Module 8 Assessment of Research, Evaluation and Intervention Development

profilephaynes
Module8AssessmentofResearchEvaluationandInterventionDevelopmentHOMEWORK.docx

Module 8 Assessment of Research, Evaluation and Intervention Development

(Purpose)

This final assignment will provide the opportunity for you to reflect on the analyses you have conducted in the three previous assignments. In considering the work you have done with the exemplar articles in the comparative analysis you will make conclusions on the best practice (INTERVENTION) to address the social problem that you selected in Assignment 1. Furthermore, you'll draw conclusions on the overall development of interventions to address the social problem of issue and the state of evaluation as a tool to advance practice.

Course Objectives

· CO 1: Think critically about the use of hypothesis testing in the behavioral sciences.

· CO 5: Coherently describe conclusions from a hypothesis test in written form.

Requirements and Guidelines

1. Review the Course Outcomes for this assignment, which are listed above.

2. Using the previously selected four articles in analysis assignment in Module 2, write a paper that address key areas listed below.

3. You can use the questions under each criteria to complete the assignment. Review the Grading Criteria below for details on point distribution.

4. Please use APA format for both in-text citation and references.

Assignment 8: Assessment of research and evaluation and intervention development

Using the four evaluative articles that you have identified, and the assessments made in the three previous assignments, reflect on the following:

EXTRA NOTES**** The final paper is the reflection...or formulating your own conclusions on evaluation and practice in your identified practice area (Alcohol Use)

Again, thinking of the sample articles that you have selected as "exemplars" of what is provided for in the field, 

Content wise, you’ll be thinking about the issue of practical vs. statistical significance in thinking about the results of a study. 

You are writing about all 4 Articles Answer All 5 QUESTIONS

1. How well developed is the field of intervention to address the specific social problem that you have identified? How well developed Like was, CBT,12-Step used in the 4 Articles (Focus on the intervention for Alcohol use, You can also get information from internet concerning alcohol intervention)(

2. How well developed is the knowledge base related to the social problem that you have identified? Is the problem well defined (yes in practice The DSM-IV is often used, did Articles meet diagnostic knowledge base)?

3. How well developed is evaluation of intervention for the problem you have selected? ( were consistence measures used, look at Articles..

4. How well is the problem, intervention, and evaluation/research sensitive to diverse populations? How the problem affects diverse population.

5. what are your thoughts on the sophistication of evaluation techniques that are used to judge effectiveness;  and what are your thoughts on the development of practice knowledge to address the problem that has been your focus. 

Grading Criteria

Your assignment will be graded based on following criteria:

Criteria

Points

Description

Discussion on the development of problem definition and measures/outcomes

30

How well developed is the literature in defining the problem and relevant outcomes for intervention?

Discussion on the literature and diversity

30

How well does the literature address diversity in both defining and documenting the experience of the problem?

Discussion on the development of the field of intervention to address the social problem.

30

How well developed are the methods of evaluation to assess intervention for the social problem?

Discussion, including rationale, for the selection of best practice(s) in the field of intervention to address the social problem.

30

How well developed are the methods of evaluation to assess intervention for the social problem?

Discussion on recommendations for practice

20

These questions essentially inquire into the validity and reliability of measures to assess outcome and the methodologies for data collection that are being used.

Clarity of Writing

15

Communicate ideas clearly with proper grammar and spelling.

APA Style

15

Follow APA rules of formatting.

Total

100

A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

Rubric

Assessment of Research, Evaluation and Intervention Development

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Discussion on the development of problem definition and measures/

30 pts

Highest Level of performance

Provides comprehensive analysis and rationale for ratings.

23 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Partially provides analysis and rationale for the ratings.

17 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Provides analysis or rationale for rating that is somewhat complete.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides incomplete narrative; analysis and rationale for rating is not apparent.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Discussion on the literature and diversity

30 pts

Highest Level of performance

Provides comprehensive analysis and rationale for ratings.

23 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Partially provides analysis and rationale for the ratings.

17 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Provides analysis or rationale for rating that is somewhat complete.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides incomplete narrative; analysis and rationale for rating is not apparent.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Discussion on the development of the field of intervention to address the social problem.

30 pts

Highest Level of performance

Provides comprehensive analysis and rationale for ratings.

23 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Partially provides analysis and rationale for the ratings.

17 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Discussion on the development of the field of intervention to address the social problem.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides incomplete narrative; analysis and rationale for rating is not apparent.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Discussion, including rationale, for the selection of best practice(s) in the field of intervention to address the social problem.

30 pts

Highest Level of performance

Provides comprehensive analysis and rationale for ratings.

23 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Partially provides analysis and rationale for the ratings.

17 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Provides analysis or rationale for rating that is somewhat complete.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides incomplete narrative; analysis and rationale for rating is not apparent.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Discussion on recommendations for practice

30 pts

Highest Level of performance

Provides robust recommendations for the practice.

23 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Provides very good recommendations for the practice.

17 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Provides acceptable recommendations for the practice.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides inaccurate or no recommendations for the practice.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Clarity of Writing and APA Style

15 pts

Highest Level of performance

Excellent use of standard English showing original thought.

11 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Some evidence of own expression and competent use of language.

11 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Good evidence of own expression and competent use of language.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Language needs significant development. Numerous spelling and/or grammar errors.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Clarity of Writing

15 pts

Highest Level of performance

APA format correct with no more than 1-2 minor errors.

13 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

3-5 errors in APA format and/or 1-2 citations are missing.

11 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

APA formatting contains multiple errors and/or several citations are missing.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Language needs significant development. Numerous spelling and/or grammar errors.