ACADEMIC SUCCESS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PART 2: STRATEGIES TO PROMOTE ACADEMIC INTEGRITY AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS

NURS_6003_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

35 pts

Part 2, Section 1: Using the Academic and Professional Success Development Template write a 2-3 paragraph analysis that includes the following:· Explanation for the relationship between academic integrity and writing. · Explanation for the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics. - Cite at least 2 resources that support your argument. · Use Grammarly and Turnitin to improve the product. Include sufficient evidence that these tools were utilized in explanation on how these tools contribute to academic integrity.

35 to >31.0 pts Excellent The response clearly and accurately explains the relationship between academic integrity and writing. ... The response clearly and accurately explains the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics. ... The response clearly and accurately describes how Grammarly, Turnitin, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including sufficient evidence that Grammarly and Turnitin were used to improve the responses provided.

31 to >27.0 pts Good The response accurately explains the relationship between academic integrity and writing. ... The response accurately explains the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics. ... The response accurately describes how Grammarly, Turnitin, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including evidence that Grammarly and Turnitin were used to improve the responses provided.

27 to >24.0 pts Fair The response vaguely explains the relationship between academic integrity and writing. ... The response vaguely explains the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics. ... The response vaguely describes how Grammarly, Turnitin, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity. The response includes insufficient evidence that Grammarly and Turnitin were used to improve the responses provided.

24 to >0 pts Poor The response vaguely and inaccurately explains the relationship between academic integrity and writing or is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately explains the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics or is missing. ... The response vaguely and inaccurately describes how Grammarly, Turnitin, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity. The response includes insufficient or no evidence that Grammarly and Turnitin were used to improve the responses provided or the response is missing.

Criteria Ratings Pts

55 pts

5 pts

Part 2, Section 2: Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of WorkIdentify and describe strategies you intend to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of your 1) academic work while a student of the MSN program, and 2) professional work as a nurse throughout your career. Include a review of resources and approaches you propose to use as a student and a professional.

55 to >49.0 pts Excellent The response clearly identifies and accurately describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in professional work as a nurse. ... The response clearly reviews and accurately proposes resources and approaches to use as a student and professional.

49 to >43.0 pts Good The response identifies and describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in professional work as a nurse. ... The response reviews and proposes resources and approaches to use as a student and professional.

43 to >38.0 pts Fair The response vaguely identifies and describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in professional work as a nurse. ... The response inaccurately reviews and/or vaguely proposes resources and approaches to use as a student and professional.

38 to >0 pts Poor The response about integrity and ethics strategies is vague and inaccurate or is missing. ... The response about resources and approaches is vague and inaccurate or is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting— Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well- developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused— neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4 to >3.0 pts Good Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3 to >2.0 pts Fair Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60– 79% of the time.

2 to >0 pts Poor Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.

Total Points: 100

Criteria Ratings Pts

5 pts

Written Expression and Formatting— English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts Good Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts Fair Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.