Final Paper/ Powerpoint

APPENDIX C

Final Paper Project PowerPoint Presentation – (100 Points)

Criteria Target

24-40

Acceptable

15-23

Unacceptable

0-14

Presentation/Project

Logistics

Presentation/Project is

engaging; the transitions are

skillful and well organized; the

communication style is precise

and contains specific examples

from the sports

journal/portfolio, Christian

worldview, and the chapter

material for each week; the

tone enhances the purposes of

the presentation; no

mechanical or spelling errors

on PowerPoint; all parts of the

requested directions are

addressed.

Presentation/Project points and

communication style are somewhat

engaging; the presentation follows a

logical order of presentation but is

not fully developed; quality of

information is substantial and

relevant, but ambiguous

connections to the sports

journal/portfolio exist; some

mechanical or spelling errors on

PowerPoint; some parts of the

requested directions are addressed.

Presentation/Project errors appear

throughout the document; the number of

errors compromises and distracts from

the quality of the presentation; the

communication style is unprofessional

and un-engaging; no parts of the

requested directions are addressed.

Target

24-40

Acceptable

15-23

Unacceptable

0-14 Content of the

Presentation/Project

Presentation/Project

demonstrates exemplary

knowledge of the content;

provides thorough

understanding of topic and/or

content; critical analysis of

perspectives unique to the

requested directions is

thoroughly demonstrated; clear

alignment between a Christian

worldview, article abstracts,

and the chapter material

covered for each week.

Presentation/Project demonstrates

competent knowledge of the topic,

but lacks critical thoughts; some

ideas lack clarity or conciseness;

overall narrative adequately informs

the audience of sports

journal/portfolio content; the

quality of the sports

journal/portfolio and the analyses

based upon the requested directions

are adequate; acceptable alignment

between a Christian worldview,

article abstracts, and the chapter

material covered for each week.

Presentation/Project demonstrates

inadequate knowledge of the topic;

articulation of the presentation related to

the type of capital exhibits lack of

clarity and conciseness; minimal quality

of the presentation and its analyses of

the requested directions is not

demonstrated; no alignment between a

Christian worldview, article abstracts,

and the chapter material covered for

each week.

Criteria Target

17-20

Acceptable

10-16

Unacceptable

0-9 Critique Presentation/Project contains a

clearly articulated critique

between a Christian

worldview, article abstracts,

and the chapter material

covered each week; It includes

both fact and opinion

statements.

Presentation/Project contains an

undeveloped outlook of a Christian

worldview, article abstracts, and

chapter material covered each week

that needs to be clarified.

Presentation/Project contains no

Christian worldview, article abstracts,

and chapter materials covered each

week.

TOTAL