nursing informatics
fimi
Module5_Week10_Assignment6051.pdf
1/30/23, 1:48 PM Module 5: Week 10: Assignment
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/22139/assignments/132964?module_item_id=464434 3/5
Criteria Ratings Pts
25 pts
25 pts
Develop a 2- to 3-page role description for a graduate- level nurse to guide his/her participation on the implementation team. The role description should be based on the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) stages and tasks and should clearly define how this individual will participate in and impact each of the following steps:· Planning and requirements definition· Analysis· Design of the new system· Implementation· Post- implementation support
25 to >22.0 pts Excellent
Using the literature and course resources:...An accurate and fully developed role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: definition of planning and requirements.
22 to >19.0 pts Good
Using the literature and course resources:...A role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: definition of planning and requirements.
19 to >17.0 pts Fair
The response elements are superficially addressed.
17 to >0 pts Poor
The response is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing.
· Analysis· Design of the new system
25 to >22.0 pts Excellent
Using the literature and course resources:...An accurate and fully developed role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and
22 to >19.0 pts Good
Using the literature and course resources:...A role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps:
19 to >17.0 pts Fair
The response elements are superficially addressed.
17 to >0 pts Poor
The response is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing.
1/30/23, 1:48 PM Module 5: Week 10: Assignment
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/22139/assignments/132964?module_item_id=464434 4/5
Criteria Ratings Pts
25 pts
10 pts
impact each of these steps: analysis and design of the new system.
analysis and design of the new system.
· Implementation· Post- implementation support
25 to >22.0 pts Excellent Using the literature and course resources:...An accurate and fully developed role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: implementation and post- implementation support.
22 to >19.0 pts Good Using the literature and course resources:...A role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: implementation and post- implementation support.
19 to >17.0 pts Fair The response elements are superficially addressed.
17 to >0 pts Poor The response is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing
Resources 10 to >8.0 pts Excellent Assignment includes: 3 or more peer- reviewed articles and 2 or more course resources.
8 to >7.0 pts Good Assignment includes: 2 peer-reviewed articles and 2 course resources.
7 to >6.0 pts Fair Assignment includes: 1 peer-reviewed article and 1 course resource.
6 to >0 pts Poor Assignment includes: 1 or no resources.
1/30/23, 1:48 PM Module 5: Week 10: Assignment
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/22139/assignments/132964?module_item_id=464434 5/5
Total Points: 100
Criteria Ratings Pts
5 pts
5 pts
5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
4 to >3.0 pts Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
3 to >2.0 pts Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
2 to >0 pts Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts Good
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 to >2.0 pts Fair
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
2 to >0 pts Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts Good
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
3 to >2.0 pts Fair
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
2 to >0 pts Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
