Essay
MNG00912 Environmental Management for Hotels and Attractions
Assessment 1: Essay Marking Rubric
|
MARKING CRITERIA |
HIGH DISTINCTION |
DISTINCTION |
CREDIT |
PASS |
FAIL |
|
Introduction: Introduces the topic; provides an overview of the essay
5% |
Highly engaging; well developed and written; provides an excellent lead-in to the essay |
Engaging; well developed and written; provides a very good lead-in to the essay |
A good introduction but still somewhat limited in its scope |
Adequate introduction but is limited in its development and scope |
Introduction fails to adequately begin the essay; fails to provide an adequate overview; confused and unclear |
|
Provides a definition of climate change and a discussion of its global significance
10% |
Excellent definition informed by relevant and contemporary literature; clearly stated and readily understandable; excellent discussion of the ramifications of climate change at a global scale |
Very good construction of the definition, informed by relevant literature; clearly stated and readily understandable; very good level of discussion |
Good construction of the definition, informed by relevant literature; reasonably clearly stated and understandable; good level of discussion |
Adequate construction of the definition, informed by relevant literature; adequate level of discussion |
Either does not provide a clear definition informed by relevant literature or the definition used is ambiguous or unclear; poor discussion of ramifications |
|
Description of the impacts that climate change is having and could have on the selected sector
20% |
Identifies and describes at an excellent and appropriate level of detail the impacts that climate change has and could have on the sector |
Identifies and describes at a very good, appropriate level of detail the impacts that climate change has and could have on the sector |
Identifies and describes at a generally goo level of detail the impacts that climate change has and could have on the sector |
Identifies and describes at an adequate and basic level of detail the impacts that climate change has and could have on the sector |
Does not clearly describe the impacts or if it does, the description is superficial |
|
Analysis and critical discussion of the impacts that climate change is having and could have on the selected sector
20% |
Demonstrates a sophisticated ability to synthesise and analyse information taken from academic and technical publications in order to discuss the current and potential impacts on the sector |
Very good level of analysis and synthesis of information drawn from academic and technical publications in order to discuss the current and potential impacts on the sector |
A good level of synthesis and analysis of information drawn from academic and technical publications in order to develop discussion of the current and potential impacts |
Adequate, basic level of analysis which allows for some discussion of the current and potential impacts on the sector, but tends, overall to remain at a descriptive level |
Inadequate analysis and critical discussion of the current and potential impacts of climate change on the selected sector |
|
Inclusion of appropriate examples that help develop argument
5%
|
Excellent use of relevant and illustrative examples |
Very good use of relevant and illustrative examples |
Good use of relevant and illustrative examples |
Adequate use of relevant and illustrative examples |
No examples included or if they are, they are not relevant or appropriate |
|
Well researched, utilising a range of relevant academic literature that is properly referenced
10% |
Essay clearly informed by an extremely well executed process of research; excellent references both academic and technical, used and referenced correctly; direct quotes to a minimum |
Uses appropriate number of academic articles, book and technical publications; referenced correctly; keeps direct quotes to a minimum |
Good level of research has been used though it falls short of being very good. References are appropriate and few errors in referencing |
Adequate level of research that achieves the minimum standard. Some errors in referencing |
Poorly researched; inadequate use of academic and technical literature; incorrectly referenced |
|
Appropriate standard of written expression
10% |
Written expression is excellent: clear, fluent, elegant |
Written expression is very good: clear and fluent |
Written expression is good but not very good |
Written expression is adequate, though sometimes there might be poorly constructed sentences or paragraphs |
Inadequate standard of written expression; difficult to understand much of the essay |
|
Logical and systematic structure
10% |
Essay has a very clear structure; there is a logical flow of ideas and the development of an argument; excellent transitions from one paragraph to the next |
Essay has a clear structure; there is a logical flow of ideas and the development of an argument; very transitions from one paragraph to the next |
Essay has a reasonably clear structure; there is a logical flow of ideas and the development of an argument; generally good transitions from one paragraph to the next |
Adequate structure but some flaws in the flow of ideas; argument not as strong as it could be; poor transitions |
Poorly and inadequately structured and organised |
|
Reference List
10% |
Reference list is correctly constructed; completely free of errors |
A very good reference list, containing no significant errors |
Reference list is more than adequate and mostly free of errors |
Reference List is adequate and is largely free of errors but there are some errors |
Reference list is mostly incorrectly constructed and contains many errors |