Nursing MODULE 8 ASSIGNMENT Week 8

Module8Assignment-RUBRIC.docx

Home >Nursing homework help >Nursing MODULE 8 ASSIGNMENT Week 8

9/1/25, 9:10 PM Preview Rubric: DNP845 Signature Assignment Rubric v1 - DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings - Aspen University Classroom

Criteria

Does Not Meet

Expectations

Approaches

Expectations

Meets Expectations

Exceeds Expectations

Criterion Score

Criteria

Does Not Meet

Expectations

Approaches

Expectations

Meets Expectations

Exceeds Expectations

Criterion Score

DNP845 Signature Assignment Rubric v1

Course: DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings

Criteria

Does Not Meet

Expectations

Approaches

Expectations

Meets Expectations

Exceeds Expectations

Criterion Score

Platforms for

Dissemination

Weight: 25%

/ 125

points

pts.

)

(0-87

Identification of the

three platforms for

knowledge dissemi

nation is not clearly

demonstrated or

missing. The details

explaining why each

platform is appropri

ate is inappropriate

or missing.

87.5

points

(87.5-99

pts.

)

Identification of the

three platforms for

knowledge dissemi

nation is present but

missing key details.

The details explain

ing why each plat

form is included but

missing key

information.

100

points

(100-112

pts.

)

Identification of the

three platforms for

knowledge dissemi

nation is appropriate

and complete. The

details explaining

why each platform

is appropriate.

125

points

(112.5-125

pts.

)

Identification of the

three platforms is

thorough and ex

pertly assembled.

The details explain

ing why each plat

form is beneficial to

disseminating the

project.

EBP Research

Identified

Weight: 25%

0 points

(0-87 pts.)

Discussion of evidence-based practice research not demonstrated clearly or missing.

87.5 points

(87.5-99 pts.)

Discussion of EBP research is included but some details are missing.

100 points

(100-112 pts.)

Discussion of EBP research is present, appropriate and complete.

125 points

(112.5- 125 pts.)

Discussion of EBP research is thoroughly identified and clearly, expertly explained.

/ 125

Determination of Future Actions Weight:

25%

0 points

(0-87 pts)

Determination of future actions based on implementation success not demonstrated clearly or missing.

87.5 points

(87.5-99 pts)

Determination of future actions based on implementation success are included but some details are missing.

100 points

(100-112 pts)

Determination of future actions based on implementation success are present, appropriate, and complete.

125 points

(112.5-125 pts)

Determination of future actions based on implementation success clearly explained and thoroughly demonstrated.

/ 125

Quality of

Written

Communication

Weight: 15%

0 points

(0-52 pts)

Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

52.5 points

(52.5-59 pts)

Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd.

Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

60 points

(60-67 pts)

Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word

choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

75 points

(67.5-75 pts)

Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

/ 75

Total

/ 500

APA Format

Weight: 10%

/ 50

points

(0-34

pts

)

APA format and

style are not

evident.

points

(35-39

pts

)

Missing APA ele

ments; in-text cita

tions, where neces

sary, are used but

formatted inaccu

rately and not

referenced.

points

)

pts

(40-44

All key elements of

an APA title page

are present; In-text

citations and a ref

erence page are

present with few

format errors.

Mechanics of writ

ing are reflective of

APA style.

points

pts

(45-50

)

A broad understand

ing of APA format

and style is evident.

Accurate citations

and references are

presented. No APA

errors are evident.

Overall Score

Level 1

points minimum

Level 2

350

points minimum

Level 3

400

points minimum

Level 4

500

points minimum

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956666/View 1/4