more visible, Kvinder i Dialog has been able to change some
minds. “If you are forced to wear it, I would not understand why you are
fighting so much for it,” Sabina recalls a woman telling her at an open house.
But it hasn’t always worked. Politicians have refused to take their meetings and
they’ve received hateful responses on their social media posts.
Part of the problem is that many Danes have never seen, let alone met or talked
to, a woman who wears the niqab, Sabina says. That fueled misconceptions
about the background and motivations of the niqabis. Half of the women that
Warburg found in her 2009 study were ethnic Danes, for example, as recent
converts tend to be more devout in their religious expression. Further, women
wear the niqab as a way to challenge and deepen their faith, Warburg says. She
did not find evidence that there were women being forced to wear the veil in
Denmark.
Women who choose the niqab say oppression has not come from the veil itself,
but from Denmark’s opposition to it. Sarah, a gregarious 30-year-old student,
mother of three and another founder of Kvinder i Dialog, said it was already
difficult to wear her face covering in public. Once a man threatened to kill her
at a train station in front of her then 3-year-old son.
Despite this, Sarah, who was born in Denmark to a Muslim family and speaks
Danish as her first language, grew up believing that the country’s tradition of
tolerance would protect her religious choices and allow her to follow her
dreams of studying engineering and starting her own business. Now Sarah—
who asked TIME to only use her first name to protect her privacy—is
considering switching to e-learning to finish her courses, and her husband has
agreed to take full responsibility of picking up their children from school and
running errands.
“If I want to go somewhere, I really have to think about it—is it worth getting a
fine?” she says, bouncing her curly-haired 7-month-old daughter on her lap
during a preparation workshop for the protest on Wednesday. “I have never felt
like a victim before. This is the first time I’ve felt oppressed.”
Still, she sees the veil as a source of power as she begins life after the ban. “You
have to be very strong to wear the niqab in Denmark,” Sarah says. “We are not
going to lie down and let people kick us. We are going to fight to the end.”