Managerial Accounting Cost Analysis Motomart 2

profilemajk_v
Motomart2Feedback.docx

Name: La`Jaun CherRenfro

Student ID:22980875

Email: [email protected]

Course: Senior Capstone Business Motomart Section 3.1

GRADE: 56%

La Juan – if you have questions on this assignment please contact me directly through your portal. I’ll be happy to assist.

Ken D.

Instructor

Step 1

The analysis shows that the semi-fixed expenses show an increasing trend due to the increased net variable revenue. The firm’s fixed expenditure is snowballing at a quicker stride linked to the increase in disposable variable revenue. The firm’s entire fixed expenses are growing by a more rapid hop equated to the rise in net irregular incomes. Consequently, this is a sign that the semi-fixed charge mainly comprises fixed cost; else, the augmentation stride in semi-fixed expenditures would be equivalent to lesser than the augmentation in the net variable proceeds. The operating profit has been declining from the year 1984 to the year 1988. It is roughly 43% in 1984 and cascades to -196% in 1988, which is exactly five years from 1984. The operating loss in 1988 is too much. What about the expense that is zero? This would not make sense and needs to be stated as an error or unusual circumstance. -5pts

Year

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

Trend of Operating Profit

263,828

263,828

=100%

112,314

263,828

43%

-96699

263,828

-37%

-94,345

263,828

-36%

-516,092

263,828

-196%

Trend of semi fixed Expense

1,172,933

1,172,933

= 100%

1,665,769

1,172,933

= 142%

1,892,499

1,172,933

= 161%

1,870,782

1,172,933

159%

2,161,220

1,172,933

184%

Trend in Net Variable Revenues

2,885,969

2,885,969

100%

3,828,255

2,885,969

= 133%

4,086,667

2,885,969

= 142%

3,940,799

2,885,969

137%

4,298,748

2,885,969

= 149%

Trend in Total Fixed Expense

1,449,208

1,449,208

= 100%

2,050,172

1,449,208

= 141%

2,290,867

1,449,208

158%

2,164,362

1,449,208

149%

2,653,620

1,449,208

183%

Step 2

The firm’s semi-fixed expenses must have augmented as a result of an increase in the net variable incomes between the year 1984to 1988. Though, there are some expensive items that portray a mixed trend and a decrease over that period.

Vacation expense item only improved between the year 1984 and 1985 by $ 26,105 and decreased over the other years. It further declined between the years 1985 and 1986 by $ 7,237,409. It also decreased by $409 between 1986 and 1987. It further decreased between 1987 and 1988 by $ 791. The cause of the trend might be an increase or decrease in the number of units.

Freight expense displayed varied tendency as it solitary augmented between 1984 and 1985 by $11,706. They also augmented between 1985 and 1986 by $541. The freight expenses decreased from 1986 to 1987 by $ 797. The charge was reduced between 1987 and 1988 by $ 1,068. The motive for this trend might be as a result of a high and low regulator on variable cost. This infrequent trend might also be a result of a decrease or increase in the figure of units.

Motor vehicle expense exhibited a varied trend as there was a trivial surge between 1984 and 1985 of $805. There was a stable deterioration afterward in 1986 of $ 54, deterioration of $3,294 in the year 1987 and decrease in 1988 of $887. The cause for this trend is that the number of units might have increased.

The demonstrators’ expenses decreased by $ 5,486 between the year 1984 to 1985. There was a decrease of $3,456 in 1986, with a surge from 1986 to 1987 of $2,679. There is a radical decrease in the year 1988 of $ 3,485. This trend in demonstrators’ expense items may be a result of inflation of variable cost per unit.

The floor planning expense displayed a mixed trend with a rise between 1984 and 1985 of $ 22,582. The expenses diminished between the years 1985 and 1986 to $24,912. There was a decrease from 1986 to 1987 of $120,072. Thereafter, a great rise from the year 1987 to 1988 of $148,915. This trend in floor planning expense may be a result of a change in units.

Step 3 See Excel Attachment.

This can be arrived by considering high as well as low points of each activity.

 Expense

 High point

 Low point

New Retail Vehicles

280

31

Salaries

49,049

57,479

Vacation

19,992

22,223

Advertising

1,999

7,043

Supplies/Tools/Laundry

582

560

Freight

1,927

2,183

Vehicle

-477

1,014

Demonstrators

-30104

66745

Floor-Planning

42,968

15,7247

-1/2pt each, -8pts total

 

New Vehicle Retail

Semi Fixed Expense

High

4,298,748

2,161,220

Low

2,885,969

1,172,933

Difference

1,412,779

988,287

Step 4 See Excel Attachment

Expense

Fixed Cost

Variable Cost

R Squared

1 Salaries

106,866

-110.31

4.1%

2 Vacation

1,402

9.09

8.56%

3 Advertising and training

24,345

150.85

`14.36%

4 Supplies/tools/laundry

5,004

29.03

1.721%

5 Freight

477

2.99

1.563%

6 Vehicles

1,836

11.39

11.73%

7 Demonstrators

314

1.32

0.016%

8 Floor planning

21,950

99.41

0.191

 

New Vehicle Retail

Semi Fixed Expense

High

4,298,748

2,161,220

Low

2,885,969

1,172,933

Difference

1,412,779

988,287

-1pt each, -21pts

The problem encountered is that the data was huge. Most of the variable cost values was negative which is impossible in practical.

The R squared measures are too low and in some cases the R squared is zero.

Most of the slopes are negative.

My conclusions are not consistent with those of high-low efforts. The reason behind this is due to the fact that the high low formula is leading to negative fixed cost while the regression methods is displaying adverse variable costs.

Step 5

The firm’s data can be used to come up with a dependable financial prediction. The reason behind this is the fact that the firm has to have meager financial records annually. The data should not be relied upon, as you state below. There are three main principles that need to be stated as to why it was not correctly constructed data. -10pts

I would not depend on this prediction because the use of a new retail vehicle as the base year doesn’t provide a clear depiction of fixed as well as variable components of semi-fixed expense.