unit 3 assigment

Unit 3 Assignment Criteria

Level III

Level II

Level I

Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III Max Points

Points: 10

Level II Max Points

Points: 8

Level I Max Points

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Atrial Fibrillation review

Provides an analysis using all four of the following tools:

· SAF Scale

· CHA2DS2-VASc

· HAS-BLED

· Combo Calculator

Provides an analysis using only three of the following tools:

· SAF Scale

· CHA2DS2-VASc

· HAS-BLED

· Combo Calculator

Provides an analysis using only two of the following tools:

· SAF Scale

· CHA2DS2-VASc

· HAS-BLED

· Combo Calculator

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 2

Level III Max Points

Points: 10

Level II Max Points

Points: 8

Level I Max Points

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Antithrombotic therapy and AFib medications

· Provides thorough analysis of antithrombotic and Afib medications.

· No details are missing.

· Provides moderate analysis of antithrombotic and Afib medications.

· Minor details are missing.

· Provides incorrect or minimal analysis of antithrombotic and Afib medications.

· Major details are missing.

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 3

Level III Max Points

Points: 10

Level II Max Points

Points: 8

Level I Max Points

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Patient education for antithrombotic and AFib medications.

· Provides thorough and appropriate patient education for antithrombotic and Afib medications.

· No details are missing.

· Provides moderate patient education for antithrombotic and Afib medications.

· Minor details are missing.

· Provides incorrect or minimal patient education for antithrombotic and Afib medications.

· Major details are missing.

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 4

Level III Max Points

Points: 10

Level II Max Points

Points: 8

Level I Max Points

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Patient documentation meets HIPAA guidelines

Does not disclose Protected Health Information (PHI) identifiers.

· N/A

· N/A

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 5

Level III Max Points

Points: 3

Level II Max Points

Points: 2

Level I Max Points

Points: 1

Not Present

0 Points

College-level academic writing

· Writing style facilitates

communication.

· No grammar, word

usage or punctuation

errors.

· Overall style is

consistent with

professional work.

· Writing style and

communication is unclear.

Several confusing statements.

· Two grammar, word

usage or punctuation

errors.

· Writing style and

communication is unclear.

· Paragraphs are out of order and unclear.

Many confusing statements.

· Three grammar, word

usage or punctuation

errors.

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 6

Level III Max Points

Points: 2

Level II Max Points

Points: 1

Level I Max Points

Points: 0.5

Not Present

0 Points

Citations and Formatting

· Provides five references

that are relevant to

content and published

within the last five years

· References and in text citations follow APA format guidelines.

· Provides four references

that are relevant to

content and published

within the last five years

· References and in text citations generally follow APA format guidelines.

· Provides three references that are relevant to content and published within the last five years

· References and in text citations ensure that authorship is somewhat clear.

· Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

45

35

25.5

0

Minimum Total Points

36 points minimum

26 points minimum

1 point minimum

0

Unit 4 Assignment Criteria

Level III

Level II

Level I

Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III Max Points

Points: 10

Level II Max Points

Points: 8

Level I Max Points

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Patient age >64 years who is at risk for falls.

· Patient description is detailed including age, gender, ethnicity, medical diagnoses, previous falls, medication allergies,

· Includes list of prescriptions/OTC medications/herbal supplements including dosage, route, and frequency

· Patient description includes some demographics but is missing details such as ethnicity, pertinent medical diagnoses, time of day of falls, frequency and number of falls within the last year, assistive devices used.

· Other details such as supplements or frequency, dose, route of administration of medications missing.

· Allergies missing.

· Patient description is lacking major details such as any of the following age, gender, ethnicity, medications including Rx and OTC supplements, fall history, medical diagnoses, and assistive devices.

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 2

Level III Max Points

Points: 10

Level II Max Points

Points: 8

Level I Max Points

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Age-related changes

· Describes five or more age-related changes, and how they affect fall risk.

· Describes three-four age-related changes and how they affect fall risk.

· Describes one-two age-related changes and how they affect fall risk.

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 3

Level III Max Points

Points: 10

Level II Max Points

Points: 8

Level I Max Points

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Identified functional limitations and strategies for reduction of risk for falls

· Provides thorough analysis of five or more disease, age, or other functional related limitations and their related strategies for reduction of risk for falls including durable medical equipment, assistive devices, home modifications and patient education.

· Not all identified functional limitations or fall risks are addressed in depth or some are incorrect.

· Patient education is vague.

· Assistive devices and home modifications are addressed in brief manner.

· Analysis of functional limitations is missing or incorrect.

· Patient education is missing.

· Provides incorrect or minimal strategies for fall risk prevention or patient education and strategies for fall risk prevention

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 4

Level III Max Points

Points: 10

Level II Max Points

Points: 8

Level I Max Points

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Impact of falls on healthcare expenditures and finances on the individual and nation

· Provides thorough analysis of the impact on personal finances and national healthcare expenditures

· Includes mortality rates after a fall.

· Provides brief analysis of the impact on personal finances and national healthcare expenditures

· Includes mortality rates after a fall.

· Minor details missing.

· Provides vague analysis of the impact on personal finances and national healthcare expenditures

· Excludes mortality rates after a fall.

· Major details are missing.

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 5

Level III Max Points

Points: 3

Level II Max Points

Points: 2

Level I Max Points

Points: 1

Not Present

0 Points

College-level academic writing

· Writing style facilitates

communication.

· No grammar, word

usage or punctuation

errors.

· Overall style is

consistent with

professional work.

· Writing style and

communication is unclear.

· Several confusing statements.

· Two grammar, word

usage or punctuation

errors.

· Writing style and

communication is unclear.

· Paragraphs are out of order and unclear.

· Many confusing statements.

· Three grammar, word usage or punctuation errors.

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 6

Level III Max Points

Points: 2

Level II Max Points

Points: 1

Level I Max Points

Points: 0.5

Not Present

0 Points

Citations and Formatting

· Provides five references

that are relevant to

content and published

within the last five years

· References and in text citations follow APA format guidelines.

· Provides four references

that are relevant to

content and published

within the last five years

· References and in text citations generally follow APA format guidelines.

· Provides three references that are relevant to content and published within the last five years

· References and in text citations ensure that authorship is somewhat clear.

· Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

45

35

25.5

0

Minimum Total Points

36 points minimum

26 points minimum

1 point minimum

0

Criteria 1

Level III Max Points

Points: 100

Level II Max Points

Points: 0

Level I Max Points

Points: 0

Not Present

0 Points

Clinical Hours

● All clinical hours confirmed by the preceptor, all patient encounters completed and submitted to Core Elms, Midterm Evaluation completed with preceptor and student.

● Does not meet the criteria.

● Does not meet the criteria.

● Does not meet the criteria.

Maximum Total Points

100

0

0

0

Minimum Total Points

100 points minimum

0

0

0

Criteria 1

Level III Max Points

Points: 300

Level II Max Points

Points: 240

Level I Max Points

Points: 210

Not Present

0 Points

Final Evaluation

● Final Preceptor evaluation = 4.1-5.0

● Final Preceptor Evaluation contains a minimum comment of “acceptable, average, or effective” in all areas and no negative comments in the evaluation.

● Minimum required clinical hours completed

● All hours logged & confirmed in CORE/ELMS

● All Field encounters documented in CORE/ELMS

● Student evaluation completed & in CORE/ELMS

● Assisted in facilitating required Preceptor calls

● Final Preceptor evaluation = 3.5-4.0

● Final Preceptor Evaluation contains a minimum comment of “acceptable, average, or effective” in all areas and no negative comments in the evaluation.

● Minimum required clinical hours completed

● All hours logged & confirmed in CORE/ELMS

● All Field encounters documented in CORE/ELMS

● Student evaluation completed & in CORE/ELMS

● Assisted in facilitating required Preceptor calls

● Final Preceptor evaluation = 3.0-3.4

● Final Preceptor Evaluation contains a minimum comment of “acceptable, average, or effective” in all areas and no negative comments in the evaluation.

● Minimum required clinical hours completed

● All hours logged & confirmed in CORE/ELMS

● All Field encounters documented in CORE/ELMS

● Student evaluation completed & in CORE/ELMS

● Assisted in facilitating required Preceptor calls

● Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

300

240

210

0

Minimum Total Points

241 points minimum

211 points minimum

1 point minimum

0