Advanced Nursing Leadership Reflection_Module 8

Theory,

Philosophy, &

Leadership

Framework for

Implementation

Weight: 20%

0 points

(0-69 pts.)

Discussion on theory for implementation, including predictions, and help to extend existing knowledge are clear and concise to give a detailed picture. Philosophy and ethical implications and framework are not demonstrated or missing.

70 points

(70 - 79 pts.)

Discussion on theory for implementation including predictions and help to extend existing knowledge are clear and concise to give a detailed picture. Philosophy and ethical framework are included but lacks details.

80 points

(80 - 89 pts.)

Discussion on theory for implementation including predictions and help to extend existing knowledge are clear and concise to give a detailed picture. Philosophy and ethical framework is present, appropriate, and complete.

100 points

(90- 100 pts.)

Discussion on the theory for implementation including predictions and help to extend existing knowledge are clear and concise to give a detailed picture. Philosophy and ethical framework, is thoroughly explained and clearly, and expertly demonstrated.

/ 100

Culture & Key

Stakeholders Weight: 20%

0 points

(0-69 pts)

Description of culture needed for change intervention, and stakeholders necessary for implementation are not provided.

70 points

(70 - 79 pts)

Description of culture needed for change intervention and stakeholders necessary for implementation are present but missing details.

80 points

(80 - 89 pts)

Description of culture needed for change intervention and stakeholders necessary for implementation are provided and discussed.

100 points

(90-100 pts)

Description of culture needed for change intervention and stakeholders necessary for implementation are clearly and concisely defined, and wellcrafted.

/ 100

Impact of

Healthcare

Policy,

Information

Technology &

Implications

Weight: 20%

0 points

(0 - 69 pts)

Depiction of the impact of healthcare policy, information technology and the implications on this project are not clear or are missing.

70 points

(70 – 79 pts)

Depiction of the impact of healthcare policy, information technology and the implications on this project are incorporated, but missing details.

80 points

(80 – 89 pts)

Depiction of the impact of healthcare policy, information technology and the implications on this project are incorporated and demonstrated.

100 points

(90 - 100 pts)

Depiction of the impact of healthcare policy, information technology and the implications on this project are embraced and expressed, clearly and thoroughly.

/ 100

Quality of

Written

Communication

Weight: 10%

0 points

(0-34 pts.)

Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

35 points

(35-39 pts.)

Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd.

Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

40 points

(40-44 pts.)

Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word

choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

50 points

(45-50 pts.)

Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

/ 50