6-3 neuropsych

profilejan29
ModuleSixShortPaperGuidelinesandRubric.html.zip

Module Six Short Paper Guidelines and Rubric.html

PSY 634 Module Six Short Paper Guidelines and Rubric

Prompt

You have learned that cognitive issues affecting learning or memory can be congenital or acquired (accidental) in origin. You will choose a learning or memory deficit to explore for this paper. Consider children and adolescents at various developmental levels, and describe a deficit in learning or memory. What brain structures and circuits are related to your selected deficit? How would the deficit impair daily functioning in academic, social, and emotional domains? What assessments and interventions would help detect and treat the dysfunction?

Your paper should include all the following elements:

  1. Describe a deficit in learning or memory in children or adolescents.
  2. Identify brain structures and circuits related to the selected deficit.
  3. Analyze how the selected deficit would impair daily functioning in academic, social, and emotional domains.
  4. Identify the assessments to use for detecting the selected dysfunction.
  5. Identify the interventions to use for treating the dysfunction.

What to Submit

The short paper should be 2–4 pages, double-spaced, with 12-point Times New Roman font and 1-inch margins, and include citations in APA format.

Module Six Short Paper Rubric

Criteria Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Description of Deficit Meets “Proficient” criteria and substantiates description with scholarly research Describes a deficit in learning or memory in children or adolescents Describes the learning or memory deficit, but the description lacks detail Does not describe a deficit in learning or memory in children or adolescents 10
Identification of Brain Structures Meets “Proficient” criteria and substantiates description with scholarly research Identifies brain structures and circuits related to the selected deficit Identifies brain structures and circuits related to the selected deficit, but does not fully describe the deficits Does not identify brain structures or circuits related to the selected deficit 20
Analysis of Impairment Meets “Proficient” criteria and supports analysis with evidence from scholarly research Analyzes how the selected deficit would impair daily functioning in academic, social, and emotional domains Analyzes how the selected deficit would impair daily functioning in academic, social, and emotional domains, but the analysis lacks detail and substance Does not analyze how the selected deficit would impair daily functioning in academic, social, and emotional domains 20
Identification of Assessments Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides validation for assessments with evidence from scholarly research Identifies the assessments that would be used to detect the selected dysfunction Identifies assessments to detect the selected dysfunction, but they are minimally addressed Does not identify the assessments that would be used to detect the selected dysfunction 20
Identification of Interventions Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides validation for interventions with evidence from scholarly research Identifies the interventions that would be used to treat the dysfunction Identifies interventions to treat the selected dysfunction, but they are minimally addressed Does not identify the interventions that would be used to treat the dysfunction 20
Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 10
Total: 100%