Public Health PowerPoint

profilenikkyvu
Module8Assignment8.2-RUBRIC.docx

6/19/26, 10:48 AM Preview Rubric: DNP865 Signature Assignment Rubric v1 - DNP865 Sect1 Healthcare Technologies and Informatics - Aspen University Classroom

6/19/26, 10:48 AM Preview Rubric: DNP865 Signature Assignment Rubric v1 - DNP865 Sect1 Healthcare Technologies and Informatics - Aspen University Classroom

DNP865 Signature Assignment Rubric v1

Course: DNP865 Sect1 Healthcare Technologies and Informatics

Criteria

Does Not Meet

Expectations

Approaches

Expectations

Meets Expectations

Exceeds Expectations

Criterion Score

Introduction &

background pre

-

sented with sup

-

porting graphic

displays Weight:

25

%

/ 125

0

points

(0-87

pts.

)

Introduction is miss

-

ing. Background in

-

formation and asso

-

ciated graphic dis

-

plays are not clear

or are missing.

87.5

points

(87.5-99

pts.

)

Introduction is

vague. Background

information and as

-

sociated graphic dis

-

plays are present

but missing key

details.

100

points

pts.

(100-112

)

Introduction is ap

-

propriate.

Background infor

-

mation and associ

-

ated graphic dis

-

plays are appropri

-

ate and complete.

125

points

)

pts.

(112.5-125

Introduction is clear

and concise.

Background infor

-

mation and associ

-

ated graphic dis

-

plays are thorough,

elegant, and ex

-

pertly presented.

Criteria

Does Not Meet

Expectations

Approaches

Expectations

Meets Expectations

Exceeds Expectations

Criterion Score

Summary & next

steps Weight:

%

15

/ 75

The visual qual

-

ity of the pre

-

sentation

Weight: 10%

/ 50

0

points

(0

- 52 pts

)

The summary and

next steps are inap

-

propriate or

missing.

52.5

points

(52.5

– 59 pts

)

The summary and

next steps are

somewhat

appropriate.

60

points

(60

– 67 pts

)

The summary and

next steps are ap

-

propriate for needs,

and follow-up is ad

-

dressed clearly.

75

points

(67.5 - 75

pts

)

Summary and next

steps are not only

appropriate, but fol

-

low-up needs are

addressed clearly,

and show originality

and creativity.

0

points

(0

-34 pts

)

Visual quality is not

acceptable or pleas

-

ant for viewers. APA

format and style are

not evident.

35

points

(35

– 39 pts

)

Visual quality is not

acceptable or pleas

-

ant for viewers.

Missing APA ele

-

ments; in-text cita

-

tions, where neces

-

sary, are used but

formatted inaccu

-

rately and not

referenced.

points

40

)

(40 -

44 pts

Visual quality is not

acceptable or pleas

-

ant for viewers. All

key elements of an

APA title page are

present; In-text cita

-

tions and a refer

-

ence page are

present with few

format errors.

Mechanics of writ

-

ing are reflective of

the APA style.

50

points

(45 -

50 pts

)

Visual quality is ac

-

ceptable or pleasant

for viewers. A broad

understanding of

APA format and

style is evident.

Accurate citations

and references are

presented. No APA

errors are evident.

Overall Score

Total

/ 500

Level 1

0

points minimum

Level 2

350

points minimum

Level 3

400

points minimum

Level 4

500

points minimum

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/119358/viewContent/6335775/View 1/4

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/119358/viewContent/6335775/View 1/4

1/4

image1.png