MSW 513 (Module 5) Assignment Evaluating Social Policies
|
Table 2. Policy Analysis Table |
||||
|
Criteria |
Public Health Impact |
Feasibility |
Economic and Budgetary Impact |
|
|
Scoring Definitions |
Low: small reach, effect size, and impact on disparate populations Medium: small reach with large effect size or large reach with small effect size High: large reach, effect size, and impact on disparate populations |
Low: No/small likelihood of being enacted Medium: Moderate likelihood of being enacted High : High likelihood of being enacted |
Less favorable: High costs to implement Favorable: Moderate costs to implement More favorable: Low costs to implement |
Less favorable: costs are high relative to benefits Favorable: costs are moderate relative to benefits (benefits justify costs) More favorable: costs are low relative to benefits |
|
Policy 1
|
· Low · Medium · High
Concerns about the amount or quality of data? (Yes / No) |
· Low · Medium · High
Concerns about the amount or quality of data? (Yes / No) |
Budget · Less favorable · Favorable · More favorable
Concerns about the amount or quality of data? (Yes / No) |
Economic · Less favorable · Favorable · More favorable
Concerns about the amount or quality of data? (Yes / No) |
|
Policy 2 |
· Low · Medium · High
Concerns about the amount or quality of data? (Yes / No) |
· Low · Medium · High
Concerns about the amount or quality of data? (Yes / No) |
· Less favorable · Favorable · More favorable
Concerns about the amount or quality of data? (Yes / No) |
· Less favorable · Favorable · More favorable
Concerns about the amount or quality of data? (Yes / No) |
|
Policy 3 |
· Low · Medium · High
Concerns about the amount or quality of data? (Yes / No) |
· Low · Medium · High
Concerns about the amount or quality of data? (Yes / No) |
· Less favorable · Favorable · More favorable
Concerns about the amount or quality of data? (Yes / No) |
· Less favorable · Favorable · More favorable
Concerns about the amount or quality of data? (Yes / No) |
NOTE: Scoring is subjective and this table is intended to be used as an organizational guide.