BUS 225
Module One Blog Guidelines and Rubric.html
Overview
Business leaders are often faced with situations that require swift but responsible decisions. You’ve learned how critical thinking is more than simply evaluating the pros and cons of a situation. It is a method that engages broad thinking abilities that include brainstorming, data analysis, creativity, collaboration, and reflection. The ability to adapt to ever-changing conditions through critical thinking and decision making is key to capitalizing on market upturns and staying afloat during economic declines.
As part of this course, you will complete a series of assignments.
Prompt
For this assignment, analyze the diversification strategy of either Disney or Kimberly-Clark using the documents linked within your Soomo webtext. Explain how critical thinking applies to decision making based on your review of a real-world scenario. Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
- Application: Explain how critical thinking for decision making is applicable to the scenario. Use evidence to support your explanations.
- What makes critical thinking crucial for decision making?
- Analysis: Explain how information (such as facts, opinions, and published reports) is used to determine or establish the context. Use evidence to support your explanations.
- Why do you think the company reached the decision to diversify?
- What steps do you believe were taken? Explain your response using sources found during the research of your selected company.
- Conclusion and related outcomes: Describe the role of logic, evidence, and arguments in the company’s decision-making process.
- Was the decision to expand products, services, or value chain successful? Why or why not?
To begin, choose one of the following to focus on for this assignment and review the corresponding document provided in the Soomo webtext.
- Kimberly-Clark
- Disney
Guidelines for Submission
Complete the Critical Thinking for Business Decisions worksheet in your Soomo webtext, download your completed work, and submit it in Brightspace for instructor feedback. You should write using a professional voice, and any sources should be cited according to APA style. Your assignment must be between 400 and 800 words in length.
Module One Assignment Rubric
| Criteria | Exemplary (100%) | Proficient (85%) | Needs Improvement (55%) | Not Evident (0%) | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Explains how critical thinking for decision making is applicable to the scenario | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include explanation of how critical thinking for decision making is applicable to the scenario | Does not attempt criterion | 25 |
| Analysis | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Explains how information such as facts, opinions, and published reports are used to determine or establish the context | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include explanation of how information such as facts, opinions, and published reports are used to determine or establish the context | Does not attempt criterion | 30 |
| Conclusion and Related Outcomes | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Describes the role of logic, evidence, and arguments in the company’s decision-making process | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include more detailed description of the role of logic, evidence, and arguments | Does not attempt criterion | 25 |
| Articulation of Response | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Clearly conveys meaning with correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, demonstrating an understanding of audience and purpose | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, negatively impacting readability | Submission has critical errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, preventing understanding of ideas | 10 |
| Citations and Attributions | Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with few or no minor errors | Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with consistent minor errors | Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with major errors | Does not use citations for ideas requiring attribution | 10 |
| Total: | 100% |