Org Strategy Week 7 DQR

2/13/22, 10:02 AM Multiweek Discussion Rubric - MBA-540-X3553 Org Strategy in Global Env 22TW3

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/content/948990/viewContent/16870891/View 1/3

Multiweek Discussion Rubric

Overview

Your ac�ve par�cipa�on in the discussions is essen�al to your overall success this term. Discussion ques�ons will help you make

meaningful connec�ons between the course content and the larger concepts of the course. Conducted over a two-week �me

period, these discussions give you a chance to express your own thoughts, ask ques�ons, and gain insight from your peers and

instructor. Mul�week discussions allow for more flexibility around submission due dates compared to tradi�onal discussions and

encourage a deeper evolu�on of conversa�on around specific course concepts.

Direc�ons

For each discussion, you must create one ini�al post and follow up with at least two response posts.

For your ini�al post, do the following:

Write a post of 1 to 2 paragraphs.

In the first week one of this mul�week discussion, complete your ini�al post by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. of your local �me

zone.

Consider content from other parts of the course where appropriate. Use proper cita�on methods for your discipline when

referencing scholarly or popular sources.

For your response posts, do the following:

Reply to at least two classmates outside of your own ini�al post thread.

In the second week of this mul�week discussion, complete your two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. of your local

�me zone.

When responding to at least two of your peers’ pos�ngs, your responses should show that you have given thought to what

the original post said. They should also push the conversa�on forward, offering insights or asking clarifying ques�ons if

necessary.

Consider the following ques�ons:

Does your response push the conversa�on forward?

Does your response offer your perspec�ve?

What about your peers’ stories can you relate to?

What can you learn from your peers’ stories?

Are your responses clear?

Have you considered the viewpoints or insights of the original posts?

Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Value

Comprehension Develops an ini�al

post with an

organized, clear

point of view or idea

using rich and

Develops an ini�al

post with a point of

view or idea using

appropriate detail

(90%)

Develops an ini�al

post with a point of

view or idea but with

some gaps in

organiza�on and

( )

Does not develop an

ini�al post with an

organized point of

view or idea (0%)

20

Mul�week Discussion Rubric



MBA-540-X3553 Org Strategy in Global Env 22TW3 TM

2/13/22, 10:02 AM Multiweek Discussion Rubric - MBA-540-X3553 Org Strategy in Global Env 22TW3

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/content/948990/viewContent/16870891/View 2/3

significant detail

(100%)

detail (70%)

Timeliness N/A Submits ini�al post

on �me (100%)

Submits ini�al post

one day late (70%)

Submits ini�al post

two or more days

late (0%)

10

Evolu�on of

Discussion

Adds insigh�ul,

meaningful, and

specific feedback

that takes the

relevant concepts to

a deeper level;

examines

assump�ons made

as a reader and calls

them out so they

can be addressed

(100%)

Adds substan�ally to

the discussion by

providing meaningful

and specific

feedback that probes

beyond the

superficial and

invites looking

deeper at the

subject; may include

asking the “why”

behind the “why”

(90%)

Adds to discussion

by providing specific

feedback, but some

of the feedback may

not promote deeper

thinking about the

subject (70%)

Does not provide

feedback that takes

the discussion to the

next level (0%)

20

Cri�cal Thinking Draws insigh�ul

conclusions that are

thoroughly defended

with evidence and

examples (100%)

Draws informed

conclusions that are

jus�fied with

evidence (90%)

Draws logical

conclusions (70%)

Does not draw

logical conclusions

(0%)

30

Wri�ng

(Mechanics)

Ini�al post and

responses are easily

understood, clear,

and concise using

proper cita�on

methods where

applicable with no

errors in cita�ons

(100%)

Ini�al post and

responses are easily

understood using

proper cita�on

methods where

applicable with few

errors in cita�ons

(90%)

Ini�al post and

responses are

understandable

using proper cita�on

methods where

applicable with a

number of errors in

cita�ons (70%)

Ini�al post and

responses are not

understandable and

do not use proper

cita�on methods

where applicable

(0%)

20

Total 100%

2/13/22, 10:02 AM Multiweek Discussion Rubric - MBA-540-X3553 Org Strategy in Global Env 22TW3

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/content/948990/viewContent/16870891/View 3/3

Reflect in ePortfolio Download Print

Open with docReader

You have viewed this topic

Last Visited Feb 8, 2022 10:05 PM

Activity Details