Research Assignment technology

Module Three Research Assignment

due May 29

before 1pmEst

U

sing

the article attached

here is the citation for it:

Danziger, J. N., Kraemer, K. L., & Dunkle, D. E. (1993). Enhancing the quality of computing service: technology, structure,

and people. Public Administration Review, 53, 161

–

169.

https://doi

-

org.db07.linccweb.org/10.2307/976709

Instructions:

Page One Art

icle Title: List the article publication information using APA style for reference list citations, “e.g. Smith, N

(2005). Information technology in the public sector. Technology and Public Administration Journal, 12(3), 125

-

136.”

Page Two Summary (must b

e at least 100 words): List the article’s thesis (or hypotheses), methodology and evidence, its

logic or argument, and summarizes its conclusions.

Please check

grammar

will be placed in

TURNITIN

Must follow

this g

rading

criteria

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

RESPONSIVENESS (Did the student respond adequately to the paper

or

writing assignment?)

Responds to assigned or selected topic; Goes beyond what is required in some meaningful way (e.g., ideas contribute a

new dimension to what we know about the topic, unearths something unanticipated); Is substantive and evi

dence

-

based; Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that

the assignment answer/paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content; and Is submitted by the due

date.

CONTENT KNOWLEDGE (Does the content in the paper or writing assignment demonstrate an understanding of the

important knowledge the paper/assignment is intended to demonstrate?)

In

-

depth understanding and application of conc

epts and issues presented in the course (e.g., insightful interpretations or

analyses; accurate and perceptive parallels, ideas, opinions, and conclusions), showing that the student has absorbed

the general principles and ideas presented and makes inferenc

es about the concepts/issues or connects to them to

other ideas; Rich and relevant examples; Thought

-

provoking ideas and interpretations, original thinking, new

perspectives; Original and critical thinking; and Mastery and thoughtful/accurate application o

f knowledge and skills or

strategies presented in the course.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

QUALITY OF WRITING

Uses language that is clear, concise, and appropriate; Has few if any errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; Is extreme

ly

well organized, logical, and clear and never confuses the reader; Uses a preponderance of original language and uses

direct quotes only when necessary and/or appropriate; and Provides information about a source when citing or

paraphrasing it.

This criter

ion is linked to a Learning Outcome

RESEARCH, SCHOLARSHIP, AND PROFESSIONAL STYLE

Significantly contributes to the knowledge in the field; Is well supported by current and pertinent research/evidence

(within the previous 5 years, except for semina

l, original research where appropriate) from a variety of primarily

primary, peer

-

reviewed sources (rather than textbooks and Web sites); and Consistently uses correct APA form and style

(including citations, references, nonbiased language, clear organizat

ion, good editorial style, etc.) with very few or no

errors.

Module Three Research Assignment due May 29 before 1pmEst

Using the article attached here is the citation for it:

Danziger, J. N., Kraemer, K. L., & Dunkle, D. E. (1993). Enhancing the quality of computing service: technology, structure,

and people. Public Administration Review, 53, 161–169. https://doi-org.db07.linccweb.org/10.2307/976709

Instructions:

Page One Article Title: List the article publication information using APA style for reference list citations, “e.g. Smith, N

(2005). Information technology in the public sector. Technology and Public Administration Journal, 12(3), 125-136.”

Page Two Summary (must be at least 100 words): List the article’s thesis (or hypotheses), methodology and evidence, its

logic or argument, and summarizes its conclusions.

Please check grammar will be placed in TURNITIN

Must follow this grading criteria

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome RESPONSIVENESS (Did the student respond adequately to the paper or

writing assignment?)

Responds to assigned or selected topic; Goes beyond what is required in some meaningful way (e.g., ideas contribute a

new dimension to what we know about the topic, unearths something unanticipated); Is substantive and evidence-

based; Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that

the assignment answer/paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content; and Is submitted by the due

date.

CONTENT KNOWLEDGE (Does the content in the paper or writing assignment demonstrate an understanding of the

important knowledge the paper/assignment is intended to demonstrate?)

In-depth understanding and application of concepts and issues presented in the course (e.g., insightful interpretations or

analyses; accurate and perceptive parallels, ideas, opinions, and conclusions), showing that the student has absorbed

the general principles and ideas presented and makes inferences about the concepts/issues or connects to them to

other ideas; Rich and relevant examples; Thought-provoking ideas and interpretations, original thinking, new

perspectives; Original and critical thinking; and Mastery and thoughtful/accurate application of knowledge and skills or

strategies presented in the course.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome QUALITY OF WRITING

Uses language that is clear, concise, and appropriate; Has few if any errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; Is extremely

well organized, logical, and clear and never confuses the reader; Uses a preponderance of original language and uses

direct quotes only when necessary and/or appropriate; and Provides information about a source when citing or

paraphrasing it.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome RESEARCH, SCHOLARSHIP, AND PROFESSIONAL STYLE

Significantly contributes to the knowledge in the field; Is well supported by current and pertinent research/evidence

(within the previous 5 years, except for seminal, original research where appropriate) from a variety of primarily

primary, peer-reviewed sources (rather than textbooks and Web sites); and Consistently uses correct APA form and style

(including citations, references, nonbiased language, clear organization, good editorial style, etc.) with very few or no

errors.