Module 2: Community Program Design (((Human Trafficking))

profilephaynes
MSW517Module2SYLLABUSCommunityProgramDesign.docx
Home>Social Science homework help>Sociology homework help>Module 2: Community Program Design (((Human Trafficking))

Module 2: Community Program Design

Course Objectives

· CO1: Describe mental health needs in the developing world and demonstrate effective interventions on individual, family, group, community, and organizational levels.

· CO2: Analyze sociopolitical barriers and design macro solutions to scaling up of mental health treatment in the developing world.

Guidelines

Review the readings for Modules 1 and 2. Choose one psychosocial problem –

1) Human trafficking conduct a literature review. .

2) Focus on one country or region (e.g., sub-Saharan Africa,) so that your recommendations are culture-specific.

**3) Describe the prevalence and causes of the problem in general and, if available, in your country or region of choice. Describe also the costs of the problem to the individuals and to the society in which it occurs, and which of these costs you hope to address through your program.

4. Design an intervention program that is culturally appropriate , strengths-based, and empowering for the community. **Include at least two of the following ecological levels: Individual, family/group, community, and organization.

5. For the community level, apply concepts of community development to create a sustained response to the problem.

6.Complete your assignment by discussing how you will monitor and evaluate outcomes for all program goals.

Grading Criteria

Your paper will be graded based on following criteria:

Criteria

Points

Description

Literature Review

30

· Articulates the prevalence of the problem in the region chosen, the individual and societal costs of the problem, and the determinants of the problem. 

· Argues for the need for intervention of the type you have designed.

Intervention Program: Level 1

Individual

30

· Describes the goals, methods, and steps or stages of the intervention at the chosen ecological level, as well as what training and supervision are needed.

· Provides empirical support for choices of intervention.

Intervention Program: Level 2

Community

30

· Describes the goals, methods, and steps or stages of the intervention at the chosen ecological level, as well as what training and supervision are needed.

· Provides empirical support for choices of intervention.

Organizational Needs

15

Analyzes the organizational policies, resources, and stakeholder cooperation necessary to implement and sustain the program.

Program Monitoring and Evaluation

15

Appropriate, culturally unbiased measures are used to monitor and evaluate program outcomes, including quantitative and qualitative assessment.

Clarity of Writing

20

Communicates information using clear and concise language with no errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.

APA Style

10

All sources are credited using APA formatting, and paper is formatted according to APA guidelines with proper title page, headings, and reference page.

Total

 150

A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Literature Review

30 pts

Highest Level of performance

Articulates fully all three: the prevalence of the problem in the region chosen, the individual and societal costs of the problem, and the determinants of the problem. Argues with abundant evidence for the need for intervention of the type you have designed.

26 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Articulates adequately all three: the prevalence of the problem in the region chosen, the individual and societal costs of the problem, and the determinants of the problem. Argues with adequate evidence for the need for intervention of the type you have designed.

23 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Articulates adequately two of three: the prevalence of the problem in the region chosen, the individual and societal costs of the problem, and the determinants of the problem. Argues with minimal evidence for the need for intervention of the type you have designed.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Articulates adequately one or fewer: the prevalence of the problem in the region chosen, the individual and societal costs of the problem, and the determinants of the problem. Does not argue for the need for intervention of the type you have designed.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Intervention Level 1

30 pts

Highest Level of performance

Describes with consistent detail the goals, methods, and steps or stages of the intervention at the chosen ecological level, as well as what training and supervision are needed. Provides abundant empirical support for choices of intervention.

26 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Describes with mostly consistent detail the goals, methods, and steps or stages of the intervention at the chosen ecological level, as well as what training and supervision are needed. Provides adequate empirical support for choices of intervention.

23 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Describes with somewhat consistent detail the goals, methods, and steps or stages of the intervention at the chosen ecological level, as well as what training and supervision are needed. Provides inadequate empirical support for choices of intervention.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Describes with little or no detail the goals, methods, and steps or stages of the intervention at the chosen ecological level, as well as what training and supervision are needed. Provides minimal or no empirical support for choices of intervention.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Intervention Level 2

30 pts

Highest Level of performance

Describes with consistent detail the goals, methods, and steps or stages of the intervention at the chosen ecological level, as well as what training and supervision are needed. Provides abundant empirical support for choices of intervention.

26 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Describes with mostly consistent detail the goals, methods, and steps or stages of the intervention at the chosen ecological level, as well as what training and supervision are needed. Provides adequate empirical support for choices of intervention.

23 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Describes with somewhat consistent detail the goals, methods, and steps or stages of the intervention at the chosen ecological level, as well as what training and supervision are needed. Provides inadequate empirical support for choices of intervention.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Describes with little or no detail the goals, methods, and steps or stages of the intervention at the chosen ecological level, as well as what training and supervision are needed. Provides minimal or no empirical support for choices of intervention.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Organizational Needs

15 pts

Highest Level of performance

Analyzes with consistent detail the organizational policies, resources, and stakeholder cooperation necessary to implement and sustain the program.

13 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Analyzes with mostly consistent detail the organizational policies, resources, and stakeholder cooperation necessary to implement and sustain the program.

11 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Analyzes with somewhat consistent detail the organizational policies, resources, and stakeholder cooperation necessary to implement and sustain the program.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Analyzes with little or no detail the organizational policies, resources, and stakeholder cooperation necessary to implement and sustain the program.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Program Monitoring and Evaluation

15 pts

Highest Level of performance

Appropriate, culturally unbiased measures are used to monitor and evaluate program outcomes, including quantitative and qualitative assessment.

13 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Mostly appropriate, culturally unbiased measures are used to monitor and evaluate program outcomes, including quantitative and qualitative assessment.

11 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Somewhat appropriate, culturally unbiased measures are used to monitor and evaluate program outcomes, including either quantitative or qualitative assessment.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Inappropriate or culturally biased measures are used to monitor and evaluate program outcomes, including either quantitative or qualitative assessment.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Clarity of Writing

20 pts

Highest Level of performance

Communicates information using consistently clear and concise language with no errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation. Paper is logically organized with introduction, transitions, and conclusion

17 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Communicates information using mostly consistently clear and concise language with few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation. Paper is mostly logically organized with introduction, transitions, and conclusion.

15 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Communicates information using somewhat consistently clear and concise language with some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation. Paper is somewhat logically organized with introduction, transitions, and conclusion.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Communicates information using unclear and/or inconcise language with frequent errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation. Paper is not logically organized with introduction, transitions, and conclusion.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

APA Style

10 pts

Highest Level of performance

All sources are credited using APA formatting, and paper is formatted according to APA guidelines with proper title page, headings, and reference page.

9 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

All sources are credited using APA formatting, and paper is formatted according to APA guidelines with proper title page, headings, and reference page.

8 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

All sources are credited using APA formatting, and paper is formatted according to APA guidelines with proper title page, headings, and reference page.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

All sources are credited using APA formatting, and paper is formatted according to APA guidelines with proper title page, headings, and reference page.

10 pts