MSW 513 Module 3 Editorial Assignment: Controversial Social Issues

profilephaynes
MSW513Module3EditorialAssignmentControversialSocialIssues.docx

Module 3 Editorial Assignment: Controversial Social Issues - RACIAL INJUSTICE)

Purpose

The purpose of this editorial assignment is to have students articulate their understanding of how social media is used to support or oppose controversial social issues for a vulnerable population.

Students will use social media platforms to locate a strongly worded article or blog with a very specific viewpoint. The students will use recent research evidence, facts, and relevant statistics to identify elements of fake news, misinformation, alternative facts, and disinformation campaigns.

Course Outcome

CO 3: Analyze the impact of social media on public perception regarding social policies, advancement of human rights, social, economic, and environmental justice.

CO 4: Assess the integrity and authenticity of the information promoted by various social media outlets.

Requirements

1. This assignment is worth 100 points . It will be graded on the citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric.

2. Create your exercise using Microsoft Word.

3. Follow the directions and grading criteria closely. Any questions about your assignment may be posted under the Q & A Forum.

4. The length of the exercise is to be no less than 750 words , excluding the title page and reference pages.

5. APA format is required with both a title and reference page. Use the necessary components of the review as Level 1 headings (upper and lower case, centered, boldface):

Criteria for the Content (Guidelines)

Write a 750-word Editorial addressing the following elements:

1. Select a controversial contemporary socio-political issue.

2. Locate a passionate social media post (i.e., Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, and blogs), focused on the controversial social-political issue. The post must be recent, no more than one month old.

3. Critically analyze the social media post and identify any information that may not be factual and not grounded in research evidence from credible sources.

4. Select a credible newspaper or magazine outlet and write a 750 word (Count does not include reference text) editorial counter argument to the post. The editorial should present your viewpoint (advocate or opposer) on the controversial social issue. Please note that you must take a position in your editorial. You cannot argue a "middle of the road" approach that supports both an advocate and opposer positions.

5. Your editorial must be written in the following format:

a. A short one sentence headliner, that succinctly describes the editorial content.

b. An introduction paragraph briefly summarizing the social media post's viewpoint on the controversial socio-political issue. This paragraph should briefly introduce your viewpoint and state your position.

c. 2-3 paragraphs clearly articulating a well-constructed argument, substantiated by research evidence, facts and relevant statistics to support your position. The editorial must present a counterargument, refuting any disinformation or misinformation you credibly identify as propaganda presented in the social media post . The editorial must use relevant quotes from your research to support or refute the arguments presented in the newspaper article.

d. The editorial must include a conclusion paragraph that identifies social policies meant to combat the social issues. The policies discussed can be helpful or harmful.

See the detailed directions and grading criteria in the table below.

Directions and Grading Criteria

Category

Points

Description

Controversial Social Issue

25

· Select a contemporary controversial social issue. Locate an impassioned social media post, focused on the controversial social-political issue.

Evidence-Based Argument

25

· Write an evidence-based 750-word newspaper editorial advocating or opposing the content in the social media post. Use

Social Policy

20

· Identify and describe social policies intended to combat the social issue.

Clarity of Writing

15

· Use of standard English grammar and sentence structure. No spelling errors or typographical errors.

APA Style

15

· All information taken from another source, even if summarized, must be appropriately cited in problem Statement and listed in the references using APA format:

· Document Set up

· Title and reference pages

· Citations in the text and references

Total

100

A quality essay will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

Rubric

Editorial Assignment: Controversial Social Issues

Editorial Assignment: Controversial Social Issues

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Identify a Contemporary Controversial Social Issue and Locate Social Media Article or Blog

25 pts

Highest Level of performance

Identifies a controversial contemporary social issue and located a social media article or blog that passionately discusses the issue from a clearly biased viewpoint.

20 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Identifies a controversial contemporary social issue and located a good social media article or blog that provided a discussion from one viewpoint.

10 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Identifies a controversial contemporary social issue and located a social media article or blog that provided a generic overview of the social issue.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Fails to identify a controversial social issue, and/or fails to locate a social media article or post that discusses the social issue from one viewpoint.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Articulate an Evidence-Based Argument Supporting or Refuting Article or Blog Viewpoint

25 pts

Highest Level of performance

Clearly articulates a well-constructed argument, that is thoroughly substantiated by research evidence, facts, relevant quotes and statistics to support or refute main arguments.

20 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Articulates a good argument, that is substantiated by research evidence, facts, relevant quotes and statistics to support or refute arguments.

10 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Presented an adequate argument, that was substantiated with some research evidence, facts, relevant quotes and statistics to provide basic support for arguments.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Fails to provide a logical argument that is substantiated by research evidence, facts, relevant quotes and statistics to support or refute arguments.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Identify and Describe Social Policy

20 pts

Highest Level of performance

Identifies and comprehensively describes social policies that combat or exasperate the contemporary controversial social issues; Uses research evidence to corroborate statements about the relevancy or irrelevancy of the social policy.

15 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Identifies and provides a good description of social policies that combat or exasperate the contemporary controversial social issues; Uses research evidence to provide support for statements about the relevancy or irrelevancy of the social policy.

10 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Identifies and provides a basic overview of social policies that combat or exasperate a contemporary controversial social issue; Uses some research evidence to provide minimal support for statements about the relevancy or irrelevancy of the social policy.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Fails to identify and describe social policies related to the contemporary controversial social issue; Fails to provide relevant research evidence to support statements.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Clarity of Writing

15 pts

Highest Level of performance

Excellent use of standard English showing original thought. No spelling or grammar errors. Well organized with proper flow of meaning.

10 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Some evidence of own expression and competent use of language. No more than three spelling or grammar errors. Well organized thoughts and concepts.

5 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Language needs development. Four or more spelling and/or grammar errors. Poorly organized thoughts and concepts.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Language needs significant development. Five or more spelling and/or grammar errors; fails to have organized thoughts and concepts.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

APA Style

15 pts

Highest Level of performance

APA format correct with no errors.

10 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

APA format is mostly correct, with no more than 1 to 2 minor errors.

5 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

APA formatting contains multiple errors and/or several citations are missing.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

APA formatting not present and citations are not included.

15 pts