unit 4 assignment

Assignment Rubric

Unit 4 Assignment grading rubric. Instructors: Enter total available points in cell H2, and values between 0 and 4 in the yellow cells in the Score column.
						Total available points =	70
Content Rubric	Introductory - Not submitted or largely incomplete. Work may indicate very little if any comprehension of content.	Emergent - Work shows some comprehension but errors indicating miscomprehension may be present.	Practiced - Work indicates overall progress toward comprehension. Minor errors may present.	Proficient/Mastered - Work is complete and indicates full comprehension of content.	Score	Weight	Final Score
	0 - 1.9	2 - 2.9	3 - 3.9	4
Interviewing Strategy	Components of the interview were vague	Components of the interview were somewhat discussed	Essential components of the interview were mostly discussed	All essential components of the interview are discussed clearly	4	20%	0.80
Subjective History	The social, family, and medical history is vague.	Some of the social, family, and medical history is clear.	Most of the social, family, and medical history is clear.	Social, family, and medical history are clear and thorough.	4	20%	0.80
Health Promotion/ Health Maintenance	Health promotion/screening recommendations are not discussed	Health promotion/screening recommendations are discussed that is mostly appropriate. The discussion is limited.	Health promotion/screening recommendations are discussed that is mostly appropriate. The discussion needs minor additional information	Health promotion/screening recommendations are appropriate and thoroughly addressed.	4	20%	0.80
Screening Tools	The screening tool is not identified. There was no discussion about vaildity, reliability, interpretation and scoring.	A screening tool was identified. Validity and reliability are addressed but lacking in detail or conclusion. Interpretation and scoring are discussed but limited, additonal information is needed.	A screening tool was identified that is appropriate for age. Validity and reliability are discussed. Interpretation and scoring are explained, additional details are needed.	A screening tool was identified that is appropriate for age. Validity and reliability are thoroughly discussed. Interpretation and scoring are explained clearly and thoroughly.	4	20%	0.80
Organization	No History, Physical, and Screening Tools were submitted.	History, Physical, and Screening Tools were somewhat organized and overall writing left room for improvement. Some ideas were stated clearly and logically.	History, Physical, and Screening Tools were well-organized, but overall writing left room for improvement. Most ideas were stated clearly and logically.	History, Physical, and Screening Tools were thoroughly organized and well-written. All ideas were stated clearly and logically.	4	15%	0.60
Writing	Project was off topic and not relevant.	Some portions of project were on topic and relevant.	Project was mostly on topic and relevant.	Project was thoroughly on topic and relevant.	4	5%	0.20
(Do Not Change criteria below)						Content Score	70
Writing Deduction Rubric (everyone starts with 4's = no deductions)	Introductory	Emergent	Practiced	Proficient/Mastered	Score	Weight	Final Score
	0-1	2	3	4
Grammar & Punctuation	The overall meaning of the paper is difficult to understand. Sentence structure, subject verb agreement errors, missing prepositions, and missing punctuation make finding meaning difficult.	Several confusing sentences, or 1 to 2 confusing paragraphs make understanding parts of the paper difficult, but the overall paper meaning is clear. Many subject verb agreement errors, run-on sentences, etc. cause confusion.	A few confusing sentences make it difficult to understand a small portion of the paper. However, the overall meaning of a paragraph and the paper are intact. There may be a few subject verb agreement errors or some missing punctuation.	There are one or two confusing sentences, but the overall sentence and paragraph meanings are clear. There are a few minor punctuation errors such as comma splices or run-on sentences.	4	35%	1.40
Spelling	The many misspelled words and incorrect words choices significantly interfere with the readability.	Many typos, misspelled words, or the use of incorrect words making understanding difficult in a few places.	Some misspelled words or the misuse of words such as confusing then/than. However, intent is still clear.	A few misspelled words normally caught by spellcheckers are present but do not significantly interfere with the overall readability of the paper.	4	35%	1.40
Order of Ideas & Length Requirement	Paper has some good information or research, but it does not follow assignment directions and is lacking in overall organization and content.	The order of information is confusing in several places and this organization interferes with the meaning or intent of the paper. However, the paper has a generally discernible purpose and follows assignment directions overall.	The order of information is confusing in a few places and the lack of organization interferes with the meaning or intent of the paper in a minor way.	The overall order of the information is clear and contributes to the meaning of assignment. There is one paragraph or a sentence or two that are out of place or other minor organizational issues. A few sentences may be long and hard to understand. Meets length requirements.	4	20%	0.80
APA	There is some attempt at APA formatting and citing. There are one or more missing parts such as the cover page or references list. Citation information may be missing. Citation mistakes make authorship unclear.	This is an attempt use APA formatting and citing. There are both in-text citations and reference listings. Citation information may be missing or incorrect (i.e. Websites listed as in-text or reference citations). There is an attempt to cite all outside sources in at least one place. Authorship is generally clear.	There is an overall attempt at APA formatting and citation style. All sources appear to have some form of citation both in the text and on a reference list. There are some formatting and citation errors. Citations generally make authorship clear.	There is a strong attempt to cite all sources using APA style. Minor paper formatting errors such as a misplaced running head or margins may occur. Minor in-text citation errors such as a missing page number or a misplaced date may occur. Quotation marks and citations make authorship clear.	4	10%	0.40
						Writing Deduction	0
						Final Score	70
						Percentage	100%
Feedback: