Final Paper
MSL 630
Leading Productive Teams
Belhaven University
Unit 6
Networks
Virtual Teams
Dysfunction of a Team
Tangible Gifts
1
In Unit Six, the Course Level Competencies are:
Objective 1.2: Articulate and evaluate effectiveness of
leadership practices in motivating others.
Objective 2.1: Define and identify components of best practices
of productive teams.
Objective 3.2: Identify key components in developing
appreciation in the workplace.
Objective 4.2: Apply methods for identifying perceptions,
emotions, and non-verbal communication in the workplace.
Objective 5.1: Demonstrate professional conduct in oral
communication, written communication, and punctuality.
Objective 5.2: Identify Christian perspectives as they relate to
the course.
2
Objectives
MSL 630
Leading Productive Teams
Belhaven University
Unit 6.1
Teamwork
External Roles
Networks
Social Capital
3
In-n-Out Burgers, CA
Teamwork
Teamwork and taskwork are related, but they are not the
same thing.
• Taskwork - involves members’ interactions with
tasks, tools, machines, and systems to
accomplish a team’s mission.
• Teamwork – the process by which team
members interact with and relate to one another.
• A strong taskwork tie indicates that two members
of a team share many tasks and tools together.
Taskwork and Teamwork
At least three factors affect the taskwork-teamwork
network structure:
• Closure – how interconnected the team members
are.
• Centralization – refers to the extent to which most of
the interaction is centered around one or a few core
team members.
• Specialization – refers to the degree to which team
members have unique knowledge and expertise.
Factors that Affect Network Structures
Taskwork and Teamwork, cont.
Identifying and understanding the roles that team
members play vis-à-vis the flow of information in and out
of the team is an important predictor of team productivity
and performance.
Often, roles are not formally assigned but instead are
taken on by team members through a team negotiation
process.
External Roles of Team Members
A listing of the most common and important roles
observed in real workgroups:
• Boundary spanner
• Bufferer
• Interpreter
• Advisor
• Gatekeeper
• Lobbyist
• Negotiator or Mediator
• Spokesperson
• Strategist
• Coordinator
External Roles of Team Members,
cont.
Despite the benefits of boundary spanning for teams,
boundary spanning can be stressful and challenging,
requiring significant effort and time.
Role overload occurs when a person has too much
work in the time available.
External Roles of Team Members,
cont.
Boundary Loosening vs. Boundary Tightening
• Boundary loosening activities are activities that
focus team members outside the team and
organization.
• Boundary tightening activities are activities that
focus team members inward on the team and
organization.
Organizational Networks
Sharing Knowledge
• In an ideal organizational environment, there is
clear and consistent knowledge-sharing among
the different functional and geographic units.
• Knowledge-sharing quickly disperses innovation,
reduces unnecessary duplication of effort, and
facilitates the implementation of best practices.
Organizational Networks, cont.
Insider vs. Outsider Knowledge Valuation
• The source of the knowledge makes a big difference in
whether team members feel threatened or intrigued by
information.
• People are more likely to value knowledge that comes
from an external network source and devalue knowledge
that comes from an internal member of the team.
Organizational Networks, cont.
Human Capital and Social Capital
• Human capital - The organizational value that
intelligent, educated, and experienced people bring to
their organization.
• Social capital - The value people add to their team
and organization through their ties to other people.
• While human capital refers to individual ability,
social capital refers to opportunities created
through relationships.
Organizational Networks, cont.
• Clique network - close-knit, self-contained network
with redundant communication structures.
Human Capital and Social Capital
Informal systems of connections and relationships between
people develop over time, and guide the flow of information
between people and teams.
• Perceived network – people who have an astute
knowledge of network links and have a good assessment
of what people and coalitions are powerful in an
organization.
Organizational Networks, cont.
Team Social Capital
Team social capital is the configuration of team
members’ social relationships within two categories:
• Social relationships within a group.
• Social relationships in the structure of the broader
organization.
Organizational Networks, cont.
Team Social Capital
• Some teams have greater social capital “liquidity”
because their members have positions in the overall
social structure of the organization.
• The optimal configuration of work-related social ties
was a moderate level of internal closure within the
group and a large number of “bridging” relationships
to other groups’ leaders.
Organizational Networks, cont.
People in teams bond along three specific types of ties:
• Friendship ties – close, interpersonal ties
between people, characterized by positive, amicable
relationships.
• Trust ties – involve both an affective (social exchange)
and a cognitive (reliability) relationship perspective.
• Advice ties – represent instrumental rather than
expressive relationships and represent the exchange of
expertise and information necessary to complete one’s
task.
Friendship, Trust, and Advice Ties
Organizational Networks, cont.
Personality and education affect network relationships.
Advice, friendship, and trust ties are mutually exclusive.
Four interplaying characteristics determine the extent to
which negative relationships hurt team and
organizational effectiveness:
• Relationship strength
• Reciprocity
• Cognition
• Social distance
Friendship, Trust, and Advice Ties
Organizational Networks, cont.
Strategic network expansion involves connecting to
people and teams in such a way that the person is filling
a structural hole.
To see the difference between typical network
expansion versus strategic network expansion.
From the point of view of the employee, organizational
benefits are maximized in a large network of
nonredundant contacts – in short, it is better to know a
lot of people who don’t know one another.
Increasing Your Social Capital
Consider the following strategies and steps for individuals,
teams, and organizations to build more connections across
functional groups:
• Analyze your social network
• Identify “structural holes” in your organization.
• Expand the size of the network.
• Diversify networks
• Build hierarchical networks.
• Recognize gender scripts in networks.
• Reputation management.
Increasing Your Social Capital, cont.
Unit 6.1 Recap
Ending 6.1 and getting into 6.2
Social Interaction
Virtual Teams
MSL630
Leading Productive Teams
Belhaven University
Unit 6.2
Social Interaction
Virtual Teams
22
Think about how God uses
you in your networks?
Leading Teams
The Place-Time model considers teams in terms of
their geographic location and temporal relationship.
Richness is the potential information-carrying
capacity of a communications medium.
Face-to-Face communication is relatively “rich” in the
information it conveys because it allows the
simultaneous observation of several cues, including
body language, facial expression, and tone of voice,
and provides people with a greater awareness of
context.
Place-Time Model of Social Interaction
There are four types of communication possibilities in the
Place-Time model of social interaction:
• Face-to-Face communication (FTF)
• Same time, different place
• Different time, same place
• Different place, different time
Place-Time Model of Social Interaction,
cont.
Place-Time Model of Social Interaction,
cont.
Face-to-face communication:
• Crucial in the initiation of relationships and collaboration.
• People are more cooperative when interacting face-to-face.
• Ideal when teams must wrestle with complex problems.
• Without face-to-face contact, work groups form more slowly and
perhaps never fully.
• People rely primarily on nonverbal signals to help them navigate
social interactions.
• Rapport-building through nonverbal signals.
• Not the best modality for all types of teamwork (brainstorming).
Interaction Types and Workplace Effects
Place-Time Model of Social Interaction,
cont.
Same time, different place:
• Loss of informal communication.
• Disconnected feedback.
• Loss of informal modeling.
• Out-of-the-loop employees.
• Advantages: better preparation, reducing micromanagement.
• Edmondson provides four tactics to help people reframe their purpose
on their team.
• People communicate in real time but are not physically in the
same place.
Interaction Types and Workplace Effects
Place-Time Model of Social Interaction,
cont.
Different time, same place:
• Teams in these types of work environments can rely on
the physical environment too much for information and
cues.
• This type of dependence can be a limitation for groups
that find it impossible to work outside the idiosyncratic
confines of their workspace.
• Team members interact asynchronously, but share
the same work space.
Interaction Types and Workplace Effects
Place-Time Model of Social Interaction,
cont.
Different place, different time:
• Lost in translation – communicating via email strips the message
of the paralinguistic and nonverbal cues that enable us to richly
communicate.
• People in this work mode communicate asynchronously
in different places.
• Skim effect -- the tendency for most people to skim email
messages and respond to only one element.
• Egocentrism -- people believe they convey a message in the
correct tone when , in fact, the message is misunderstood.
Place-Time Model of Social Interaction,
cont.
Key things to expect when interactions with a team are via
information technology:
• Reduced status differences: “The weak get strong effect”.
• Equalization of participation.
• Increased time to make decisions.
• Communication frequency decreases and lowers inhibitions.
• Groups make riskier decisions and exhibit greater polarization.
• Social norms change and negative interactions increase.
• Task performance and decision quality – research findings.
• Formation of trust and rapport more difficult.
Information Technology and Social
Behavior
A virtual team is a group of people working together
across time and space using electronic information
technology.
Three factors distinguish virtual, hybrid, and traditional
teams:
• Physical distance
• Technology support
• Percentage of time the group members spent apart.
Virtual, Hybrid, and Traditional Teams
Team formation:
• Location challenges can be overcome more easily than talent
shortages.
Strategies for Enhancing Virtual Teamwork
• Companies should immerse virtual employees in the organization’s
culture.
Technology:
• Key is to not let the technology drive the entire virtual team, rather
technology should support the team.
• A key barrier to effective virtual teamwork is successful user adoption of
new technology.
Enhancing Virtual Teamwork
Strategies for Enhancing Virtual Teamwork
Initial face-to-face experience:
• It is much easier for people to work together if they have initially
met face-to-face.
• Face-to-face contact humanizes people and creates expectations
for team members to use in their long-distance work together.
• Schmoozing (a.k.a. virtual handshake) refers to contact between
people that involves the exchange of some basic personal
information and results in the expedited operation of virtual teams.
Enhancing Virtual Teamwork, cont.
Integrity:
• Four steps a team member can take to demonstrate
their integrity to their virtual team members:
Strategies for Enhancing Virtual Teamwork
– Be truthful and forthright.
– Avoid sarcasm, joking, and teasing.
– Maintain confidences, don’t spread gossip.
– Handle sensitive material properly.
Enhancing Virtual Teamwork, cont.
Unit 6.2 Recap
Ending 6.2 and getting into 6.3
The Five Dysfunctions of a Team
Tangible Gifts
Columbia Mission
MSL630
Leading Productive Teams
Belhaven University
Unit 6.3
The Five Dysfunctions of a Team
Tangible Gifts
Columbia Mission
37
The Five Dysfunctions of a Team
by Patrick Lencioni
Members of teams with an
absence of trust….
• Conceal their weaknesses and
mistakes from one another
• Hesitate to ask for help or
provide constructive feedback
• Jump to conclusions Hesitate to
offer help outside their own areas
of responsibility about the
intentions and aptitudes of others
without attempting to clarify
them
Members of trusting teams...
• Admit weaknesses and mistakes
• Ask for help
• Accept questions and input about
their areas of responsibility
• Give one another the benefit of
the doubt before arriving at a
negative conclusion
• Take risks in offering feedback
and assistance
DYSFUNCTION 1: Absence of Trust
Get to know one another (lunch, activities, etc.)
• Personal histories exercise
• Team effectiveness exercises
• Personality and Behavioral Preferences Profiles
• 360 Degree Feedback Exercises
• Experiential Team Exercises
• Ground Rules
Overcoming Dysfunction 1: Absence of
Trust
Teams that fear conflict…
• Have boring meetings
• Create environments where back-
channel politics and personal attacks
thrive
• Ignore controversial topics that are
critical to team success
• Fail to tap into all the opinions and
perspectives of team members
• Waste time and energy with posturing
and interpersonal risk management
Teams that engage in conflict…
• Have lively, interesting
meetings
• Extract and exploit the ideas of
all team members
• Solve real problems quickly
• Minimize politics
• Put critical topics on the table
for discussion
DYSFUNCTION 2: Fear of Conflict
Mine for conflict, perhaps have even a person designated to
mine for conflict
Give real time permission for conflict—when debate starts
and things get uncomfortable, stop and tell the debaters
how important it is what they are doing
If you are the leader, do not jump in too quickly to protect
As a leader model healthy conflict
Overcoming Dysfunction 2: Fear of
Conflict
A team that fails to commit…
• Creates ambiguity among the
team about direction and priorities
• Watches windows of opportunity
close due to excessive analysis
and unnecessary delay
• Breeds lack of confidence and fear
of failure
• Revisits discussions and decisions
again and again
• Encourages second-guessing
among team members
A team that commits… • Creates clarity around direction
and priorities
• Aligns the entire team around
common objectives
• Develops an ability to learn from
mistakes
• Takes advantage of opportunities
before competitors do
• Moves forward without hesitation
• Changes direction without
hesitation or guilt
DYSFUNCTION 3: Lack of
Commitment
Cascading Messages
Deadlines
Contingency and Worst Case Scenario Planning
Low Risk Exposure Therapy
Create a “FIRST TEAM” mentality at the top
Overcoming Dysfunction 3: Lack of
Commitment
A team that avoids
accountability…
• Creates resentment among
team members who have
different standards of
performance
• Encourages mediocrity
• Misses deadlines and key
deliverables
• Places an undue burden on the
team leader as the sole source
of discipline
A team that holds one another
accountable…
• Ensures that poor performers feel
pressure to improve
• Identifies potential problems quickly
by questioning one another’s
approaches without hesitation
• Establishes respect among team
members who are held to the same
high standards
• Avoids excessive bureaucracy around
performance management and
corrective action
DYSFUNCTION 4: Avoidance of
Accountability
Publication of Goals and Standards
Simple and Regular Progress Reviews
Team Rewards
“Enter the Danger” with one another
Leader must still accept and carry out the role of
final arbiter of discipline
Overcoming Dysfunction 4: Avoidance of
Accountability
A team that is not focused on
results…
• Stagnates/fails to grow
• Rarely defeats competitors
• Loses achievement-oriented
employees
• Encourages team members to
focus on their own careers
and individual goals
• Is easily distracted
A team that focuses on collective
results…
• Retains achievement-oriented
employees
• Minimizes individualistic behavior
• Enjoys success and suffers failure
acutely
• Benefits from individuals who
subjugate their own goals/interest for
the good of the team
• Avoid distractions
DYSFUNCTION 5: Inattention to
Results
Public Declaration of Results
Measurable and Specific, when possible
Results Based Rewards
Leader must value Results and get the Board to
value Results
Leader allows anything else, excuses, gives
permission for everyone to walk away from
results!
Overcoming Dysfunction 5: Inattention
to Results
The Five Languages of
Appreciation in the Workplace By Dr. Gary Chapman & Dr. Paul White
49
Tangible Gifts
The key to an effective gift in the workplace is the “thought,” not the
amount of money spent. Taking time to notice what your colleagues
enjoy (chocolate, coffee, cashews), observing their hobbies and
interests (sports, books, crafts) and buying them a small related gift
shows that you are getting to know them as a person and understand
what is important to them.
Tangible Gifts, cont.
A clique network is closed, dense, and self-
contained; a boundary-spanning network is less
dense, more unique, and more varied.
One advantage of a clique network is high cohesion;
one advantage of a boundary-spanning network is
greater innovation and diversity.
Managers and team members can increase their
social capital by determining the brokers in their
networks, identifying structural holes in their
organization, and diversifying their networks.
51
Recap: Hitting the Highlights
People in teams’ bond along three specific types of
ties: friendship, trust, and advice. Trust-ties involve )
an emotional and cognitive component; advice-ties
involve instrumental relationships.
One method for most effectively increasing a team's
social capital is by expanding the size of that team's
network which does not mean increasing the size of
the team, but rather increasing the number and
diversity of people with whom the team comes into
contact.
52
Recap: Hitting the Highlights, cont.
Managers with more social capital get higher returns
on their human capital because they are in a position
to identify and develop more rewarding opportunities.
People are their most cooperative when
communicating face-to-face.
Face-to-face meeting with clients is a communication
situations that has the highest message "richness," or
potential information-carrying capacity.
Recap: Hitting the Highlights, cont.
People primarily rely on nonverbal signals to help
them conduct social interaction. One estimate is 93%
of the meaning of messages is contained in the
nonverbal part of communication.
Face-to-face interaction allows people to have the
feeling of being "in sync" with another person. The
degree of rapport between people determines the
efficiency and the quality of progress toward goal
achievement, and whether the goal is ever achieved.
Recap: Hitting the Highlights, cont.
Geographically distributed teams experience more
relationship and task conflict than do co-located
teams.
An investigation of performance appraisals revealed
that people receiving feedback were most negative
about electronic feedback versus feedback received
on paper or via face-to-face.
Recap: Hitting the Highlights, cont.
Recap, cont.
Week Six is the
Columbia Mission.
Complete reading assignments Read Chapter 6 “The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the
Workplace”
Read The Five Dysfunctions of Teams
Read 2 Corinthians 9:10-14
Review all web links provided
Complete writing assignments Discuss dysfunctions at your workplace.
Answer discussion questions
Complete unit quiz
57
What’s Next?
Chapman, G. D., & White, P. E. (2012). The 5 languages of appreciation in the
workplace: Empowering organizations by encouraging people.
Chicago: Northfield Pub.
Lencioni, P. M. (2002). The five dysfunctions of a team: a leadership fable(1st
ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Lencioni, P. M. (2003, Summer). The trouble with teamwork. Leader to Leader,
(29), 35-40.
Thompson, L. L. (2016). Making the team: a guide for managers (5th ed.). NY,
NY: Pearson.
Weinberg, R. S. & Gould, D. (2012). Foundations of sport and exercise
psychology (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
58
References
Image References
Hamburger photo [Digital image]. Retrieved from
https://denver.eater.com/2017/11/30/16720732/in-n-out-burger-
colorado-springs-Denver
Harvard Business Publishing Education. (2018). Retrieved from
https://hbsp.harvard.edu/library
Garrett, E. [Digital images].
Google Images (2018). Retrieved from
https://images.google.com/
Lencioni, P. M. (2003, Summer). The trouble with teamwork. Leader to
Leader, (29), 35-40.