Intro to Management science

profiledalamri_055
MS14ch06b.pptx

Slides by

John

Loucks

St. Edward’s

University

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

Chapter 6, Part B: Distribution and Network Models

Shortest-Route Problem

Maximal Flow Problem

A Production and Inventory Application

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

Shortest-Route Problem

The shortest-route problem is concerned with finding the shortest path in a network from one node (or set of nodes) to another node (or set of nodes).

If all arcs in the network have nonnegative values then a labeling algorithm can be used to find the shortest paths from a particular node to all other nodes in the network.

The criterion to be minimized in the shortest-route problem is not limited to distance even though the term "shortest" is used in describing the procedure. Other criteria include time and cost. (Neither time nor cost are necessarily linearly related to distance.)

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

Linear Programming Formulation

Using the notation:

xij = 1 if the arc from node i to node j

is on the shortest route

0 otherwise

cij = distance, time, or cost associated

with the arc from node i to node j

continued

Shortest-Route Problem

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

xij > 0 for all i and j

continued

Origin nodes i

Transshipment nodes

Destination nodes j

s.t.

Linear Programming Formulation (continued)

Shortest-Route Problem

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

Susan Winslow has an important business meeting

in Paducah this evening. She has a number of alternate routes by which she can travel from the company headquarters in Lewisburg to Paducah. The network of alternate routes and their respective travel time, ticket cost, and transport mode appear on the next two slides.

If Susan earns a wage of $15 per hour, what route

should she take to minimize the total travel cost?

Example: Shortest-Route

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

6

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

Paducah

Lewisburg

1

2

5

3

4

Network Representation

Example: Shortest-Route

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

Transport Time Ticket

Route Mode (hours) Cost

A Train 4 $ 20

B Plane 1 $115

C Bus 2 $ 10

D Taxi 6 $ 90

E Train 3 1/3 $ 30

F Bus 3 $ 15

G Bus 4 2/3 $ 20

H Taxi 1 $ 15

I Train 2 1/3 $ 15

J Bus 6 1/3 $ 25

K Taxi 3 1/3 $ 50

L Train 1 1/3 $ 10

M Bus 4 2/3 $ 20

Example: Shortest-Route

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

Transport Time Time Ticket Total

Route Mode (hours) Cost Cost Cost

A Train 4 $60 $ 20 $ 80

B Plane 1 $15 $115 $130

C Bus 2 $30 $ 10 $ 40

D Taxi 6 $90 $ 90 $180

E Train 3 1/3 $50 $ 30 $ 80

F Bus 3 $45 $ 15 $ 60

G Bus 4 2/3 $70 $ 20 $ 90

H Taxi 1 $15 $ 15 $ 30

I Train 2 1/3 $35 $ 15 $ 50

J Bus 6 1/3 $95 $ 25 $120

K Taxi 3 1/3 $50 $ 50 $100

L Train 1 1/3 $20 $ 10 $ 30

M Bus 4 2/3 $70 $ 20 $ 90

Example: Shortest-Route

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

Example: Shortest-Route

LP Formulation

Objective Function

Min 80x12 + 40x13 + 80x14 + 130x15 + 180x16 + 60x25

+ 100x26 + 30x34 + 90x35 + 120x36 + 30x43 + 50x45

+ 90x46 + 60x52 + 90x53 + 50x54 + 30x56

Node Flow-Conservation Constraints

x12 + x13 + x14 + x15 + x16 = 1 (origin)

– x12 + x25 + x26 – x52 = 0 (node 2)

– x13 + x34 + x35 + x36 – x43 – x53 = 0 (node 3)

– x14 – x34 + x43 + x45 + x46 – x54 = 0 (node 4)

– x15 – x25 – x35 – x45 + x52 + x53 + x54 + x56 = 0 (node 5)

x16 + x26 + x36 + x46 + x56 = 1 (destination)

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

Example: Shortest-Route

Solution Summary

Minimum total cost = $150

x12 = 0 x25 = 0 x34 = 1 x43 = 0 x52 = 0

x13 = 1 x26 = 0 x35 = 0 x45 = 1 x53 = 0

x14 = 0 x36 = 0 x46 = 0 x54 = 0

x15 = 0 x56 = 1

x16 = 0

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

Maximal Flow Problem

The maximal flow problem is concerned with determining the maximal volume of flow from one node (called the source) to another node (called the sink).

In the maximal flow problem, each arc has a maximum arc flow capacity which limits the flow through the arc.

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

Maximal Flow Problem

A capacitated transshipment model can be developed for the maximal flow problem.

We will add an arc from the sink node back to the source node to represent the total flow through the network.

There is no capacity on the newly added sink-to-source arc.

We want to maximize the flow over the sink-to-source arc.

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

Maximal Flow Problem

LP Formulation

(as Capacitated Transshipment Problem)

There is a variable for every arc.

There is a constraint for every node; the flow out must equal the flow in.

There is a constraint for every arc (except the added sink-to-source arc); arc capacity cannot be exceeded.

The objective is to maximize the flow over the added, sink-to-source arc.

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

Maximal Flow Problem

LP Formulation

(as Capacitated Transshipment Problem)

Max xk1 (k is sink node, 1 is source node)

s.t. xij - xji = 0 (conservation of flow) i j

xij < cij (cij is capacity of ij arc)

xij > 0, for all i and j (non-negativity)

(xij represents the flow from node i to node j)

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

Example: Maximal Flow

National Express operates a fleet of cargo planes and

is in the package delivery business. NatEx is interested

in knowing what is the maximum it could transport in

one day indirectly from San Diego to Tampa (via Denver, St. Louis, Dallas, Houston and/or Atlanta) if its direct flight was out of service.

NatEx's indirect routes from San Diego to Tampa, along with their respective estimated excess shipping capacities (measured in hundreds of cubic feet per day), are shown on the next slide.

Is there sufficient excess capacity to indirectly ship 5000 cubic feet of packages in one day?

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

Network Representation

2

5

1

4

7

3

4

4

3

3

2

3

4

2

3

3

3

1

5

5

1

6

3

Denver

San

Diego

St. Louis

Houston

Tampa

Atlanta

Dallas

6

Example: Maximal Flow

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

Modified Network Representation

4

4

3

3

2

3

4

2

3

3

3

1

5

5

1

6

3

Sink

Source

Added

arc

2

5

1

4

7

3

6

Example: Maximal Flow

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

Example: Maximal Flow

LP Formulation

18 variables (for 17 original arcs and 1 added arc)

24 constraints

7 node flow-conservation constraints

17 arc capacity constraints (for original arcs)

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

Example: Maximal Flow

LP Formulation

Objective Function

Max x71

Node Flow-Conservation Constraints

x12 + x13 + x14 – x71 = 0 (node 1)

– x12 + x24 + x25 – x42 – x52 = 0 (node 2)

– x13 + x34 + x36 – x43 = 0 (and so on)

– x14 – x24 – x34 + x42 + x43 + x45 + x46 + x47 – x54 – x64 = 0

– x25 – x45 + x52 + x54 + x57 = 0

– x36 – x46 + x64 + x67 = 0

– x47 – x57 – x67 + x71 = 0

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

Example: Maximal Flow

LP Formulation (continued)

Arc Capacity Constraints

x12 < 4 x13 < 3 x14 < 4

x24 < 2 x25 < 3

x34 < 3 x36 < 6

x42 < 3 x43 < 5 x45 < 3 x46 < 1 x47 < 3

x52 < 3 x54 < 4 x57 < 2

x64 < 1 x67 < 5

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

Alternative Optimal Solution #1

Objective Function Value = 10.000

Variable Value

x12 3.000

x13 3.000

x14 4.000

x24 1.000

x25 2.000

x34 0.000

x36 5.000

x42 0.000

x43 2.000

Variable Value

x45 0.000

x46 0.000

x47 3.000

x52 0.000

x54 0.000

x57 2.000

x64 0.000

x67 5.000

x71 10.000

Example: Maximal Flow

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

Alternative Optimal Solution #1

3

4

3

2

1

2

3

2

5

5

Sink

Source

10

2

5

1

4

7

3

6

Example: Maximal Flow

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

Alternative Optimal Solution #2

Objective Function Value = 0.000

Variable Value

x12 3.000

x13 3.000

x14 4.000

x24 1.000

x25 2.000

x34 0.000

x36 4.000

x42 0.000

x43 1.000

Variable Value

x45 0.000

x46 1.000

x47 3.000

x52 0.000

x54 0.000

x57 2.000

x64 0.000

x67 5.000

x71 10.000

Example: Maximal Flow

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

Example: Maximal Flow

Alternative Optimal Solution #2

3

4

3

2

1

2

3

1

1

5

4

Sink

Source

10

2

5

1

4

7

3

6

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

A Production & Inventory Application

Transportation and transshipment models can be developed for applications that have nothing to do with the physical movement of goods from origins to destinations.

For example, a transshipment model can be used to solve a production and inventory problem.

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

Example: Production & Inventory Application

Fodak must schedule its production of camera film for the first four months of the year. Film demand (in 000s of rolls) in January, February, March and April is expected to be 300, 500, 650 and 400, respectively. Fodak's production capacity is 500 thousand rolls of film per month.

The film business is highly competitive, so Fodak cannot afford to lose sales or keep its customers waiting. Meeting month i's demand with month i+1's production is unacceptable.

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

Example: Production & Inventory Application

Film produced in month i can be used to meet demand in month i or can be held in inventory to meet demand in month i+1 or month i+2 (but not later due to the film's limited shelf life). There is no film in inventory at the start of January.

The film's production and delivery cost per thousand rolls will be $500 in January and February. This cost will increase to $600 in March and April due to a new labor contract. Any film put in inventory requires additional transport costing $100 per thousand rolls. It costs $50 per thousand rolls to hold film in inventory from one month to the next.

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

Network Representation

Example: Production & Inventory Application

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

Define the decision variables:

xij = amount of film “moving” between node i and

node j

Define objective:

Minimize total production, transportation, and inventory holding cost.

Min 600x15 + 500x18 + 600x26 + 500x29 + 700x37

+ 600x310 + 600x411 + 50x59 + 100x510

+ 50x610 + 100x611 + 50x711

Linear Programming Formulation

Example: Production & Inventory Application

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

Linear Programming Formulation (continued)

Define the constraints:

Amount (1000s of rolls) of film produced in January: x15 + x18 < 500

Amount (1000s of rolls) of film produced in February: x26 + x29 < 500

Amount (1000s of rolls) of film produced in March: x37 + x310 < 500

Amount (1000s of rolls) of film produced in April: x411 < 500

Example: Production & Inventory Application

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

Linear Programming Formulation (continued)

Define the constraints:

Amount (1000s of rolls) of film in/out of January inventory: x15 - x59 - x510 = 0

Amount (1000s of rolls) of film in/out of February inventory: x26 - x610 - x611 = 0

Amount (1000s of rolls) of film in/out of March inventory: x37 - x711 = 0

Example: Production & Inventory Application

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

Linear Programming Formulation (continued)

Define the constraints:

Amount (1000s of rolls) of film satisfying January demand: x18 = 300

Amount (1000s of rolls) of film satisfying February demand: x29 + x59 = 500

Amount (1000s of rolls) of film satisfying March demand: x310 + x510 + x610 = 650

Amount (1000s of rolls) of film satisfying April demand: x411 + x611 + x711 = 400

Non-negativity of variables: xij > 0, for all i and j.

Example: Production & Inventory Application

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

Computer Output

Objective Function Value = 1045000.000

Variable Value Reduced Cost

x15 150.000 0.000

x18 300.000 0.000

x26 0.000 100.000

x29 500.000 0.000

x37 0.000 250.000

x310 500.000 0.000

x411 400.000 0.000

x59 0.000 0.000

x510 150.000 0.000

x610 0.000 0.000

x611 0.000 150.000

x711 0.000 0.000

Example: Production & Inventory Application

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

Optimal Solution

From To Amount

January Production January Demand 300

January Production January Inventory 150

February Production February Demand 500

March Production March Demand 500

January Inventory March Demand 150

April Production April Demand 400

Example: Production & Inventory Application

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

End of Chapter 6, Part B

‹#›

© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted

in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

‹#›

‹#›

2

3

4

7

6

5

11

10

9

8

1

FEBRUARY

PRODUCTION

JANUARY

PRODUCTION

MARCH

PRODUCTION

JANUARY

DEMAND

FEBRUARY

DEMAND

MARCH

DEMAND

APRIL

DEMAND

APRIL

PRODUCTION

MONTH 1

ENDING INVENTORY

MONTH 2

ENDING INVENTORY

MONTH 3

ENDING INVENTORY

500

500

500

500

300

500

650

400

500

600

500

600

700

600

50

100

50

100

50

600