another questions

profileafalmuta
Moudule1materailsforresult.ppt

Chapter 1

Performance Management
and Reward Systems
in Context

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1.pdf

Performance management third edition

herman aguinis www.pearsonhighered.com

ISBN-13: ISBN-10:

978-0-13-255638-5 0-13-255638-3

9 7 8 0 1 3 2 5 5 6 3 8 5

9 0 0 0 0 a

g u

in is

Perfo rm

a n

ce m a

n a

g em

en t

t h

ir d

ed it

io n

Overview

Definition of Performance Management (PM)

The PM Contribution

Disadvantages/Dangers of Poorly Implemented PM Systems

Definition of Reward Systems

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Overview (continued)

Purposes of PM Systems

Characteristics of an Ideal PM System

Integration with Other Human Resources and Development Activities

PM Around the World

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Definition of PM

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

  • Continuous process of …
  • Identifying
  • Measuring
  • Developing

… the performance of individuals and teams

  • Aligning performance with the strategic goals of the organization

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Definition of PM (continued)

Performance management (PM)


is NOT

performance appraisal (PA)

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Definition of PM (continued)

PM

  • Strategic business considerations
  • Driven by line manager
  • Ongoing feedback

So employee can improve performance

PA

  • Driven by HR
  • Assesses employee

Strengths

Weaknesses

  • Once a year
  • Lacks ongoing feedback

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Contributions of
Performance Management

For Employees

For Managers

For Organization/HR Function

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Contributions of Performance Management for Employees

  • Clarify definitions of

Job

Success criteria

Increase motivation to perform

Increase self-esteem

Enhance self-insight and development

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall


Contributions of Performance Management for Managers

Communicate supervisors’ views of performance more clearly

Managers gain insight about subordinates

Better and more timely differentiation between good and poor performers

Employees become more competent

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Contributions of Performance Management for Organization/HR Function

Clarify organizational goals

Facilitate organizational change

Fairer, more appropriate administrative actions

Better protection from lawsuits

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall


Disadvantages/Dangers of
Poorly Implemented
PM Systems

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

  • For Employees
  • For Managers
  • For Organization/HR Function

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Disadvantages/Dangers of Poorly Implemented PM Systems for Employees

  • Lowered self-esteem
  • Employee burnout and job dissatisfaction
  • Damaged relationships
  • Use of false or misleading information

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Disadvantages/Dangers of Poorly Implemented PM Systems for Managers

Increased turnover

Decreased motivation to perform

Unjustified demands on managers’ resources

Varying and unfair standards and ratings

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Disadvantages/Dangers of Poorly Implemented PM Systems for Organization/HR Function

Wasted time and money

Unclear ratings system

Emerging biases

Increased risk of litigation

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Reward Systems

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

  • Definition
  • Tangible Returns
  • Intangible Returns
  • Returns and their Degrees of Dependency on PM
  • For Organization/HR Function

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Reward Systems
Definition

Set of mechanisms for distributing…

Tangible returns

Intangible or relational returns

… as part of an employment relationship

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Reward Systems
Tangible Returns

Cash compensation

Base pay

Cost-of-Living and Contingent Pay

Incentives (short- and long-term)

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Base pay

Hourly wages

Salary

Cost-of-Living & Contingent Pay

Usually permanent increases in pay based on either cost of living or performance

Covered in more detail in Module 11

Incentives (short- and long-term)

Used to increase performance

E.g., bonuses (short term) or stock options/ownership (long term)

Income Protection

Sometimes required under law, such as

Social Security (what about unemployment insurance in the USA?) Disability pay,

medical insurance,

pension plans,

savings plans

Allowances

E.g., housing

transportation (e.g., company provides car)

Reward Systems
Tangible Returns (continued)

Benefits such as

Income Protection

Allowances

Work/life focus

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Reward Systems
Intangible Returns

Relational returns such as

Recognition and status

Employment security

Challenging work

Learning opportunities

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Work/life focus (to help employee balance work/home life)

Such as vacation time,

flextime and telecommuting,

services (e.g., counseling, financial planning, fitness activities)

Relational Returns

Such as recognition,

status,

employment security,

challenging work,

opportunities to learn,

opportunities to form personal relationships

Returns and Their Degrees of Dependency on the Performance Management System

  • Low Dependency

Cost of Living Adjustment

Income Protection

  • Moderate Dependency
  • High Dependency

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Returns and Their Degrees of Dependency on the Performance Management System (Continued)

  • Low Dependency
  • Moderate Dependency

Work/Life Focus

Allowances

Relational Returns

Base Pay

  • High Dependency

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Returns and Their Degrees of Dependency on the Performance Management System (Continued)

  • Low Dependency
  • Moderate Dependency
  • High Dependency

Contingent Pay

Short-Term Incentives

Long-Term Incentives

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Purposes of PM Systems

  • Strategic
  • Administrative
  • Informational
  • Developmental
  • Organizational maintenance
  • Documentation

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Purposes of PM Systems
Strategic Purpose

Link individual goals with organization’s goals

Communicate most crucial business strategic initiatives

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Note: the following is slide used before (some of this is not in Module 1)

Links employee activities with organization’s mission and goals

Identifies results and behaviors needed to carry out strategy

Maximizes extent employees exhibit those behaviors and results

Only 13% of organizations use PM to communicate organizational purpose and goals

Purposes of PM Systems
Administrative Purpose

Provide information for making decisions regarding:

Salary adjustments

Promotions

Retention or termination

Recognition of individual performance

Layoffs

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Purposes of PM Systems
Informational Purpose

Communicate to employees:

Expectations

What is important

How they are doing

How to improve

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Purposes of PM Systems
Developmental Purpose

Performance feedback/coaching

Identification of individual strengths and weaknesses

Identification of causes of performance deficiencies

Tailor development of individual career path

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Purposes of PM Systems
Organizational Maintenance Purpose

Plan effective workforce

Assess future training needs

Evaluate performance at organizational level

Evaluate effectiveness of HR interventions

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Purposes of PM Systems
Documentation Purpose

Validate selection instruments

Document administrative decisions

Help meet legal requirements

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

An Ideal PM System:
15 Characteristics

Strategically congruent

Contextually congruent

Thorough

Practical

Meaningful

Specific

Identifies effective and ineffective performance

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

An Ideal PM System:
15 Characteristics (continued)

Reliable

Valid

Acceptable and fair

Inclusive

Open (No Secrets)

Correctable

Standardized

Ethical

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

An Ideal PM System:
15 Characteristics
Strategically Congruent

  • Consistent with organization’s strategy
  • Aligned with unit and organizational goals

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

An Ideal PM System:
15 Characteristics
Contextually Congruent

  • Congruent with the organization’s culture as well as the broader cultural context of the region or country

Example: A 360-degree feedback is not effective where communication is not fluid and hierarchies are rigid

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

An Ideal PM System:
15 Characteristics
Thorough

  • All employees are evaluated
  • All major job responsibilities are evaluated
  • Evaluations cover performance for entire review period
  • Feedback is given on both positive and negative performance

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

An Ideal PM System:
15 Characteristics
Practical

  • Available
  • Easy to use
  • Acceptable to decision makers
  • Benefits outweigh costs

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

An Ideal PM System:
15 Characteristics
Meaningful

  • Standards are important and relevant
  • System measures ONLY what employee can control
  • Results have consequences
  • Evaluations occur regularly and at appropriate times
  • System provides for continuing skill development of evaluators

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

An Ideal PM System:
15 Characteristics
Specific

Concrete and detailed guidance to employees

What’s expected

How to meet the expectations

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

An Ideal PM System:
15 Characteristics
Identifies effective and ineffective performance

  • Distinguish between effective and ineffective:

Behaviors

Results

  • Provide ability to identify employees with various levels of performance.

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

An Ideal PM System:
15 Characteristics
Reliable

  • Consistent
  • Free of error
  • Inter-rater reliability

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

An Ideal PM System:
15 Characteristics
Valid

  • Relevant (i.e., measures what is important)
  • Not deficient (i.e., doesn’t measure unimportant facets of job)
  • Not contaminated (i.e., only measures what the employee can control)

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

An Ideal PM System:
15 Characteristics
Acceptable and Fair

  • Perception of Distributive Justice

Work performed  Evaluation received  Reward

Perception of Procedural Justice

Fairness of procedures used to:

Determine ratings

Link ratings to rewards

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

An Ideal PM System:
15 Characteristics
Inclusive

  • Represents concerns of all involved

When system is created, employees should help with deciding:

What should be measured

How it should be measured

Employee should provide input on performance prior to evaluation meeting.

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

An Ideal PM System:
15 Characteristics
Open (No Secrets)

  • Frequent, ongoing evaluations and feedback
  • Two-way communications in appraisal meeting
  • Clear standards and ongoing communication
  • Communications are factual, open, and honest

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

An Ideal PM System:
15 Characteristics
Correctable

  • Recognizes that human judgment is fallible
  • Appeals process provided

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

An Ideal PM System:
15 Characteristics
Standardized

  • Ongoing training of managers to provide
  • Consistent evaluations across:

People

Time

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

An Ideal PM System:
15 Characteristics
Ethical

  • Supervisor suppresses self-interest
  • Supervisor rates only where (s)he has sufficient information about the performance dimension
  • Supervisor respects employee privacy

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Integration with other Human Resources and Development Activities

  • PM provides information for:

Development of training to meet organizational needs

Workforce planning

Recruitment and hiring decisions

Development of compensation systems

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

PM Around the World

  • PM used in United States, Mexico, Turkey, India, Australia, China, and so on
  • Common across countries: Need to align individual and organizational goals to enhance the performance of individuals and groups

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

PM Around the World (continued)

Yet, different countries emphasize different components of PM

EX 1: PMs in Japan tend to emphasize behaviors to the detriment of results

EX 2: The current challenge among many organizations in South Korea is how to reconcile a merit-based approach with more traditional cultural values

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Quick Review

  • Definition of Performance Management (PM)
  • The Performance Management Contribution
  • Disadvantages/Dangers of Poorly Implemented PM Systems
  • Definition of Reward Systems
  • Aims and Role of PM Systems
  • Characteristics of an Ideal PM System
  • Integration with Other Human Resources and Development Activities
  • PM Around the World

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America.

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-*

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

*

Base pay

Hourly wages

Salary

Cost-of-Living & Contingent Pay

Usually permanent increases in pay based on either cost of living or performance

Covered in more detail in Module 11

Incentives (short- and long-term)

Used to increase performance

E.g., bonuses (short term) or stock options/ownership (long term)

Income Protection

Sometimes required under law, such as

Social Security (what about unemployment insurance in the USA?) Disability pay,

medical insurance,

pension plans,

savings plans

Allowances

E.g., housing

transportation (e.g., company provides car)

Work/life focus (to help employee balance work/home life)

Such as vacation time,

flextime and telecommuting,

services (e.g., counseling, financial planning, fitness activities)

Relational Returns

Such as recognition,

status,

employment security,

challenging work,

opportunities to learn,

opportunities to form personal relationships

Note: the following is slide used before (some of this is not in Module 1)

Links employee activities with organization’s mission and goals

Identifies results and behaviors needed to carry out strategy

Maximizes extent employees exhibit those behaviors and results

Only 13% of organizations use PM to communicate organizational purpose and goals

*