Nursing journal assignment

Criteria 1

Level III Max Points

Points: 5

Level II Max Points

Points: 4

Level I Max Points

Points: 3

0 Points

Content Quality- Subjective Data

Subjective data displays complete understanding of all critical concepts of virtual reality patient case including:

· Name, age, gender

· Chief complaint

· History of present illness (HPI) that follows OLD CARTS pneumonic

· Medications

· Allergies

· Past medical history

· Past surgical history

· Pertinent family history

· Social history

· Review of Systems

· Subjective data displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 1-2 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Subjective data displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 3-4 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 2

Level III Max Points

Points: 5

Level II Max Points

Points: 4

Level I Max Points

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Content Quality- Objective Data

Objective data displays complete understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case including:

· Vital signs

· Body systems that are pertinent to specific case

· Objective data displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 1-2 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Objective data displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 3-4 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 3

Level III Max Points

Points: 5

Level II Max Points

Points: 4

Level I Max Points

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Content Quality- Assessment

Assessment displays complete understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case including:

· Primary diagnosis

· Pathophysiology of primary diagnosis

· Three differential diagnoses

· Rationales for differential diagnoses

· Assessment displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be onecritical concept with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Assessment displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be two critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 4

Level III Max Points

Points: 5

Level II Max Points

Points: 4

Level I Max Points

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Content Quality- Plan of Care

Plan displays complete understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case including:

· Medications

· Non-pharmacological recommendations

· Diagnostic tests

· Patient education

· Cultural considerations

· Health promotion

· Referrals

· Follow-Up

· Plan displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be one critical concept with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Plan displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 3-4 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 5

Level III Max Points

Points: 3

Level II Max Points

Points: 2.4

Level I Max Points

Points: 1.8

Not Present

0 Points

Collegiate-level academic writing

· Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability.

· Supports all opinions and ideas with relevant and credible reference sources of information.

· Provides three or more peer-reviewed or evidence-based practice scholarly references sources.

· All reference sources are within the past five years.

· Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability.

· Supports many opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information.

· Provides two peer-reviewed or evidence-based practice scholarly references sources.

· All reference sources are within the past five years.

· Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors that makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability.

· Not all references utilized are relevant and/or credible sources of information.

· Provides one peer-reviewed or evidence-based practice scholarly references source.

· Reference sources are within the past five years.

· Does not the meet criteria

Criteria 6

Level III Max Points

Points: 2.0

Level II Max Points

Points: 1.6

Level I Max Points

Points: 1.2

0 Points

Citations and Formatting

● The overall order of information is clear and contributes to the meaning of the assignment.

● There may be 1-2 sentences, or one paragraph that is out of order, or other minor organization issues.

● Strong attempt at APA formatting and correctly citing all reference sources. One or two formatting, in-text, or reference citation errors may occur.

● Quotation marks and citations make authorship clear.

● The overall order of information is confusing in places due to 3-4 sentences, or two paragraphs that may be out of order, or other organization issues that interfere with the meaning or intent of the paper.

● Overall attempt at APA formatting and correctly citing all reference sources. 3-4 formatting, in-text, or reference citation errors may occur.

● Quotation marks and citations generally, make authorship clear.

● The overall order of information is confusing in places due to 5-6 sentences or three paragraphs that may be out of place, or other organization issues that interfere with the meaning or intent of the paper.

● Attempts to use APA formatting and citing. 5-6 formatting, in-text, or reference citation errors may occur.

● Quotation marks and citations may be missing or incorrect.

● Authorship may be unclear in areas.

· Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

25

20

15

0

Minimum Total Points

21

16

1

Criteria 1

Level III Max Points

Points: 5

Level II Max Points

Points: 4

Level I Max Points

Points: 3

0 Points

Content Quality- Subjective Data

Presentation of subjective data displays complete understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case including:

· Name, age, gender

· Chief complaint

· History of present illness (HPI) that follows OLD CARTS pneumonic

· Medications

· Allergies

· Past medical history

· Past surgical history

· Pertinent family history

· Social history

· Review of Systems

· Presentation of subjective data displays understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 1-2 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Presentation of subjective data displays understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 3-4 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 2

Level III Max Points

Points: 5

Level II Max Points

Points: 4

Level I Max Points

Points: 3

0 Points

Content Quality- Objective Data

Presentation of objective data displays complete understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case including:

· Vital signs

· Body systems that are pertinent to specific case

· Presentation of objective data displays understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 1-2 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Presentation of objective data displays understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 3-4 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 3

Level III Max Points

Points: 5

Level II Max Points

Points: 4

Level I Max Points

Points: 3

0 Points

Content Quality- Assessment

Presentation of assessment displays complete understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case including:

· Primary diagnosis

· Pathophysiology of primary diagnosis

· Three differential diagnoses

· Rationales for differential diagnoses

· Presentation of assessment displays understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be one critical concept with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Presentation of assessment displays understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be two critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 4

Level III Max Points

Points: 5

Level II Max Points

Points: 4

Level I Max Points

Points: 3

0 Points

Content Quality- Plan of Care

Presentation of plan displays complete understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case including:

· Medications

· Non-pharmacological management

· Diagnostic tests

· Patient education

· Cultural considerations

· Health promotion

· Referrals

· Follow-Up

· Presentation of plan displays understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be one critical concept with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Presentation of plan displays understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 3-4 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details.s

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 5

Level III Max Points

Points: 5

Level II Max Points

Points: 4

Level I Max Points

Points: 3

0 Points

Quality of Oral Presentation

· Presentation demonstrated thorough organization and delivery.

· All ideas were stated in a clear and logical manner.

· Presentation was on topic and relevant.

· Presentation time no longer than 5 minutes

· Presentation was organized and well spoken.

· All ideas were stated in a clear and logical manner.

· Presentation was on topic and relevant.

· Presentation >5 minutes

· Presentation needed more details or content inconclusive.

· Presentation >5 minutes

· Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

25

20

18

0

Minimum Total Points

21

19

1

Criteria 1

Level III Max Points

Points: 100

Level II Max Points

Points: 0

Level I Max Points

Points: 0

Not Present

0 Points

Clinical Hours

· All clinical hours confirmed by the preceptor, all patient encounters completed and submitted to Core Elms, Midterm Evaluation completed with preceptor and student.

· Does not meet the criteria.

· Does not meet the criteria.

· Does not meet the criteria.

Maximum Total Points

100

0

0

0

Minimum Total Points

100 points minimum

0

0

0

Unit 10 Final Assignment Criteria

Level III

Level II

Level I

Not Present

Level III Max Points

Points: 300

Level II Max Points

Points: 240

Level II Max Points

Points: 210

0 points

Final Evaluation

· Final Preceptor evaluation = 4.1-5.0

· Final Preceptor Evaluation contains a minimum comment of “acceptable, average, or effective” in all areas and no negative comments in the evaluation.

· Minimum required clinical hours completed

· All hours logged & confirmed in CORE/ELMS

· All Field encounters documented in CORE/ELMS

· Student evaluation completed & in CORE/ELMS

· Assisted in facilitating required Preceptor calls

· Final Preceptor evaluation = 3.5-4.0

· Final Preceptor Evaluation contains a minimum comment of “acceptable, average, or effective” in all areas and no negative comments in the evaluation.

· Minimum required clinical hours completed

· All hours logged & confirmed in CORE/ELMS

· All Field encounters documented in CORE/ELMS

· Student evaluation completed & in CORE/ELMS

· Assisted in facilitating required Preceptor calls

· Final Preceptor evaluation = 3.0-3.4

· Final Preceptor Evaluation contains a minimum comment of “acceptable, average, or effective” in all areas and no negative comments in the evaluation.

· Minimum required clinical hours completed

· All hours logged & confirmed in CORE/ELMS

· All Field encounters documented in CORE/ELMS

· Student evaluation completed & in CORE/ELMS

· Assisted in facilitating required Preceptor calls

· Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

300

240

210

0

Minimum Total Points

241 points minimum

211 points minimum

1 point minimum

0