DNP-IVA 2

Instructions: In the Symphadiol trial, from this week’s lecture, select an appropriate group of participants and write two null hypotheses.   Submission Instructions: • • Contribute a minimum of (1) pages. It should include at least (2) academic

sources, formatted and cited in APA WITHIN THE PAST 5 YEARS • NO MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM OR AI TEXT  

Rubric - Official Assignment Rubric - Official Assignment Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Professionalism Concept Application

20 to >18.0 pts Excellent The student meets 90% to 100% of the required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions. 18 to >16.0 pts Good The student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying proficient facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions. 16 to >14.0 pts Fair The student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Grammar Written Communication

20 to >18.0 pts Excellent Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences. 18 to >16.0 pts Good Minimal (1 - 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors 16 to >14.0 pts Fair Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. 14 to >12.0 pts Poor Severe (8 - 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. 12 to >0 pts Unacceptable Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communication Specific Formatting

20 to >18.0 pts Excellent The assignment meets 90 % - 100% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information is complete in all the required components and exceeds expectations. 18 to >16.0 pts Good The assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all the necessary components and formatting requirements. 16 to >14.0 pts Fair The assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. However, the presented information is missing some key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format. 14 to >12.0 pts Poor The assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in the

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical and Logical Thinking Thought analysis process

20 to >18.0 pts Excellent The assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate and correctly documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and concise analysis along with an impeccable and precise, well-thought process. 18 to >16.0 pts Good The assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and correctly documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental thought process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the assignment expectations. 16 to >14.0 pts Fair The assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Academic Literacy Quality of Sources and APA Citations

20 to >18.0 pts Excellent Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly. 18 to >16.0 pts Good Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references. 16 to >14.0 pts Fair Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is

20 pts

Total Points: 100