|
Identification
(20%)
|
· Thorough identification of the importance of the subject matter to the individual, clinical, and professional.
· Supports discussion concepts through personal experience and evidence-based information.
· Submits a minimum of three posts, one initial and two responses to either the course faculty or peers, with thorough reflection and content.
|
· Reflection of subject to self, clinical, and professional importance with minimal integration of evidence-based information.
· Submits two or more posts with some reflection and content.
|
· Minimal reflection without reference to personal, clinical, or profession.
· Submits one or more posts that have minimal reflection or content.
|
No Posts
|
|
Reflection/Participation/Knowledge
(60%)
|
· Provides a well-written reflection that is clearly connected to the outcomes and clinical insight.
· Responds to at least two other student postings with a response that advances the discussion.
· Clear critical thinking acknowledges application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation.
· Replies move the conversation forward. Makes a reply to a question asked in response to their own posting.
· Builds a focused argument.
· Asks new or related questions.
· Makes an oppositional or congruent statement that is supported by experience or research.
|
· Provides a well-written reflection and there is a clear connection to outcomes, but lacks clinical insight.
· Replies partially move the conversation forward. Makes a reply to question asked in response to their own posting.
· Some clear critical thinking acknowledges application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation.
· Affirms statements or references to relevant research.
· Asks similar or related questions within the context of the conversation.
|
· Provides short reflection and there is a slight connection to outcomes.
· Student does not move the conversation forward within their own post or in their response to peer/faculty.
· Minimal critical thinking that acknowledges application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation.
· Does not affirm or oppose statements in conversation.
· Does not pose or ask related question in the context of DB conversation.
|
No Posts
|
|
Format/Style/APA/ Citations
(20%)
|
· No grammar, word usage, or punctuation errors. Overall style is consistent with professional work.
· Writing style facilitates communication.
· Provides three references that are relevant to the content and published within the last five years.
|
· Fewer than three grammatical errors.
· Provides less than three references that are relevant to the content and published within the last five years.
· Writing style facilitates some communication.
|
· More than three grammatical errors.
· Provides less than three references that are relevant to the content and published within the last five years.
· Writing style does not facilitate communication.
|
No Posts
|
aq24
MSN_Discussion_Rubric_20PTS.docx
0
