Need back in 37 hours from now

Criteria

No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–10) 10 points

Satisfactory (C range) (11) 11 points

Proficient (B range) (12–13) 13 points

Exemplary (A range) (14–15) 15 points

Revised Information: Revised information from previous submission based on the instructor’s feedback.

Dod not include information from previous submission.

Included information from previous submission but without revision based on instructor's feedback.

Outlined some information previous submission with minimal revision.

Revised information from previous submission based on instructor's feedback.

Revised information from previous submission in a detailed, substantive manner.

Criteria

No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–13) 13 points

Satisfactory (C range) (14–15) 15 points

Proficient (B range) (16–17) 17 points

Exemplary (A range) (18–20) 20 points

Integrated Cover Letter: Integrated a cover letter

Did not include a cover letter.

Included brief cover letter but it is not substantive in nature.

Summarized a cover letter but additional information is needed.

Integrated a cover letter which is complete and inclusive of key information.

Integrated a cover letter which is compelling and inclusive of key information.

Criteria

No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–6) 6 points

Satisfactory (C range) (7) 7 points

Proficient (B range) (8) 8 points

Exemplary (A range) (9–10) 10 points

Integrated Summary: Integrated a summary section

Did not include a summary of the grant project.

Included a summary of the grant project but it is not substantive in nature.

Included a summary of the grant project but additional information is needed.

Integrated a summary of the grant project which includes the main details of the project.

Integrated a detailed, comprehensive summary of the grant project.

Criteria

No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–6) 6 points

Satisfactory (C range) (7) 7 points

Proficient (B range) (8) 8 points

Exemplary (A range) (9–10) 10 points

Integrated Appeal: Integrated an appeal section.

Did not include an appeal section.

Included an appeal section but it is not substantive in nature.

Summarized an appeal section but additional information is needed.

Integrated an appeal section with the appropriate information.

Integrated a detailed, comprehensive appeal section.

Criteria

No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–13) 13 points

Satisfactory (C range) (14–15) 15 points

Proficient (B range) (16–17) 17 points

Exemplary (A range) (18–20) 20 points

Integrated Need Statement: Integrated a need statement with supporting data.

Did not include a need statement with supporting data.

Did not include a need statement or does not include sufficient supporting data.

Summarized a need statement and supporting data but the information is not sufficient and/or revised based on feedback.

Integrated a need statement and supporting data revised based on feedback.

Integrated a well written and compelling need statement which includes sufficient supporting data.

Criteria

No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–13) 13 points

Satisfactory (C range) (14–15) 15 points

Proficient (B range) (16–17) 17 points

Exemplary (A range) (18–20) 20 points

Integrated Goal and Objectives: Integrated a one sentence goal statement and two objectives with the required elements.

Did not include a one sentence goal statement and two objectives with the required elements.

Did not include a one sentence goal statement or two objectives each with the required elements.

Summarized a goal statement and two objectives but they do not meet the requirements for the assignment.

Integrated a one sentence goal statement and two objectives with the required elements.

Integrated a compelling one sentence goal statement and two well written objectives with the required elements.

Criteria

No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–20) 20 points

Satisfactory (C range) (21–23) 23 points

Proficient (B range) (24–26) 26 points

Exemplary (A range) (27–30) 30 points

Integrated Narrative: Integrated a project narrative.

Did not include a project narrative.

Included a brief project narrative but key information about the grant program is missing.

Summarized a project narrative but some information about the grant program is missing.

Integrated a project narrative with information about the key components of the grant program and a timeline.

Integrated a comprehensive project narrative with detailed information about the grant program and a timeline.

Criteria

No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–20) 20 points

Satisfactory (C range) (21–23) 23 points

Proficient (B range) (24–26) 26 points

Exemplary (A range) (27–30) 30 points

Integrated Budget: Integrated an annual budget and budget justification.

Did not include an annual budget and budget justification.

Did not include an annual budget or budget justification.

Summarized an annual budget and budget justification but one or both could be further developed

Integrated an annual budget and budget justification according to requirements.

Integrated an annual budget and budget justification in a comprehensive, substantive manner.

Criteria

No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–13) 13 points

Satisfactory (C range) (14–15) 15 points

Proficient (B range) (16–17) 17 points

Exemplary (A range) (18–20) 20 points

Integrated Closing: Integrated a closing section.

Did not include a closing section.

Included a closing section but it does not adequately summarize the main points of the grant program, does not thank the funder for considering the proposal, and is not signed.

Included a closing section but two of the following are missing: summarizes the main points of the grant program, thanks the funder for considering the proposal, and is signed.

Integrated a closing section but one of the following are missing: summarizes the main points of the grant program, thanks the funder for considering the proposal, and is signed.

Integrated a closing that is professional and provides an excellent conclusion related to the grant program. The funder is thanked and a signature is included.

Criteria

No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–6) 6 points

Satisfactory (C range) (7) 7 points

Proficient (B range) (8) 8 points

Exemplary (A range) (9–10) 10 points

Integrated Appendices List: Integrated a list of appendices.

Did not include a list of appendices

Included actual information not a list of appendices as required.

Included one or two appendices that are related to the grant project.

Integrated three or four appendices that are related to the grant project.

Integrated five or more appendices that are related to the grant project.

Criteria

No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–6) 6 points

Satisfactory (C range) (7) 7 points

Proficient (B range) (8) 8 points

Exemplary (A range) (9–10) 10 points

Communication: Use of tone, word choice, audience, transitions, and progression of ideas.

Assignment contains no discernible overall intent in author’s selection of ideas

Assignment contains random presentation of ideas, which prevents understanding the majority of author’s overall intent.

Ideas are presented in a way that forces the reader to make repeated inferences in order to identify and follow the author’s overall intent.

The reader can follow the author’s overall intent as stated.

The writer’s overall argument and language are clear and tightly focused, leaving the reader with no room for confusion about author’s intent.

Criteria

No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–6) 6 points

Satisfactory (C range) (7) 7 points

Proficient (B range) (8) 8 points

Exemplary (A range) (9–10) 10 points

Mechanics: Use of grammar, sentence structure, and spelling.

Errors in basic writing conventions are sufficiently numerous to prevent reader comprehension

Errors in basic writing conventions are sufficiently numerous to prevent reader comprehension of majority of the work.

Errors in basic writing conventions interfere with, but do not prevent, reader comprehension

A few errors in basic writing conventions but the assignment is mostly error free.

Assignment is basically error free, so that a reader would have to purposely search to find any errors that may be present

Criteria

No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–13) 13 points

Satisfactory (C range) (14–15) 15 points

Proficient (B range) (16–17) 17 points

Exemplary (A range) (18–20) 20 points

Academic/APA Formatting: Use of citations, references, and structural formatting including such elements as cover page, running head, page numbers, introduction, headings (as appropriate), and conclusion.

No attempt at Academic/APA formatting in assignment.

Academic/APA format is attempted, but errors are significant.

Academic/APA format is attempted but errors are distracting.

Uses Academic/APA format. Errors are noticeable but minor.

Uses Academic/APA format proficiently. Text is basically error free.

Overall Score

No Submission 0 or more

Emerging (F through D range) 1 or more

Satisfactory (C range) 157 or more

Proficient (B range) 180 or more

Exemplary (A range) 202 or more