Patho Project Questions Help Kawasaki Disease

7/25/21, 1:45 PMModule 5: My Research and Response to Fighting Disease Final Project - BIO216C01 Pathophysiology (Susan Kennedy) SU21 - CCCOnline

Page 1 of 3https://ccco.desire2learn.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=2318751&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=3115660

My Research and Response to Fighting Disease Final Project Submission Rubric Course: BIO216C01 Pathophysiology (Susan Kennedy) SU21

Criteria Highly Proficient (81-100%) Moderately Proficient (61- 80%)

Somewhat Proficient (41- 60%)

Not Proficient (1-40%) No Submission (0 points)

Content Development

Conclusions and Related

Outcomes (Implications

and Consequences)

Evidence: Selecting and

using information to

investigate a point of

view or conclusion

Independence

Curiosity

45 points

Uses appropriate, relevant,

and compelling content to

illustrate mastery of the

subject, conveying the

writer's understanding and

shaping the whole work.

36 points

Uses appropriate, relevant,

and compelling content to

explore ideas within the

context of the discipline and

shape the whole work.

27 points

Uses appropriate and

relevant content to develop

and explore ideas

throughout most of the

work.

18 points

Uses appropriate and

relevant content to develop

simple ideas in some parts of

the work.

0 points

Work is not submitted, or

submitted work contains

none of the required

components, or submitted

work contains plagiarized

content.

45 points

Conclusions and related

outcomes (consequences and

implications) are logical, and

reflect student’s informed

evaluation and ability to

place evidence and

perspectives discussed in

priority order.

36 points

Conclusions are logically tied

to a range of information,

including opposing

viewpoints. Related

outcomes (consequences and

implications) are identified

clearly.

27 points

Conclusion is logically tied to

information because

information is chosen to fit

the desired conclusion. Some

related outcomes

(consequences and

implications) are identified

clearly.

18 points

Conclusion is inconsistently

tied to some of the

information discussed.

Related

outcomes (consequences and

implications) are

oversimplified.

0 points

Work is not submitted, or

submitted work contains

none of the required

components, or submitted

work contains plagiarized

content.

40 points

Information is taken from at

least 5 source(s) with enough

interpretation and evaluation

to develop a comprehensive

analysis or synthesis.

Viewpoints of experts are

questioned thoroughly.

32 points

Information is taken from

source(s) with enough

interpretation and evaluation

to develop a coherent

analysis or synthesis.

Viewpoints of experts are

subject to questioning.

24 points

Information is taken from

source(s) with some

interpretation and

evaluation, but not enough

to develop a coherent

analysis or synthesis.

Viewpoints of experts are

taken as mostly fact, with

little questioning.

16 points

Information is taken from

source(s) without any

interpretation or evaluation.

Viewpoints of experts are

taken as fact, without

question.

0 points

Work is not submitted, or

submitted work contains

none of the required

components, or submitted

work contains plagiarized

content.

30 points

Educational interests and

pursuits exist and flourish

outside classroom

requirements. Knowledge

and/or experiences are

pursued independently.

24 points

Beyond classroom

requirements, pursues

substantial additional

knowledge and/or actively

pursues independent

educational experiences.

18 points

Beyond classroom

requirements, pursues

additional knowledge and/or

shows interest in pursuing

independent educational

experiences.

12 points

Begins to look beyond

classroom requirements,

showing interest in pursuing

knowledge independently.

0 points

Work is not submitted, or

submitted work contains

none of the required

components, or submitted

work contains plagiarized

content.

30 points

Explores a topic in depth,

yielding a rich awareness of

and/or little-known

information about the topics

and indicating intense

interest in the subject.

24 points

Explores a topic in depth,

yielding insight and/or

information and indicating

interest in the subject.

18 points

Explores a topic with some

evidence of depth, providing

occasional insight and/or

information and indicating

mild interest in the subject.

12 points

Explores a topic at a surface

level, providing little insight

and/or information beyond

the very basic facts and

indicating low interest in the

subject.

0 points

Work is not submitted, or

submitted work contains

none of the required

components, or submitted

work contains plagiarized

content.

30 points

Demonstrates skillful use of

high-quality, credible, and

relevant sources to develop

ideas that are appropriate for

the discipline and genre of

the writing. Sources are cited

24 points

Demonstrates consistent use

of credible and relevant

sources to support ideas that

are situated within the

discipline and genre of the

writing. Sources are all or

18 points

Demonstrates an attempt to

use credible and/or relevant

sources to support ideas that

are appropriate for the

discipline and genre of the

writing. Sources are mostly

12 points

Demonstrates an attempt to

use sources to support ideas,

but sources may or may not

be cited and referenced

using APA Style.

0 points

Work is not submitted, or

submitted work contains

none of the required

components, or submitted

work contains plagiarized

content.

7/25/21, 1:45 PMModule 5: My Research and Response to Fighting Disease Final Project - BIO216C01 Pathophysiology (Susan Kennedy) SU21 - CCCOnline

Page 2 of 3https://ccco.desire2learn.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=2318751&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=3115660

Total

Overall Score

Sources and Evidence

Genre and Disciplinary

Conventions: Formal

and informal rules

inherent in the

expectations for writing

in particular forms

and/or academic fields

Control of Syntax and

Mechanics

and referenced using APA

Style.

mostly cited and referenced

using APA Style.

cited and referenced using

APA Style.

20 points

Demonstrates detailed

attention to and successful

execution of a wide range of

conventions in final paper,

including organization,

content, presentation,

formatting, and stylistic

choices.

16 points

Demonstrates the consistent

use of important conventions

in final paper, including

choices pertaining to

organization, content,

presentation, and style.

12 points

Follows appropriate

expectations in his or her

final paper for basic

organization, content, and

presentation.

8 points

Attempts to use in his or her

final paper a consistent

system for basic

organization and

presentation.

0 points

Work is not submitted, or

submitted work contains

none of the required

components, or submitted

work contains plagiarized

content.

20 points

Uses language that skillfully

communicates meaning to

readers with clarity and

fluency, and is virtually error

free.

16 points

Uses straightforward

language that conveys

meaning to readers. The

language in the portfolio has

few errors.

12 points

Uses language that generally

conveys meaning to readers

with clarity, although writing

may include some errors.

8 points

Uses language that

sometimes impedes

understanding of meaning

because of errors in usage.

0 points

Work is not submitted, or

submitted work contains

none of the required

components, or submitted

work contains plagiarized

content.

Highly Proficient (81-100%) 209 points minimum

Moderately Proficient (61-80%) 157 points minimum

Somewhat Proficient (41-60%) 105 points minimum

Not Proficient (1-40%) 1 point minimum

7/25/21, 1:45 PMModule 5: My Research and Response to Fighting Disease Final Project - BIO216C01 Pathophysiology (Susan Kennedy) SU21 - CCCOnline

Page 3 of 3https://ccco.desire2learn.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=2318751&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=3115660