case study

CYB 260 Module Two Activity Guidelines and Rubric

Privacy Case Study

Overview

As a cybersecurity analyst, you must be able to evaluate current scholarly ar�cles because that skill will help you protect data. Evalua�ng privacy laws and regula�ons helps analysts form

baselines for policies within organiza�ons. Choose one of the case studies from this module’s resources to analyze for this assignment.

Prompt

A�er reading your selected ar�cle, address the following cri�cal elements:

I. Analyze the privacy issues addressed in the ar�cle.

II. Describe the regula�ons or laws in the ar�cle that play a role in the protec�on of privacy.

III. Explain your opinions on the conclusion of the ar�cle. Consider these ques�ons:

A. Is the conclusion comprehensive?

B. Do you agree with the conclusion?

C. Are there areas that could be improved upon?

What to Submit

Your submission should be 1 to 2 pages in length and use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Use a file name that includes the course code, the

assignment �tle, and your name—for example, CYB_100_Project_One_Neo_Anderson.docx.

Module Two Activity Rubric

Criteria Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Issues Analyzes the issues within the ar�cle

related to privacy

Addresses “Proficient” criteria, but there

are gaps in clarity, logic, or detail

Does not address cri�cal element, or

response is irrelevant

30

Protec�on of Privacy Describes the regula�ons or laws within

the ar�cle that play a role in the protec�on

of privacy

Addresses “Proficient” criteria, but there

are gaps in clarity, logic, or detail

Does not address cri�cal element, or

response is irrelevant

30



1/15/25, 10:13 AM Assignment Information

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/content/1831858/viewContent/38649347/View 1/2

Criteria Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Conclusion Explains opinions on the conclusion of the

ar�cle

Addresses “Proficient” criteria, but there

are gaps in clarity, logic, or detail

Does not address cri�cal element, or

response is irrelevant

30

Ar�cula�on of Response Submission is free of errors related to

grammar, spelling, and organiza�on and is

presented in a professional and easy-to-

read format

Submission has some errors related to

grammar, spelling, or organiza�on that

nega�vely impact readability and

ar�cula�on of main ideas

Submission has cri�cal errors related to

grammar, spelling, or organiza�on that

prevent understanding of ideas

10

Total: 100%

1/15/25, 10:13 AM Assignment Information

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/content/1831858/viewContent/38649347/View 2/2